择期治疗尿石症的时间敏感因素:叙述性回顾。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-596
Gino Pigatto Filho, Sandro Augusto Nichele, Flávia Vargas de Oliveira, Luiz Sergio Santos, Rogério de Fraga
{"title":"择期治疗尿石症的时间敏感因素:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Gino Pigatto Filho, Sandro Augusto Nichele, Flávia Vargas de Oliveira, Luiz Sergio Santos, Rogério de Fraga","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Managing surgical queues for urinary lithiasis is a persistent challenge in healthcare systems. Despite substantial research in this area, clear criteria for prioritizing patients and determining those who can safely wait longer without complications remain elusive. This review aims to develop a rational framework for optimizing surgical queue management in urinary stone treatment by analyzing primary literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review of relevant guidelines, held departmental discussions to identify additional factors, and performed an extensive PubMed search using key terms related to queue management and expectant care in lithiasis.</p><p><strong>Key contents and findings: </strong>Significant factors identified include stone volume and location, presence of hydronephrosis, patient frailty and comorbidities, recurrent urinary infections, nephrostomy or double-J stent, urinary diversion, high occupational risk, limited healthcare access, and refractory pain impacting quality of life. A detailed analysis of these factors is presented in the article.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective management of surgical waitlists for urinary lithiasis requires a comprehensive assessment of factors such as stone characteristics, hydronephrosis, patient frailty, comorbidities, infections, drainage devices, accessibility, and quality of life, as prioritization based solely on waiting time is insufficient and potentially harmful.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 1","pages":"181-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-sensitive elements in elective treatment of urinary lithiasis: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Gino Pigatto Filho, Sandro Augusto Nichele, Flávia Vargas de Oliveira, Luiz Sergio Santos, Rogério de Fraga\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-24-596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Managing surgical queues for urinary lithiasis is a persistent challenge in healthcare systems. Despite substantial research in this area, clear criteria for prioritizing patients and determining those who can safely wait longer without complications remain elusive. This review aims to develop a rational framework for optimizing surgical queue management in urinary stone treatment by analyzing primary literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review of relevant guidelines, held departmental discussions to identify additional factors, and performed an extensive PubMed search using key terms related to queue management and expectant care in lithiasis.</p><p><strong>Key contents and findings: </strong>Significant factors identified include stone volume and location, presence of hydronephrosis, patient frailty and comorbidities, recurrent urinary infections, nephrostomy or double-J stent, urinary diversion, high occupational risk, limited healthcare access, and refractory pain impacting quality of life. A detailed analysis of these factors is presented in the article.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective management of surgical waitlists for urinary lithiasis requires a comprehensive assessment of factors such as stone characteristics, hydronephrosis, patient frailty, comorbidities, infections, drainage devices, accessibility, and quality of life, as prioritization based solely on waiting time is insufficient and potentially harmful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"181-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:尿路结石手术队列管理是医疗保健系统的一个持续挑战。尽管在这一领域进行了大量研究,但对于优先考虑患者和确定哪些患者可以安全等待更长时间而不会出现并发症的明确标准仍然难以捉摸。本综述旨在通过分析主要文献,建立一个合理的框架来优化泌尿系结石治疗的手术队列管理。方法:我们对相关指南进行了回顾,举行了部门讨论以确定其他因素,并使用与队列管理和结石预期护理相关的关键术语进行了广泛的PubMed搜索。关键内容和发现:确定的重要因素包括结石体积和位置、肾积水的存在、患者虚弱和合并症、复发性尿路感染、肾造口术或双j型支架、尿分流、高职业风险、有限的医疗保健机会和影响生活质量的难治性疼痛。本文对这些因素进行了详细的分析。结论:对尿路结石手术候诊名单的有效管理需要综合评估诸如结石特征、肾积水、患者虚弱、合并症、感染、引流装置、可及性和生活质量等因素,因为仅根据候诊时间进行优先排序是不够的,而且可能有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-sensitive elements in elective treatment of urinary lithiasis: a narrative review.

Background and objective: Managing surgical queues for urinary lithiasis is a persistent challenge in healthcare systems. Despite substantial research in this area, clear criteria for prioritizing patients and determining those who can safely wait longer without complications remain elusive. This review aims to develop a rational framework for optimizing surgical queue management in urinary stone treatment by analyzing primary literature.

Methods: We conducted a review of relevant guidelines, held departmental discussions to identify additional factors, and performed an extensive PubMed search using key terms related to queue management and expectant care in lithiasis.

Key contents and findings: Significant factors identified include stone volume and location, presence of hydronephrosis, patient frailty and comorbidities, recurrent urinary infections, nephrostomy or double-J stent, urinary diversion, high occupational risk, limited healthcare access, and refractory pain impacting quality of life. A detailed analysis of these factors is presented in the article.

Conclusions: Effective management of surgical waitlists for urinary lithiasis requires a comprehensive assessment of factors such as stone characteristics, hydronephrosis, patient frailty, comorbidities, infections, drainage devices, accessibility, and quality of life, as prioritization based solely on waiting time is insufficient and potentially harmful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信