Eline G M van Geffen, Tania C Sluckin, Marnix G Witte, Sanne-Marije J A Hazen, Femke P Peters, Martijn P W Intven, Pieter J Tanis, Miranda Kusters, Corrie A M Marijnen
{"title":"直肠癌患者侧室放射治疗的变化:更新国家指南后的结果。","authors":"Eline G M van Geffen, Tania C Sluckin, Marnix G Witte, Sanne-Marije J A Hazen, Femke P Peters, Martijn P W Intven, Pieter J Tanis, Miranda Kusters, Corrie A M Marijnen","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In rectal cancer, accurate delineation is crucial for patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes to minimize lateral local recurrence risk. This study aims to evaluate inter-physician variation in delineation of the lateral compartments, and the impact of training and implementation of standardized delineation protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three radiation oncologists from 15 institutes delineated the clinical target volume (CTV) on CT-scan in one example of a patient with rectal cancer. Parallel to this, the national consensus guideline was updated. Participating radiation oncologists completed an e-learning and online training session. Subsequently, 12 radiation oncologists re-delineated the same case. Variation was measured with the Dice-score and 95% Hausdorff distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considerable inter-physician variation was present before guideline distribution; and larger in the anterior compartment than the posterior compartment (Dice score 0.66 vs 0.80, p<0.01). After training, there was a significant improvement in 95% Hausdorff distance for the lateral compartments together (0.71 vs 1.02, p=0.02), but not in Dice score (0.76 vs 0.78, p=0.31), and neither for the anterior and posterior compartment separately. While delineation variation in the ventral and lateral sides decreased, the variation in the caudal side of the anterior compartment increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial delineation variation in CTV of the lateral compartments in rectal cancer cases exists. This can be reduced by implementation of a delineation guideline with clear anatomical borders and subsequent training. Despite reduction in 95% Hausdorff distance, there is still need for further improvement in specific areas to assure adequate delineation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in radiotherapy delineation of the lateral compartments in patients with rectal cancer: results after an updated national guideline.\",\"authors\":\"Eline G M van Geffen, Tania C Sluckin, Marnix G Witte, Sanne-Marije J A Hazen, Femke P Peters, Martijn P W Intven, Pieter J Tanis, Miranda Kusters, Corrie A M Marijnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2025.01.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In rectal cancer, accurate delineation is crucial for patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes to minimize lateral local recurrence risk. This study aims to evaluate inter-physician variation in delineation of the lateral compartments, and the impact of training and implementation of standardized delineation protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three radiation oncologists from 15 institutes delineated the clinical target volume (CTV) on CT-scan in one example of a patient with rectal cancer. Parallel to this, the national consensus guideline was updated. Participating radiation oncologists completed an e-learning and online training session. Subsequently, 12 radiation oncologists re-delineated the same case. Variation was measured with the Dice-score and 95% Hausdorff distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considerable inter-physician variation was present before guideline distribution; and larger in the anterior compartment than the posterior compartment (Dice score 0.66 vs 0.80, p<0.01). After training, there was a significant improvement in 95% Hausdorff distance for the lateral compartments together (0.71 vs 1.02, p=0.02), but not in Dice score (0.76 vs 0.78, p=0.31), and neither for the anterior and posterior compartment separately. While delineation variation in the ventral and lateral sides decreased, the variation in the caudal side of the anterior compartment increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial delineation variation in CTV of the lateral compartments in rectal cancer cases exists. This can be reduced by implementation of a delineation guideline with clear anatomical borders and subsequent training. Despite reduction in 95% Hausdorff distance, there is still need for further improvement in specific areas to assure adequate delineation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.01.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.01.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:在直肠癌中,准确的划定对于侧淋巴结肿大的患者来说是至关重要的,以减少侧局部复发的风险。本研究旨在评估医师之间在侧房室划分上的差异,以及标准化划分方案的培训和实施的影响。方法:来自15个研究所的23名放射肿瘤学家对1例直肠癌患者的ct扫描临床靶体积(CTV)进行了描述。与此同时,国家共识指南也得到了更新。参与的放射肿瘤学家完成了一个电子学习和在线培训课程。随后,12名放射肿瘤学家重新描述了同一病例。用Dice-score和95% Hausdorff距离测量变异。结果:在指南发布之前,医师之间存在相当大的差异;且前腔比后腔大(Dice评分0.66 vs 0.80, p)。结论:直肠癌患者侧腔的CTV存在明显的差异。这可以通过实施具有清晰解剖边界的描绘指南和随后的训练来减少。尽管减少了95%的Hausdorff距离,但在特定区域仍需要进一步改进以确保足够的圈定。
Variations in radiotherapy delineation of the lateral compartments in patients with rectal cancer: results after an updated national guideline.
Background and purpose: In rectal cancer, accurate delineation is crucial for patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes to minimize lateral local recurrence risk. This study aims to evaluate inter-physician variation in delineation of the lateral compartments, and the impact of training and implementation of standardized delineation protocols.
Methods: Twenty-three radiation oncologists from 15 institutes delineated the clinical target volume (CTV) on CT-scan in one example of a patient with rectal cancer. Parallel to this, the national consensus guideline was updated. Participating radiation oncologists completed an e-learning and online training session. Subsequently, 12 radiation oncologists re-delineated the same case. Variation was measured with the Dice-score and 95% Hausdorff distance.
Results: Considerable inter-physician variation was present before guideline distribution; and larger in the anterior compartment than the posterior compartment (Dice score 0.66 vs 0.80, p<0.01). After training, there was a significant improvement in 95% Hausdorff distance for the lateral compartments together (0.71 vs 1.02, p=0.02), but not in Dice score (0.76 vs 0.78, p=0.31), and neither for the anterior and posterior compartment separately. While delineation variation in the ventral and lateral sides decreased, the variation in the caudal side of the anterior compartment increased.
Conclusion: Substantial delineation variation in CTV of the lateral compartments in rectal cancer cases exists. This can be reduced by implementation of a delineation guideline with clear anatomical borders and subsequent training. Despite reduction in 95% Hausdorff distance, there is still need for further improvement in specific areas to assure adequate delineation.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.