利用人工智能和大型语言模型支持健康科学图书馆的馆藏发展。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ivan Portillo, David Carson
{"title":"利用人工智能和大型语言模型支持健康科学图书馆的馆藏发展。","authors":"Ivan Portillo, David Carson","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.2079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project investigated the potential of generative AI models in aiding health sciences librarians with collection development. Researchers at Chapman University's Harry and Diane Rinker Health Science campus evaluated four generative AI models-ChatGPT 4.0, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot-over six months starting in March 2024. Two prompts were used: one to generate recent eBook titles in specific health sciences fields and another to identify subject gaps in the existing collection. The first prompt revealed inconsistencies across models, with Copilot and Perplexity providing sources but also inaccuracies. The second prompt yielded more useful results, with all models offering helpful analysis and accurate Library of Congress call numbers. The findings suggest that Large Language Models (LLMs) are not yet reliable as primary tools for collection development due to inaccuracies and hallucinations. However, they can serve as supplementary tools for analyzing subject coverage and identifying gaps in health sciences collections.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"113 1","pages":"92-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the most of Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models to support collection development in health sciences libraries.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Portillo, David Carson\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/jmla.2025.2079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This project investigated the potential of generative AI models in aiding health sciences librarians with collection development. Researchers at Chapman University's Harry and Diane Rinker Health Science campus evaluated four generative AI models-ChatGPT 4.0, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot-over six months starting in March 2024. Two prompts were used: one to generate recent eBook titles in specific health sciences fields and another to identify subject gaps in the existing collection. The first prompt revealed inconsistencies across models, with Copilot and Perplexity providing sources but also inaccuracies. The second prompt yielded more useful results, with all models offering helpful analysis and accurate Library of Congress call numbers. The findings suggest that Large Language Models (LLMs) are not yet reliable as primary tools for collection development due to inaccuracies and hallucinations. However, they can serve as supplementary tools for analyzing subject coverage and identifying gaps in health sciences collections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Library Association\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"92-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Library Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.2079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.2079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该项目研究了生成式人工智能模型在帮助健康科学图书馆员进行馆藏开发方面的潜力。从2024年3月开始,查普曼大学Harry和Diane Rinker健康科学校区的研究人员在六个多月的时间里评估了四种生成式人工智能模型——chatgpt 4.0、谷歌Gemini、Perplexity和Microsoft copilot。使用了两个提示:一个用于生成特定健康科学领域的最新电子书标题,另一个用于识别现有集合中的主题空白。第一个提示揭示了模型之间的不一致,Copilot和Perplexity提供了来源,但也不准确。第二个提示产生了更有用的结果,所有模型都提供了有用的分析和准确的国会图书馆电话号码。研究结果表明,由于不准确和幻觉,大型语言模型(llm)作为集合开发的主要工具尚不可靠。然而,它们可以作为分析学科覆盖范围和确定卫生科学收藏差距的补充工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making the most of Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models to support collection development in health sciences libraries.

This project investigated the potential of generative AI models in aiding health sciences librarians with collection development. Researchers at Chapman University's Harry and Diane Rinker Health Science campus evaluated four generative AI models-ChatGPT 4.0, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot-over six months starting in March 2024. Two prompts were used: one to generate recent eBook titles in specific health sciences fields and another to identify subject gaps in the existing collection. The first prompt revealed inconsistencies across models, with Copilot and Perplexity providing sources but also inaccuracies. The second prompt yielded more useful results, with all models offering helpful analysis and accurate Library of Congress call numbers. The findings suggest that Large Language Models (LLMs) are not yet reliable as primary tools for collection development due to inaccuracies and hallucinations. However, they can serve as supplementary tools for analyzing subject coverage and identifying gaps in health sciences collections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信