迈向子痫前期决定因素的概念框架的发展:社会决定因素的分层系统回顾。

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Kelly Pickerill, Sarina Prasad, Olivia Campbell, Jalila Devji, Lívia Vieira Lopes, Rosa Balleny, Terteel Elawad, Rachel Craik, Marie-Laure Volvert, Hiten D Mistry, Hannah Blencowe, Véronique Filippi, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A Magee, Marianne Vidler
{"title":"迈向子痫前期决定因素的概念框架的发展:社会决定因素的分层系统回顾。","authors":"Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Kelly Pickerill, Sarina Prasad, Olivia Campbell, Jalila Devji, Lívia Vieira Lopes, Rosa Balleny, Terteel Elawad, Rachel Craik, Marie-Laure Volvert, Hiten D Mistry, Hannah Blencowe, Véronique Filippi, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A Magee, Marianne Vidler","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing reviews of pre-eclampsia determinants have focused on clinical and genetic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate social determinants for pre-eclampsia prevention.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted from relevant electronic databases from inception of each database to 30th December 2024.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Reviews and large cohort studies (≥ 1000 participants), published between 2013 and 2024, reporting quantitative associations between social determinant exposures and pre-eclampsia outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Titles and abstracts, then relevant full-texts were reviewed by two reviewers, independently. Strength of association was evaluated as 'definite' (odds ratios [OR] or relative risk [RR] ≥ 3.00 or < 0.33), 'probable' (OR or RR 1.50-2.99 or 0.33-0.67), 'possible' (OR or RR 1.10-1.49 or 0.68-0.89), or 'unlikely' (OR or RR 0.90-1.09). Quality of the evidence was high, moderate, low, or very-low, using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Twenty-seven publications found 24 associations of pre-eclampsia with socioeconomic status, social support/exclusion, healthcare access, and occupational and physical environmental factors. One association (polygamy) was definite (low-quality evidence). Probable associations included: work stress, lack of antenatal care and heat exposure in early pregnancy (high-quality evidence); prolonged occupational exposure to whole body vibrations or bending, distance to health facility, and UV-B radiation exposure (protective factor), all based on moderate-quality evidence; and neighbourhood deprivation, rotating work shifts, and Asian/Oceanian origins (protective factor), all based on low-quality evidence. There were 13 possible associations, which did not include education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support recommendations to address climate change, strengthen occupational protection, and promote early antenatal attendance. Social determinants may be indicative of upstream factors (e.g., obesity) that increase likelihood of clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence and severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the Development of a Conceptual Framework of the Determinants of Pre-Eclampsia: A Hierarchical Systematic Review of Social Determinants.\",\"authors\":\"Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Kelly Pickerill, Sarina Prasad, Olivia Campbell, Jalila Devji, Lívia Vieira Lopes, Rosa Balleny, Terteel Elawad, Rachel Craik, Marie-Laure Volvert, Hiten D Mistry, Hannah Blencowe, Véronique Filippi, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A Magee, Marianne Vidler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing reviews of pre-eclampsia determinants have focused on clinical and genetic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate social determinants for pre-eclampsia prevention.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted from relevant electronic databases from inception of each database to 30th December 2024.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Reviews and large cohort studies (≥ 1000 participants), published between 2013 and 2024, reporting quantitative associations between social determinant exposures and pre-eclampsia outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Titles and abstracts, then relevant full-texts were reviewed by two reviewers, independently. Strength of association was evaluated as 'definite' (odds ratios [OR] or relative risk [RR] ≥ 3.00 or < 0.33), 'probable' (OR or RR 1.50-2.99 or 0.33-0.67), 'possible' (OR or RR 1.10-1.49 or 0.68-0.89), or 'unlikely' (OR or RR 0.90-1.09). Quality of the evidence was high, moderate, low, or very-low, using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Twenty-seven publications found 24 associations of pre-eclampsia with socioeconomic status, social support/exclusion, healthcare access, and occupational and physical environmental factors. One association (polygamy) was definite (low-quality evidence). Probable associations included: work stress, lack of antenatal care and heat exposure in early pregnancy (high-quality evidence); prolonged occupational exposure to whole body vibrations or bending, distance to health facility, and UV-B radiation exposure (protective factor), all based on moderate-quality evidence; and neighbourhood deprivation, rotating work shifts, and Asian/Oceanian origins (protective factor), all based on low-quality evidence. There were 13 possible associations, which did not include education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support recommendations to address climate change, strengthen occupational protection, and promote early antenatal attendance. Social determinants may be indicative of upstream factors (e.g., obesity) that increase likelihood of clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence and severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对先兆子痫决定因素的现有综述主要集中在临床和遗传风险因素上。目的:探讨预防子痫前期的社会因素。检索策略:从各数据库建立至2024年12月30日,对相关电子数据库进行系统检索。选择标准:2013年至2024年间发表的综述和大型队列研究(≥1000名参与者),报告社会决定因素暴露与子痫前期结局之间的定量关联。资料收集和分析:题目和摘要,相关全文由两名审稿人独立审阅。关联强度评估为“明确”(比值比[OR]或相对危险度[RR]≥3.00)或主要结果:27篇出版物发现24例先兆子痫与社会经济地位、社会支持/排斥、医疗保健获取、职业和物理环境因素相关。一个关联(一夫多妻制)是明确的(低质量证据)。可能的关联包括:工作压力、缺乏产前护理和妊娠早期热暴露(高质量证据);长时间的职业暴露于全身振动或弯曲、与卫生设施的距离以及UV-B辐射暴露(保护因素),所有这些都基于中等质量的证据;邻里剥夺、轮班工作和亚洲/大洋洲血统(保护因素),这些都是基于低质量的证据。有13种可能的关联,其中不包括教育。结论:我们的研究结果支持应对气候变化、加强职业保护和促进早期产前护理的建议。社会决定因素可能指示上游因素(如肥胖)增加子痫前期发病率和严重程度的临床危险因素的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards the Development of a Conceptual Framework of the Determinants of Pre-Eclampsia: A Hierarchical Systematic Review of Social Determinants.

Background: Existing reviews of pre-eclampsia determinants have focused on clinical and genetic risk factors.

Objective: To evaluate social determinants for pre-eclampsia prevention.

Search strategy: Systematic searches were conducted from relevant electronic databases from inception of each database to 30th December 2024.

Selection criteria: Reviews and large cohort studies (≥ 1000 participants), published between 2013 and 2024, reporting quantitative associations between social determinant exposures and pre-eclampsia outcomes.

Data collection and analysis: Titles and abstracts, then relevant full-texts were reviewed by two reviewers, independently. Strength of association was evaluated as 'definite' (odds ratios [OR] or relative risk [RR] ≥ 3.00 or < 0.33), 'probable' (OR or RR 1.50-2.99 or 0.33-0.67), 'possible' (OR or RR 1.10-1.49 or 0.68-0.89), or 'unlikely' (OR or RR 0.90-1.09). Quality of the evidence was high, moderate, low, or very-low, using GRADE.

Main results: Twenty-seven publications found 24 associations of pre-eclampsia with socioeconomic status, social support/exclusion, healthcare access, and occupational and physical environmental factors. One association (polygamy) was definite (low-quality evidence). Probable associations included: work stress, lack of antenatal care and heat exposure in early pregnancy (high-quality evidence); prolonged occupational exposure to whole body vibrations or bending, distance to health facility, and UV-B radiation exposure (protective factor), all based on moderate-quality evidence; and neighbourhood deprivation, rotating work shifts, and Asian/Oceanian origins (protective factor), all based on low-quality evidence. There were 13 possible associations, which did not include education.

Conclusion: Our findings support recommendations to address climate change, strengthen occupational protection, and promote early antenatal attendance. Social determinants may be indicative of upstream factors (e.g., obesity) that increase likelihood of clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence and severity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信