{"title":"电子门静脉成像装置头颈部放射治疗的分段设置不确定度评估及CTV-PTV适度计算。","authors":"Elham Ahmadi, Azam Eskandari, Mohammad Mohammadi, Maryam Naji, Shahrokh Naseri, Hamid Gholamhosseinian","doi":"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of treatment-associated errors is important in the radiotherapy process, particularly those resulting related to patient setup.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research aimed to assess the interfractional setup errors and determine the Clinical Target Volume to Planning Target Volume (CTV to PTV) margin in patients undergoing 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) for head and neck cancer by means of electronic portal imaging device.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this analytical study, 300 portal images were acquired from 50 patients undergoing 3DCRT for head and neck cancer. Using the portal images of Lateral (LAT) and Antero-Posterior (AP) fields, population systematic (∑) and random (σ) errors were obtained in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions. Finally, based on the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 62's, Stroom's and Van Herk's methods, Planning target volume margins were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translational shift ranges were 0-8.1 mm in the ML, 0-9 mm in the SI (AP), 0-8.8 mm in the SI (LAT), and 0-10 mm in the AP directions. The population systematic and random errors were respectively 3.230, 2.753, and 2.997 mm, and 1.476, 1.853, and 1.715 mm in X, Y, and Z directions. The calculated PTV margins using the ICRU-62, Stroom's, and Van Herk's formulae were ranging from 3.236-3.551, 6.605-7.493, and 7.932-9.108 mm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A PTV margin of 7.5-9.5 mm seems safe for ensuring adequate treatment volume coverage. In addition, the EPID is an effective equipment for verifying patient positioning and reducing treatment setup errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":38035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","volume":"15 1","pages":"5-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Interfractional Setup Uncertainties and Calculation of Adequate CTV-PTV Margin for Head and Neck Radiotherapy using Electronic Portal Imaging Device.\",\"authors\":\"Elham Ahmadi, Azam Eskandari, Mohammad Mohammadi, Maryam Naji, Shahrokh Naseri, Hamid Gholamhosseinian\",\"doi\":\"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of treatment-associated errors is important in the radiotherapy process, particularly those resulting related to patient setup.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research aimed to assess the interfractional setup errors and determine the Clinical Target Volume to Planning Target Volume (CTV to PTV) margin in patients undergoing 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) for head and neck cancer by means of electronic portal imaging device.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this analytical study, 300 portal images were acquired from 50 patients undergoing 3DCRT for head and neck cancer. Using the portal images of Lateral (LAT) and Antero-Posterior (AP) fields, population systematic (∑) and random (σ) errors were obtained in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions. Finally, based on the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 62's, Stroom's and Van Herk's methods, Planning target volume margins were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translational shift ranges were 0-8.1 mm in the ML, 0-9 mm in the SI (AP), 0-8.8 mm in the SI (LAT), and 0-10 mm in the AP directions. The population systematic and random errors were respectively 3.230, 2.753, and 2.997 mm, and 1.476, 1.853, and 1.715 mm in X, Y, and Z directions. The calculated PTV margins using the ICRU-62, Stroom's, and Van Herk's formulae were ranging from 3.236-3.551, 6.605-7.493, and 7.932-9.108 mm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A PTV margin of 7.5-9.5 mm seems safe for ensuring adequate treatment volume coverage. In addition, the EPID is an effective equipment for verifying patient positioning and reducing treatment setup errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"5-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:治疗相关错误的评估在放疗过程中很重要,特别是那些与患者设置相关的错误。目的:探讨头颈部肿瘤三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)患者应用电子门静脉显像仪进行三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)时的分时段设置误差,确定临床靶体积与计划靶体积(CTV to PTV)差值。材料和方法:本分析研究收集了50例接受3DCRT治疗的头颈癌患者的300张门静脉图像。利用横向场(LAT)和前后场(AP)的门静脉图像,得到横向、纵向和垂直方向的总体系统误差(∑)和随机误差(σ)。最后,根据国际辐射单位和测量委员会(ICRU) 62号报告、Stroom和Van Herk的方法,确定了规划目标体积边际。结果:平移幅度为ML方向0 ~ 8.1 mm, SI (AP)方向0 ~ 9 mm, SI (LAT)方向0 ~ 8.8 mm, AP方向0 ~ 10 mm。在X、Y和Z方向上,总体系统误差和随机误差分别为3.230、2.753和2.997 mm, 1.476、1.853和1.715 mm。采用ICRU-62、Stroom’s和Van Herk’s公式计算的PTV裕度分别为3.236 ~ 3.551、6.605 ~ 7.493和7.932 ~ 9.108 mm。结论:7.5-9.5 mm的PTV裕度对于确保足够的治疗体积覆盖是安全的。此外,EPID是验证患者体位和减少治疗设置错误的有效设备。
Evaluation of Interfractional Setup Uncertainties and Calculation of Adequate CTV-PTV Margin for Head and Neck Radiotherapy using Electronic Portal Imaging Device.
Background: The evaluation of treatment-associated errors is important in the radiotherapy process, particularly those resulting related to patient setup.
Objective: This research aimed to assess the interfractional setup errors and determine the Clinical Target Volume to Planning Target Volume (CTV to PTV) margin in patients undergoing 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) for head and neck cancer by means of electronic portal imaging device.
Material and methods: In this analytical study, 300 portal images were acquired from 50 patients undergoing 3DCRT for head and neck cancer. Using the portal images of Lateral (LAT) and Antero-Posterior (AP) fields, population systematic (∑) and random (σ) errors were obtained in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions. Finally, based on the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 62's, Stroom's and Van Herk's methods, Planning target volume margins were determined.
Results: The translational shift ranges were 0-8.1 mm in the ML, 0-9 mm in the SI (AP), 0-8.8 mm in the SI (LAT), and 0-10 mm in the AP directions. The population systematic and random errors were respectively 3.230, 2.753, and 2.997 mm, and 1.476, 1.853, and 1.715 mm in X, Y, and Z directions. The calculated PTV margins using the ICRU-62, Stroom's, and Van Herk's formulae were ranging from 3.236-3.551, 6.605-7.493, and 7.932-9.108 mm, respectively.
Conclusion: A PTV margin of 7.5-9.5 mm seems safe for ensuring adequate treatment volume coverage. In addition, the EPID is an effective equipment for verifying patient positioning and reducing treatment setup errors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (JBPE) is a bimonthly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research (experimental or theoretical) broadly concerned with the relationship of physics to medicine and engineering.