João Pedro Ferreira, Francisco Vasques-Nóvoa, Christiane E. Angermann, Jan Biegus, Sean P. Collins, Mikhail Kosiborod, Michael E. Nassif, Mitchell A. Psotka, Jasper Tromp, Robert J. Mentz, Piotr Ponikowski, John R. Teerlink, Adriaan A. Voors
{"title":"低血压和恩格列净对急性心力衰竭的影响:EMPULSE分析","authors":"João Pedro Ferreira, Francisco Vasques-Nóvoa, Christiane E. Angermann, Jan Biegus, Sean P. Collins, Mikhail Kosiborod, Michael E. Nassif, Mitchell A. Psotka, Jasper Tromp, Robert J. Mentz, Piotr Ponikowski, John R. Teerlink, Adriaan A. Voors","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Empagliflozin improves outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Patients with AHF and low blood pressure (BP) have poor prognosis. Whether empagliflozin is effective and safe in patients with AHF and low BP is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (vs. placebo) in patients with low BP – either systolic BP (SBP) <110 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) <70 mmHg – at randomization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>EMPULSE included 530 patients with AHF followed for 90 days. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, HF events, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score changes at 90 days tested using the win ratio (WR). Patients were required to have SBP ≥100 mmHg for randomization. A total of 131 (25%) patients had SBP <110 mmHg and 190 (36%) DBP <70 mmHg. In placebo, low BP was associated with more clinical and adverse events. Compared to placebo, BP changes with empagliflozin were of small magnitude (−2 to 2 mmHg), not reaching statistical significance. Patients presenting with low BP increased their BP, on average, throughout the 90-day follow-up, regardless of treatment group. Empagliflozin (vs. placebo) improved clinical outcomes regardless of BP at randomization, potentially with a larger magnitude of effect in patients presenting with low DBP at randomization: primary outcome WR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.0025; WR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.94–1.60 in DBP ≥70 mmHg and WR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.46–3.04 in DBP < 70 mmHg (interaction <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients admitted for AHF with low BP had a higher risk of clinical events. Empagliflozin did not lower BP more than placebo and was effective and safe irrespective of BP. Empagliflozin should be considered for the treatment of AHF patients even when presenting with low BP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"27 4","pages":"671-680"},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low blood pressure and the effect of empagliflozin in acute heart failure: An EMPULSE analysis\",\"authors\":\"João Pedro Ferreira, Francisco Vasques-Nóvoa, Christiane E. Angermann, Jan Biegus, Sean P. Collins, Mikhail Kosiborod, Michael E. Nassif, Mitchell A. Psotka, Jasper Tromp, Robert J. Mentz, Piotr Ponikowski, John R. Teerlink, Adriaan A. Voors\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.3626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Empagliflozin improves outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Patients with AHF and low blood pressure (BP) have poor prognosis. Whether empagliflozin is effective and safe in patients with AHF and low BP is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (vs. placebo) in patients with low BP – either systolic BP (SBP) <110 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) <70 mmHg – at randomization.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\\n \\n <p>EMPULSE included 530 patients with AHF followed for 90 days. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, HF events, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score changes at 90 days tested using the win ratio (WR). Patients were required to have SBP ≥100 mmHg for randomization. A total of 131 (25%) patients had SBP <110 mmHg and 190 (36%) DBP <70 mmHg. In placebo, low BP was associated with more clinical and adverse events. Compared to placebo, BP changes with empagliflozin were of small magnitude (−2 to 2 mmHg), not reaching statistical significance. Patients presenting with low BP increased their BP, on average, throughout the 90-day follow-up, regardless of treatment group. Empagliflozin (vs. placebo) improved clinical outcomes regardless of BP at randomization, potentially with a larger magnitude of effect in patients presenting with low DBP at randomization: primary outcome WR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.0025; WR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.94–1.60 in DBP ≥70 mmHg and WR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.46–3.04 in DBP < 70 mmHg (interaction <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients admitted for AHF with low BP had a higher risk of clinical events. Empagliflozin did not lower BP more than placebo and was effective and safe irrespective of BP. Empagliflozin should be considered for the treatment of AHF patients even when presenting with low BP.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"671-680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3626\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low blood pressure and the effect of empagliflozin in acute heart failure: An EMPULSE analysis
Aims
Empagliflozin improves outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Patients with AHF and low blood pressure (BP) have poor prognosis. Whether empagliflozin is effective and safe in patients with AHF and low BP is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (vs. placebo) in patients with low BP – either systolic BP (SBP) <110 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) <70 mmHg – at randomization.
Methods and results
EMPULSE included 530 patients with AHF followed for 90 days. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, HF events, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score changes at 90 days tested using the win ratio (WR). Patients were required to have SBP ≥100 mmHg for randomization. A total of 131 (25%) patients had SBP <110 mmHg and 190 (36%) DBP <70 mmHg. In placebo, low BP was associated with more clinical and adverse events. Compared to placebo, BP changes with empagliflozin were of small magnitude (−2 to 2 mmHg), not reaching statistical significance. Patients presenting with low BP increased their BP, on average, throughout the 90-day follow-up, regardless of treatment group. Empagliflozin (vs. placebo) improved clinical outcomes regardless of BP at randomization, potentially with a larger magnitude of effect in patients presenting with low DBP at randomization: primary outcome WR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.90, p = 0.0025; WR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.94–1.60 in DBP ≥70 mmHg and WR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.46–3.04 in DBP < 70 mmHg (interaction p = 0.02).
Conclusions
Patients admitted for AHF with low BP had a higher risk of clinical events. Empagliflozin did not lower BP more than placebo and was effective and safe irrespective of BP. Empagliflozin should be considered for the treatment of AHF patients even when presenting with low BP.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.