生活满意度变化的回顾认知:评估策略与测量变化的对应关系。

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Annika Z Wei, Brett Q Ford, Emily C Willroth
{"title":"生活满意度变化的回顾认知:评估策略与测量变化的对应关系。","authors":"Annika Z Wei, Brett Q Ford, Emily C Willroth","doi":"10.1177/01461672251319060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Life satisfaction has been shown to change over time, but we know little about how people perceive those changes. In preregistered analyses, the current research investigated the degree of correspondence between people's retrospective perceptions of life satisfaction change and their measured life satisfaction change (Sample A analytic <i>N</i> = 359; Sample B analytic <i>N</i> = 336). On average, retrospective perceptions of change were moderately correlated with measured change (<i>r</i> = .20-.25). When evaluating their life satisfaction change, participants reported that they focused more on the present compared to the past, considered their life circumstances more than their feelings, and engaged in careful consideration more than relying on gut instinct. Findings suggest people have some insight into changes in their life satisfaction. Consistent with the individual differences in evaluating life satisfaction (IDELS) model, people engaged in a variety of evaluation strategies and differed from one another in the degree to which they used each strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1461672251319060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Perceptions of Life Satisfaction Change: Evaluation Strategies and Correspondence With Measured Change.\",\"authors\":\"Annika Z Wei, Brett Q Ford, Emily C Willroth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01461672251319060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Life satisfaction has been shown to change over time, but we know little about how people perceive those changes. In preregistered analyses, the current research investigated the degree of correspondence between people's retrospective perceptions of life satisfaction change and their measured life satisfaction change (Sample A analytic <i>N</i> = 359; Sample B analytic <i>N</i> = 336). On average, retrospective perceptions of change were moderately correlated with measured change (<i>r</i> = .20-.25). When evaluating their life satisfaction change, participants reported that they focused more on the present compared to the past, considered their life circumstances more than their feelings, and engaged in careful consideration more than relying on gut instinct. Findings suggest people have some insight into changes in their life satisfaction. Consistent with the individual differences in evaluating life satisfaction (IDELS) model, people engaged in a variety of evaluation strategies and differed from one another in the degree to which they used each strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1461672251319060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251319060\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251319060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生活满意度随着时间的推移而变化,但我们对人们如何看待这些变化知之甚少。在预注册分析中,本研究调查了人们对生活满意度变化的回顾性感知与他们测量的生活满意度变化之间的对应程度(样本A分析N = 359;样品B分析N = 336)。平均而言,对变化的回顾性感知与测量到的变化有中度相关(r = 0.20 - 0.25)。当评估他们的生活满意度变化时,参与者报告说他们更关注现在而不是过去,更多地考虑他们的生活环境而不是他们的感受,更多地认真考虑而不是依靠直觉。研究结果表明,人们对生活满意度的变化有一定的了解。与评估生活满意度的个体差异(IDELS)模型一致,人们参与各种评估策略,并且在使用每种策略的程度上彼此不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective Perceptions of Life Satisfaction Change: Evaluation Strategies and Correspondence With Measured Change.

Life satisfaction has been shown to change over time, but we know little about how people perceive those changes. In preregistered analyses, the current research investigated the degree of correspondence between people's retrospective perceptions of life satisfaction change and their measured life satisfaction change (Sample A analytic N = 359; Sample B analytic N = 336). On average, retrospective perceptions of change were moderately correlated with measured change (r = .20-.25). When evaluating their life satisfaction change, participants reported that they focused more on the present compared to the past, considered their life circumstances more than their feelings, and engaged in careful consideration more than relying on gut instinct. Findings suggest people have some insight into changes in their life satisfaction. Consistent with the individual differences in evaluating life satisfaction (IDELS) model, people engaged in a variety of evaluation strategies and differed from one another in the degree to which they used each strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信