低血压和恩格列净对急性心力衰竭的影响:EMPULSE分析

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
João Pedro Ferreira, Francisco Vasques-Nóvoa, Christiane E. Angermann, Jan Biegus, Sean P. Collins, Mikhail Kosiborod, Michael E. Nassif, Mitchell A. Psotka, Jasper Tromp, Robert J. Mentz, Piotr Ponikowski, John R. Teerlink, Adriaan A. Voors
{"title":"低血压和恩格列净对急性心力衰竭的影响:EMPULSE分析","authors":"João Pedro Ferreira,&nbsp;Francisco Vasques-Nóvoa,&nbsp;Christiane E. Angermann,&nbsp;Jan Biegus,&nbsp;Sean P. Collins,&nbsp;Mikhail Kosiborod,&nbsp;Michael E. Nassif,&nbsp;Mitchell A. Psotka,&nbsp;Jasper Tromp,&nbsp;Robert J. Mentz,&nbsp;Piotr Ponikowski,&nbsp;John R. Teerlink,&nbsp;Adriaan A. Voors","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Empagliflozin improves outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Patients with AHF and low blood pressure (BP) have poor prognosis. Whether empagliflozin is effective and safe in patients with AHF and low BP is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (vs. placebo) in patients with low BP – either systolic BP (SBP) &lt;110 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) &lt;70 mmHg – at randomization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>EMPULSE included 530 patients with AHF followed for 90 days. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, HF events, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score changes at 90 days tested using the win ratio (WR). Patients were required to have SBP ≥100 mmHg for randomization. A total of 131 (25%) patients had SBP &lt;110 mmHg and 190 (36%) DBP &lt;70 mmHg. In placebo, low BP was associated with more clinical and adverse events. Compared to placebo, BP changes with empagliflozin were of small magnitude (−2 to 2 mmHg), not reaching statistical significance. Patients presenting with low BP increased their BP, on average, throughout the 90-day follow-up, regardless of treatment group. Empagliflozin (vs. placebo) improved clinical outcomes regardless of BP at randomization, potentially with a larger magnitude of effect in patients presenting with low DBP at randomization: primary outcome WR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.0025; WR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.94–1.60 in DBP ≥70 mmHg and WR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.46–3.04 in DBP &lt; 70 mmHg (interaction <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients admitted for AHF with low BP had a higher risk of clinical events. Empagliflozin did not lower BP more than placebo and was effective and safe irrespective of BP. Empagliflozin should be considered for the treatment of AHF patients even when presenting with low BP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"27 4","pages":"671-680"},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low blood pressure and the effect of empagliflozin in acute heart failure: An EMPULSE analysis\",\"authors\":\"João Pedro Ferreira,&nbsp;Francisco Vasques-Nóvoa,&nbsp;Christiane E. Angermann,&nbsp;Jan Biegus,&nbsp;Sean P. Collins,&nbsp;Mikhail Kosiborod,&nbsp;Michael E. Nassif,&nbsp;Mitchell A. Psotka,&nbsp;Jasper Tromp,&nbsp;Robert J. Mentz,&nbsp;Piotr Ponikowski,&nbsp;John R. Teerlink,&nbsp;Adriaan A. Voors\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.3626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Empagliflozin improves outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Patients with AHF and low blood pressure (BP) have poor prognosis. Whether empagliflozin is effective and safe in patients with AHF and low BP is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (vs. placebo) in patients with low BP – either systolic BP (SBP) &lt;110 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) &lt;70 mmHg – at randomization.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\\n \\n <p>EMPULSE included 530 patients with AHF followed for 90 days. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, HF events, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score changes at 90 days tested using the win ratio (WR). Patients were required to have SBP ≥100 mmHg for randomization. A total of 131 (25%) patients had SBP &lt;110 mmHg and 190 (36%) DBP &lt;70 mmHg. In placebo, low BP was associated with more clinical and adverse events. Compared to placebo, BP changes with empagliflozin were of small magnitude (−2 to 2 mmHg), not reaching statistical significance. Patients presenting with low BP increased their BP, on average, throughout the 90-day follow-up, regardless of treatment group. Empagliflozin (vs. placebo) improved clinical outcomes regardless of BP at randomization, potentially with a larger magnitude of effect in patients presenting with low DBP at randomization: primary outcome WR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.0025; WR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.94–1.60 in DBP ≥70 mmHg and WR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.46–3.04 in DBP &lt; 70 mmHg (interaction <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients admitted for AHF with low BP had a higher risk of clinical events. Empagliflozin did not lower BP more than placebo and was effective and safe irrespective of BP. Empagliflozin should be considered for the treatment of AHF patients even when presenting with low BP.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"671-680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3626\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恩帕列净改善急性心力衰竭(AHF)的预后。AHF合并低血压患者预后较差。恩格列净对AHF和低血压患者是否有效和安全目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估依格列净(相对于安慰剂)在随机分组的低血压患者中的疗效和安全性——收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)分别为110 mmHg和70 mmHg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low blood pressure and the effect of empagliflozin in acute heart failure: An EMPULSE analysis

Aims

Empagliflozin improves outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Patients with AHF and low blood pressure (BP) have poor prognosis. Whether empagliflozin is effective and safe in patients with AHF and low BP is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (vs. placebo) in patients with low BP – either systolic BP (SBP) <110 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) <70 mmHg – at randomization.

Methods and results

EMPULSE included 530 patients with AHF followed for 90 days. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, HF events, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score changes at 90 days tested using the win ratio (WR). Patients were required to have SBP ≥100 mmHg for randomization. A total of 131 (25%) patients had SBP <110 mmHg and 190 (36%) DBP <70 mmHg. In placebo, low BP was associated with more clinical and adverse events. Compared to placebo, BP changes with empagliflozin were of small magnitude (−2 to 2 mmHg), not reaching statistical significance. Patients presenting with low BP increased their BP, on average, throughout the 90-day follow-up, regardless of treatment group. Empagliflozin (vs. placebo) improved clinical outcomes regardless of BP at randomization, potentially with a larger magnitude of effect in patients presenting with low DBP at randomization: primary outcome WR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.90, p = 0.0025; WR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.94–1.60 in DBP ≥70 mmHg and WR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.46–3.04 in DBP < 70 mmHg (interaction p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Patients admitted for AHF with low BP had a higher risk of clinical events. Empagliflozin did not lower BP more than placebo and was effective and safe irrespective of BP. Empagliflozin should be considered for the treatment of AHF patients even when presenting with low BP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信