mNUTRIC评分对脓毒症合并ARDS慢性危重症患者的预测价值。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Technology and Health Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1177/09287329241296430
Mingxia Ji, Linlin Zhu, Mengyan Chen, Yi Wang, Weiyong Qiu, Ning Zhang
{"title":"mNUTRIC评分对脓毒症合并ARDS慢性危重症患者的预测价值。","authors":"Mingxia Ji, Linlin Zhu, Mengyan Chen, Yi Wang, Weiyong Qiu, Ning Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09287329241296430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of the modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) for patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing into chronic critical illness (CCI).BackgroundSepsis is an important risk factor for Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and sepsis induced ARDS accounts for 32% of patients. Patients with this subtype of ARDS have a worse prognosis than those with sepsis alone or ARDS, usually facing higher mortality rates and lower success rates of extubation, and have received more attention in clinical practice.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on 118 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2020 to May 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups: CCI and rapid recovery (RAP), based on the occurrence of CCI. Age, gender, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, albumin, serum creatinine, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), mNUTRIC score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were compared between the two groups. The association between mNUTRIC and CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS was further examined using three models and multivariate logistic regression.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to analyze the predictive values of mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, and APACHE II score for predicting the occurrence of CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS.ResultsThe age, mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, APACHE II score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and CRRT ratio were significantly higher in the CCI group compared to the RAP group (all P < 0.05). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences in white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and albumin levels between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the mNUTRIC score as an independent risk factor for CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS. The constructed models showed that the mNUTRIC score remained significant, while the SOFA score and APACHE II score did not.The area under the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the mNUTRIC score had the highest AUC of 0.880, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.808-0.933. The AUC for the SOFA score was 0.864, and for the APACHE II score was 0.825, all of which were statistically significant.ConclusionsThe mNUTRIC score is valuable in predicting the progression of sepsis combined with ARDS to CCI, and may even be superior to the SOFA score and APACHE II score.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"831-837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of mNUTRIC score for chronic critical illness in patients of sepsis complicated with ARDS.\",\"authors\":\"Mingxia Ji, Linlin Zhu, Mengyan Chen, Yi Wang, Weiyong Qiu, Ning Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329241296430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of the modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) for patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing into chronic critical illness (CCI).BackgroundSepsis is an important risk factor for Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and sepsis induced ARDS accounts for 32% of patients. Patients with this subtype of ARDS have a worse prognosis than those with sepsis alone or ARDS, usually facing higher mortality rates and lower success rates of extubation, and have received more attention in clinical practice.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on 118 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2020 to May 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups: CCI and rapid recovery (RAP), based on the occurrence of CCI. Age, gender, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, albumin, serum creatinine, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), mNUTRIC score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were compared between the two groups. The association between mNUTRIC and CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS was further examined using three models and multivariate logistic regression.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to analyze the predictive values of mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, and APACHE II score for predicting the occurrence of CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS.ResultsThe age, mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, APACHE II score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and CRRT ratio were significantly higher in the CCI group compared to the RAP group (all P < 0.05). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences in white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and albumin levels between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the mNUTRIC score as an independent risk factor for CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS. The constructed models showed that the mNUTRIC score remained significant, while the SOFA score and APACHE II score did not.The area under the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the mNUTRIC score had the highest AUC of 0.880, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.808-0.933. The AUC for the SOFA score was 0.864, and for the APACHE II score was 0.825, all of which were statistically significant.ConclusionsThe mNUTRIC score is valuable in predicting the progression of sepsis combined with ARDS to CCI, and may even be superior to the SOFA score and APACHE II score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"831-837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241296430\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241296430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨危重症修正营养风险(mNUTRIC)对脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发展为慢性危重症(CCI)患者的预测价值。方法:对2020年1月至2022年5月义乌市中心医院重症监护室(ICU)收治的118例患者进行回顾性观察研究。根据CCI的发生情况将患者分为CCI组和快速恢复组(RAP)。比较两组患者的年龄、性别、白细胞计数、c反应蛋白、白蛋白、血清肌酐、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)、mNUTRIC评分、ICU住院时间、机械通气时间、持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)。采用三种模型和多因素logistic回归进一步探讨脓毒症合并ARDS患者的mNUTRIC与CCI之间的关系。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析mNUTRIC评分、SOFA评分、APACHE II评分对脓毒症合并ARDS患者CCI发生的预测价值。结果:CCI组患者的年龄、mNUTRIC评分、SOFA评分、APACHEⅱ评分、ICU住院时间、机械通气时间、CRRT比均显著高于RAP组(P < 0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析发现,mNUTRIC评分是脓毒症合并ARDS患者CCI的独立危险因素。构建的模型显示,mNUTRIC评分仍然显著,而SOFA评分和APACHE II评分则不显著。ROC曲线下面积分析显示,mNUTRIC评分的AUC最高,为0.880,95%可信区间(CI)为0.808 ~ 0.933。SOFA评分的AUC为0.864,APACHE II评分的AUC为0.825,差异均有统计学意义。结论:mNUTRIC评分在预测脓毒症合并ARDS向CCI的进展方面具有一定的价值,甚至可能优于SOFA评分和APACHE II评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive value of mNUTRIC score for chronic critical illness in patients of sepsis complicated with ARDS.

ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of the modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) for patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing into chronic critical illness (CCI).BackgroundSepsis is an important risk factor for Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and sepsis induced ARDS accounts for 32% of patients. Patients with this subtype of ARDS have a worse prognosis than those with sepsis alone or ARDS, usually facing higher mortality rates and lower success rates of extubation, and have received more attention in clinical practice.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on 118 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2020 to May 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups: CCI and rapid recovery (RAP), based on the occurrence of CCI. Age, gender, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, albumin, serum creatinine, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), mNUTRIC score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were compared between the two groups. The association between mNUTRIC and CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS was further examined using three models and multivariate logistic regression.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to analyze the predictive values of mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, and APACHE II score for predicting the occurrence of CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS.ResultsThe age, mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, APACHE II score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and CRRT ratio were significantly higher in the CCI group compared to the RAP group (all P < 0.05). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences in white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and albumin levels between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the mNUTRIC score as an independent risk factor for CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS. The constructed models showed that the mNUTRIC score remained significant, while the SOFA score and APACHE II score did not.The area under the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the mNUTRIC score had the highest AUC of 0.880, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.808-0.933. The AUC for the SOFA score was 0.864, and for the APACHE II score was 0.825, all of which were statistically significant.ConclusionsThe mNUTRIC score is valuable in predicting the progression of sepsis combined with ARDS to CCI, and may even be superior to the SOFA score and APACHE II score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信