CBCT与MDCT测量镫骨与圆窗线性距离及镫骨窝关节厚度的精度对人工耳蜗植入治疗计划的影响。

Sanaz Sharifishoshtari, Nader Saki, Zohreh Roozbahani, Mohammad Ghasem Hanafi, Maryam Farasat, Zahra Saadi
{"title":"CBCT与MDCT测量镫骨与圆窗线性距离及镫骨窝关节厚度的精度对人工耳蜗植入治疗计划的影响。","authors":"Sanaz Sharifishoshtari, Nader Saki, Zohreh Roozbahani, Mohammad Ghasem Hanafi, Maryam Farasat, Zahra Saadi","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the measurement accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the linear distance between the stapes and round window, and the incudostapedial joint thickness for cochlear implantation treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this in vitro study, 12 temporal bones along with their covering soft tissue underwent high-resolution (HR) and low-resolution (LR) CBCT and MDCT. The linear distance between the stapes and round window as well as the incudostapedial joint thickness were measured on images by an oral radiologist and a general radiologist. Data were analyzed by paired t-test, Wilcoxon test and Pearson's correlation test (alpha=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations and excellent agreement were noted between HR-CBCT and MDCT, HR-CBCT and LR-CBCT, and LR-CBCT and MDCT in both measurements (P<0.05). The mean distance between the stapes and round window on HR-CBCT was significantly higher than that on MDCT and LR-CBCT, and there were significant differences in the measurement accuracy of HR-CBCT with MDCT (P=0.014) and LR-CBCT (P=0.027). The difference between LR-CBCT and MDCT was not significant (P=0.102). The mean joint thickness on HR-CBCT was significantly higher than that on MDCT and the measurement accuracy of CBCT and MDCT was significantly different in this respect (P=0.014). The differences between LR-CBCT and MDCT, and HR-CBCT and LR-CBCT were not significant (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the present study showed an acceptable accuracy of CBCT comparable to that of MDCT for measurement of the linear distance between the stapes and round window, and the incudostapedial joint thickness for cochlear implantation treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"19 4","pages":"697-703"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Accuracy of CBCT <i>Versus</i> MDCT for the Linear Distance between the Stapes and Round Window, and the Incudostapedial Joint Thickness for Cochlear Implantation Treatment Planning.\",\"authors\":\"Sanaz Sharifishoshtari, Nader Saki, Zohreh Roozbahani, Mohammad Ghasem Hanafi, Maryam Farasat, Zahra Saadi\",\"doi\":\"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the measurement accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the linear distance between the stapes and round window, and the incudostapedial joint thickness for cochlear implantation treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this in vitro study, 12 temporal bones along with their covering soft tissue underwent high-resolution (HR) and low-resolution (LR) CBCT and MDCT. The linear distance between the stapes and round window as well as the incudostapedial joint thickness were measured on images by an oral radiologist and a general radiologist. Data were analyzed by paired t-test, Wilcoxon test and Pearson's correlation test (alpha=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations and excellent agreement were noted between HR-CBCT and MDCT, HR-CBCT and LR-CBCT, and LR-CBCT and MDCT in both measurements (P<0.05). The mean distance between the stapes and round window on HR-CBCT was significantly higher than that on MDCT and LR-CBCT, and there were significant differences in the measurement accuracy of HR-CBCT with MDCT (P=0.014) and LR-CBCT (P=0.027). The difference between LR-CBCT and MDCT was not significant (P=0.102). The mean joint thickness on HR-CBCT was significantly higher than that on MDCT and the measurement accuracy of CBCT and MDCT was significantly different in this respect (P=0.014). The differences between LR-CBCT and MDCT, and HR-CBCT and LR-CBCT were not significant (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the present study showed an acceptable accuracy of CBCT comparable to that of MDCT for measurement of the linear distance between the stapes and round window, and the incudostapedial joint thickness for cochlear implantation treatment planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maedica\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"697-703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834848/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较锥形束ct (cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT)和多探测器ct (multi-detector computed tomography, MDCT)测量镫骨与圆窗之间的直线距离以及镫骨和镫骨关节厚度的精度,为人工耳蜗植入治疗方案提供参考。材料和方法:在本体外研究中,对12块颞骨及其覆盖的软组织进行高分辨率(HR)和低分辨率(LR) CBCT和MDCT扫描。由口腔放射科医生和普通放射科医生在图像上测量镫骨与圆窗之间的线性距离以及包括镫骨关节厚度。资料分析采用配对t检验、Wilcoxon检验和Pearson相关检验(α =0.05)。结果:HR-CBCT与MDCT、HR-CBCT与LR-CBCT、LR-CBCT与MDCT两种测量结果均具有显著的相关性和良好的一致性(p)。结论:本研究结果表明,CBCT在测量镫骨与圆窗之间的线性距离以及用于耳蜗植入治疗计划的镫骨关节厚度方面具有与MDCT相当的可接受的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement Accuracy of CBCT Versus MDCT for the Linear Distance between the Stapes and Round Window, and the Incudostapedial Joint Thickness for Cochlear Implantation Treatment Planning.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the measurement accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the linear distance between the stapes and round window, and the incudostapedial joint thickness for cochlear implantation treatment planning.

Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, 12 temporal bones along with their covering soft tissue underwent high-resolution (HR) and low-resolution (LR) CBCT and MDCT. The linear distance between the stapes and round window as well as the incudostapedial joint thickness were measured on images by an oral radiologist and a general radiologist. Data were analyzed by paired t-test, Wilcoxon test and Pearson's correlation test (alpha=0.05).

Results: Significant correlations and excellent agreement were noted between HR-CBCT and MDCT, HR-CBCT and LR-CBCT, and LR-CBCT and MDCT in both measurements (P<0.05). The mean distance between the stapes and round window on HR-CBCT was significantly higher than that on MDCT and LR-CBCT, and there were significant differences in the measurement accuracy of HR-CBCT with MDCT (P=0.014) and LR-CBCT (P=0.027). The difference between LR-CBCT and MDCT was not significant (P=0.102). The mean joint thickness on HR-CBCT was significantly higher than that on MDCT and the measurement accuracy of CBCT and MDCT was significantly different in this respect (P=0.014). The differences between LR-CBCT and MDCT, and HR-CBCT and LR-CBCT were not significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions: The results of the present study showed an acceptable accuracy of CBCT comparable to that of MDCT for measurement of the linear distance between the stapes and round window, and the incudostapedial joint thickness for cochlear implantation treatment planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信