加拿大HARMONY研究:改善患者对面部外观的满意度和综合美容治疗的心理影响。

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojae130
Jason K Rivers, Vince Bertucci, Channy Muhn, Shannon Humphrey, Nowell Solish, Jean Carruthers, William McGillivray, Meetu Bhogal, Julia K Garcia, Sara Sangha, Stephanie Manson Brown
{"title":"加拿大HARMONY研究:改善患者对面部外观的满意度和综合美容治疗的心理影响。","authors":"Jason K Rivers, Vince Bertucci, Channy Muhn, Shannon Humphrey, Nowell Solish, Jean Carruthers, William McGillivray, Meetu Bhogal, Julia K Garcia, Sara Sangha, Stephanie Manson Brown","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojae130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Panfacial treatment has the potential to positively impact psychosocial and emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Canada HARMONY study evaluated the satisfaction and psychosocial impact of comprehensive, multimodal aesthetic treatment of the face and submental area from the patient perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 12 months, all patients (<i>N</i> = 58) sequentially received treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, onabotulinumtoxinA, and medical-grade skincare products, and eligible patients (<i>n</i> = 13) also received ATX-101. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Scale. Secondary endpoints included the following assessments: FACE-Q Expectations of Life Change, Psychological Function, Social Function, Satisfaction with Skin, and Aging Appraisal Scales; Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS); and the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ). Safety was monitored throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline FACE-Q Expectations of Life Change scores indicated realistic treatment expectations. Significant improvements from baseline were observed on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance, Psychological Function, Social Function, Satisfaction with Skin, and Aging Appraisal Scales (<i>P</i> < .0001 for all endpoints). Most patients rated \"much improved\" on the GAIS. The mean PAAQ total score significantly improved from baseline by 32.6 (<i>P</i> < .0001). Most patients reported mild-to-moderate injection-site responses, which had a mean time to resolution of <14 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Panfacial aesthetic treatment consisting of HA fillers, onabotulinumtoxinA, and ATX-101 improved patient-reported satisfaction, psychological function, social function, and aging appraisal across validated measures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 5 therapeutic: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"7 ","pages":"ojae130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canada HARMONY Study: Improvements in Patient Satisfaction With Facial Appearance and Psychological Impact of Combined Aesthetic Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Jason K Rivers, Vince Bertucci, Channy Muhn, Shannon Humphrey, Nowell Solish, Jean Carruthers, William McGillivray, Meetu Bhogal, Julia K Garcia, Sara Sangha, Stephanie Manson Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asjof/ojae130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Panfacial treatment has the potential to positively impact psychosocial and emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Canada HARMONY study evaluated the satisfaction and psychosocial impact of comprehensive, multimodal aesthetic treatment of the face and submental area from the patient perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 12 months, all patients (<i>N</i> = 58) sequentially received treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, onabotulinumtoxinA, and medical-grade skincare products, and eligible patients (<i>n</i> = 13) also received ATX-101. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Scale. Secondary endpoints included the following assessments: FACE-Q Expectations of Life Change, Psychological Function, Social Function, Satisfaction with Skin, and Aging Appraisal Scales; Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS); and the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ). Safety was monitored throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline FACE-Q Expectations of Life Change scores indicated realistic treatment expectations. Significant improvements from baseline were observed on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance, Psychological Function, Social Function, Satisfaction with Skin, and Aging Appraisal Scales (<i>P</i> < .0001 for all endpoints). Most patients rated \\\"much improved\\\" on the GAIS. The mean PAAQ total score significantly improved from baseline by 32.6 (<i>P</i> < .0001). Most patients reported mild-to-moderate injection-site responses, which had a mean time to resolution of <14 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Panfacial aesthetic treatment consisting of HA fillers, onabotulinumtoxinA, and ATX-101 improved patient-reported satisfaction, psychological function, social function, and aging appraisal across validated measures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 5 therapeutic: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"ojae130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全面部治疗有可能对心理社会和情绪健康产生积极影响。目的:加拿大HARMONY研究从患者的角度评估面部和颏下区域综合、多模式美容治疗的满意度和心理社会影响。方法:在12个月的时间里,所有患者(N = 58)依次接受透明质酸(HA)填充剂、肉毒杆菌毒素和医疗级护肤品的治疗,符合条件的患者(N = 13)同时接受ATX-101治疗。主要终点是FACE-Q面部外观满意度量表的基线变化。次要终点包括以下评估:FACE-Q生活变化预期、心理功能、社会功能、皮肤满意度和衰老评估量表;全球审美改善量表;眶周美观外观问卷(PAAQ)。在整个研究过程中都对安全性进行了监测。结果:基线FACE-Q生活改变预期得分表明现实的治疗期望。在面部外观、心理功能、社会功能、皮肤满意度和衰老评估量表上,从基线观察到显著改善(所有终点P < 0.0001)。大多数患者的GAIS评分“大有改善”。平均PAAQ总分较基线显著提高32.6分(P < 0.0001)。大多数患者报告了轻度至中度的注射部位反应,平均时间到消退的时间。结论:由HA填充物、onabotulinumtoxinA和ATX-101组成的全面部美容治疗改善了患者报告的满意度、心理功能、社会功能和衰老评估。证据等级为5,具有治疗作用:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canada HARMONY Study: Improvements in Patient Satisfaction With Facial Appearance and Psychological Impact of Combined Aesthetic Treatment.

Background: Panfacial treatment has the potential to positively impact psychosocial and emotional well-being.

Objectives: The Canada HARMONY study evaluated the satisfaction and psychosocial impact of comprehensive, multimodal aesthetic treatment of the face and submental area from the patient perspective.

Methods: Over 12 months, all patients (N = 58) sequentially received treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, onabotulinumtoxinA, and medical-grade skincare products, and eligible patients (n = 13) also received ATX-101. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Scale. Secondary endpoints included the following assessments: FACE-Q Expectations of Life Change, Psychological Function, Social Function, Satisfaction with Skin, and Aging Appraisal Scales; Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS); and the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ). Safety was monitored throughout the study.

Results: Baseline FACE-Q Expectations of Life Change scores indicated realistic treatment expectations. Significant improvements from baseline were observed on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance, Psychological Function, Social Function, Satisfaction with Skin, and Aging Appraisal Scales (P < .0001 for all endpoints). Most patients rated "much improved" on the GAIS. The mean PAAQ total score significantly improved from baseline by 32.6 (P < .0001). Most patients reported mild-to-moderate injection-site responses, which had a mean time to resolution of <14 days.

Conclusions: Panfacial aesthetic treatment consisting of HA fillers, onabotulinumtoxinA, and ATX-101 improved patient-reported satisfaction, psychological function, social function, and aging appraisal across validated measures.

Level of evidence 5 therapeutic:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信