了解社区对促进澳大利亚跨性别和性别多样化人群献血的看法。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1111/vox.70001
Rachel Thorpe, Kyle Jensen, Barbara Masser, Peter Bentley, Tarin Dryden, Eleanor Forrest, Andy Kaladelfos, Travis Larcombe, Tanya Pastor, Aaron Saint-James, Shauna Wilson, Bridget Haire
{"title":"了解社区对促进澳大利亚跨性别和性别多样化人群献血的看法。","authors":"Rachel Thorpe, Kyle Jensen, Barbara Masser, Peter Bentley, Tarin Dryden, Eleanor Forrest, Andy Kaladelfos, Travis Larcombe, Tanya Pastor, Aaron Saint-James, Shauna Wilson, Bridget Haire","doi":"10.1111/vox.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Trans and gender-diverse people who wish to donate blood face significant barriers with policies and procedures differing across countries. It remains critical to explore the experiences and perspectives of trans and gender-diverse people in different locations to understand challenges in local systems. We undertook a qualitative study focussed on procedures and processes affecting trans and gender-diverse people in Australia, and their views about needed change.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Stakeholders collaborated with the researchers to refine the focus of and design the research. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 trans and gender-diverse people who were current, past or potential donors. The interviews comprised open-ended questions about donation experiences, knowledge of current policies and procedures and preferences for change. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported varied and inconsistent donation experiences. When compared with current practice, participants preferred a two-step approach to donor registration that asks for sex reported at birth followed by gender identity. However, they also expressed concern that the two-step approach could deter new donors and stressed the importance of only collecting information relevant to eligibility assessment. Participants were supportive of a gender-neutral approach to assess eligibility to donate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights significant barriers and procedural inconsistencies for trans and gender-diverse individuals when (considering) donating blood. We recommend more inclusive practices including clear communication about data use, rigorous staff training on gender diversity, registration processes that respect all gender identities and adopting a gender-neutral approach to donor screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":"447-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding community perspectives for advancing inclusion of trans and gender-diverse people in blood donation in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Thorpe, Kyle Jensen, Barbara Masser, Peter Bentley, Tarin Dryden, Eleanor Forrest, Andy Kaladelfos, Travis Larcombe, Tanya Pastor, Aaron Saint-James, Shauna Wilson, Bridget Haire\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vox.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Trans and gender-diverse people who wish to donate blood face significant barriers with policies and procedures differing across countries. It remains critical to explore the experiences and perspectives of trans and gender-diverse people in different locations to understand challenges in local systems. We undertook a qualitative study focussed on procedures and processes affecting trans and gender-diverse people in Australia, and their views about needed change.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Stakeholders collaborated with the researchers to refine the focus of and design the research. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 trans and gender-diverse people who were current, past or potential donors. The interviews comprised open-ended questions about donation experiences, knowledge of current policies and procedures and preferences for change. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported varied and inconsistent donation experiences. When compared with current practice, participants preferred a two-step approach to donor registration that asks for sex reported at birth followed by gender identity. However, they also expressed concern that the two-step approach could deter new donors and stressed the importance of only collecting information relevant to eligibility assessment. Participants were supportive of a gender-neutral approach to assess eligibility to donate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights significant barriers and procedural inconsistencies for trans and gender-diverse individuals when (considering) donating blood. We recommend more inclusive practices including clear communication about data use, rigorous staff training on gender diversity, registration processes that respect all gender identities and adopting a gender-neutral approach to donor screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"447-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:由于各国的政策和程序不同,希望献血的跨性别者和性别多样化者面临重大障碍。探索不同地区的跨性别者和性别多样化者的经历和观点,以了解当地系统面临的挑战,这一点仍然至关重要。我们进行了一项定性研究,重点关注影响澳大利亚跨性别者和性别多样化者的程序和过程,以及他们对需要改变的看法。材料和方法:利益相关者与研究人员合作,完善研究的重点和设计。对14名跨性别者和性别多样化的人进行了半结构化访谈,这些人现在、过去或潜在的捐赠者。访谈包括关于捐赠经历、对现行政策和程序的了解以及对变革的偏好等开放式问题。访谈采用专题分析进行分析。结果:参与者报告了不同且不一致的捐赠经历。与目前的做法相比,参与者更喜欢捐献者登记的两步方法,即要求出生时报告的性别,然后是性别认同。但是,他们也表示关切的是,两步办法可能会阻止新的捐助者,并强调只收集与资格评估有关的资料的重要性。与会者支持以性别中立的方式评估捐赠资格。结论:我们的研究突出了跨性别者和性别多样化者在考虑献血时面临的重大障碍和程序不一致。我们建议采取更具包容性的做法,包括就数据使用进行明确沟通,对工作人员进行严格的性别多样性培训,尊重所有性别认同的登记流程,以及在捐赠者筛选中采用性别中立的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding community perspectives for advancing inclusion of trans and gender-diverse people in blood donation in Australia.

Background and objectives: Trans and gender-diverse people who wish to donate blood face significant barriers with policies and procedures differing across countries. It remains critical to explore the experiences and perspectives of trans and gender-diverse people in different locations to understand challenges in local systems. We undertook a qualitative study focussed on procedures and processes affecting trans and gender-diverse people in Australia, and their views about needed change.

Materials and methods: Stakeholders collaborated with the researchers to refine the focus of and design the research. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 trans and gender-diverse people who were current, past or potential donors. The interviews comprised open-ended questions about donation experiences, knowledge of current policies and procedures and preferences for change. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Participants reported varied and inconsistent donation experiences. When compared with current practice, participants preferred a two-step approach to donor registration that asks for sex reported at birth followed by gender identity. However, they also expressed concern that the two-step approach could deter new donors and stressed the importance of only collecting information relevant to eligibility assessment. Participants were supportive of a gender-neutral approach to assess eligibility to donate.

Conclusion: Our study highlights significant barriers and procedural inconsistencies for trans and gender-diverse individuals when (considering) donating blood. We recommend more inclusive practices including clear communication about data use, rigorous staff training on gender diversity, registration processes that respect all gender identities and adopting a gender-neutral approach to donor screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信