哺乳动物全脑连接组学成像方法的比较展望。

IF 4.3 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Cell Reports Methods Pub Date : 2025-02-24 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.100988
Logan Thrasher Collins, Todd Huffman, Randal Koene
{"title":"哺乳动物全脑连接组学成像方法的比较展望。","authors":"Logan Thrasher Collins, Todd Huffman, Randal Koene","doi":"10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mammalian whole-brain connectomes are a foundational ingredient for a holistic understanding of brains. Indeed, imaging connectomes at sufficient resolution to densely reconstruct cellular morphology and synapses represents a long-standing goal in neuroscience. Mouse connectomes could soon come within reach, while human connectomes remain a more distant yet still worthy goal. Though the technologies needed to reconstruct whole-brain connectomes have not yet reached full maturity, they are advancing rapidly. Close examination of these technologies may help plan connectomics projects. Here, we quantitatively compare imaging technologies that have the potential to enable whole-brain mammalian connectomics. We perform calculations on electron microscopy (EM) techniques and expansion light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (ExLSFM) methods. We consider techniques that have sufficient resolution to identify all synapses and sufficient speed to be relevant for whole mammalian brains. We offer this analysis as a resource for those considering how to organize efforts toward imaging whole-brain mammalian connectomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":29773,"journal":{"name":"Cell Reports Methods","volume":" ","pages":"100988"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative prospects of imaging methods for whole-brain mammalian connectomics.\",\"authors\":\"Logan Thrasher Collins, Todd Huffman, Randal Koene\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.100988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mammalian whole-brain connectomes are a foundational ingredient for a holistic understanding of brains. Indeed, imaging connectomes at sufficient resolution to densely reconstruct cellular morphology and synapses represents a long-standing goal in neuroscience. Mouse connectomes could soon come within reach, while human connectomes remain a more distant yet still worthy goal. Though the technologies needed to reconstruct whole-brain connectomes have not yet reached full maturity, they are advancing rapidly. Close examination of these technologies may help plan connectomics projects. Here, we quantitatively compare imaging technologies that have the potential to enable whole-brain mammalian connectomics. We perform calculations on electron microscopy (EM) techniques and expansion light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (ExLSFM) methods. We consider techniques that have sufficient resolution to identify all synapses and sufficient speed to be relevant for whole mammalian brains. We offer this analysis as a resource for those considering how to organize efforts toward imaging whole-brain mammalian connectomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Reports Methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Reports Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.100988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Reports Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.100988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哺乳动物全脑连接体是全面了解大脑的基础成分。事实上,以足够的分辨率对连接体进行成像,以密集地重建细胞形态和突触,是神经科学长期以来的目标。老鼠的连接体可能很快就能实现,而人类的连接体仍然是一个遥远但仍有价值的目标。尽管重建全脑连接体所需的技术尚未完全成熟,但它们正在迅速发展。仔细研究这些技术可能有助于规划连接组学项目。在这里,我们定量比较成像技术有潜力实现全脑哺乳动物连接组学。我们对电子显微镜(EM)技术和扩展光片荧光显微镜(ExLSFM)方法进行计算。我们考虑的技术有足够的分辨率来识别所有突触和足够的速度,以适用于整个哺乳动物的大脑。我们提供这一分析作为资源,为那些考虑如何组织努力成像全脑哺乳动物连接体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative prospects of imaging methods for whole-brain mammalian connectomics.

Mammalian whole-brain connectomes are a foundational ingredient for a holistic understanding of brains. Indeed, imaging connectomes at sufficient resolution to densely reconstruct cellular morphology and synapses represents a long-standing goal in neuroscience. Mouse connectomes could soon come within reach, while human connectomes remain a more distant yet still worthy goal. Though the technologies needed to reconstruct whole-brain connectomes have not yet reached full maturity, they are advancing rapidly. Close examination of these technologies may help plan connectomics projects. Here, we quantitatively compare imaging technologies that have the potential to enable whole-brain mammalian connectomics. We perform calculations on electron microscopy (EM) techniques and expansion light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (ExLSFM) methods. We consider techniques that have sufficient resolution to identify all synapses and sufficient speed to be relevant for whole mammalian brains. We offer this analysis as a resource for those considering how to organize efforts toward imaging whole-brain mammalian connectomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Reports Methods
Cell Reports Methods Chemistry (General), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (General), Immunology and Microbiology (General)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
111 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信