无性女性与有性女性:一项关于大脑活动差异的复测研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroreport Pub Date : 2025-03-19 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000002147
Hannes Nessling, Laura Mathis, Guilherme Wood, Karl Koschutnig, Jan Willem Koten
{"title":"无性女性与有性女性:一项关于大脑活动差异的复测研究。","authors":"Hannes Nessling, Laura Mathis, Guilherme Wood, Karl Koschutnig, Jan Willem Koten","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asexuality has a prevalence of approximately 1% in the population and should not be confused with hypoactive sexual desire disorder as defined in the DSM-5. Asexuality is characterized by minimal to no sexual attraction to others. The neural correlates of asexuality remain largely unknown, and the test-retest reliability of sexually induced brain activity is still elusive. In this functional MRI study, we used the Asexual Identification Scale to identify 14 asexual women (mean score ~ 46) and 21 sexual women (mean score ~ 14). We modeled brain activity in response to sexual stimuli using the canonical hemodynamic response function and performed voxel-wise test-retest reliability analysis on contrast weight maps. Additionally, we applied pattern recognition methods to distinguish asexual from sexual women. The voxel-wise test-retest reliability of brain activity in response to sexual stimuli was remarkably robust for sexuality relevant brain areas [mean ICC(2,1) = 0.66]. The conjunction analysis comparing sexual stimuli to baseline showed that group brain activity was reproducible at a Bonferroni-corrected P value of 1.78e -6 . The direct contrast between asexual and sexual women yielded no significant differences at the single-voxel level. A support vector machine, however, identified 71% ( P  < 0.03) of asexual and sexual women correctly when test and retest runs were combined. In conclusion, although our sample size is small, our findings suggest that differences between asexual and sexual women may have their neural roots in subtle variations in brain activity across extensive brain regions, which might be identified using classification methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":" ","pages":"272-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asexual versus sexual women: a test-retest study on differences in brain activity.\",\"authors\":\"Hannes Nessling, Laura Mathis, Guilherme Wood, Karl Koschutnig, Jan Willem Koten\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Asexuality has a prevalence of approximately 1% in the population and should not be confused with hypoactive sexual desire disorder as defined in the DSM-5. Asexuality is characterized by minimal to no sexual attraction to others. The neural correlates of asexuality remain largely unknown, and the test-retest reliability of sexually induced brain activity is still elusive. In this functional MRI study, we used the Asexual Identification Scale to identify 14 asexual women (mean score ~ 46) and 21 sexual women (mean score ~ 14). We modeled brain activity in response to sexual stimuli using the canonical hemodynamic response function and performed voxel-wise test-retest reliability analysis on contrast weight maps. Additionally, we applied pattern recognition methods to distinguish asexual from sexual women. The voxel-wise test-retest reliability of brain activity in response to sexual stimuli was remarkably robust for sexuality relevant brain areas [mean ICC(2,1) = 0.66]. The conjunction analysis comparing sexual stimuli to baseline showed that group brain activity was reproducible at a Bonferroni-corrected P value of 1.78e -6 . The direct contrast between asexual and sexual women yielded no significant differences at the single-voxel level. A support vector machine, however, identified 71% ( P  < 0.03) of asexual and sexual women correctly when test and retest runs were combined. In conclusion, although our sample size is small, our findings suggest that differences between asexual and sexual women may have their neural roots in subtle variations in brain activity across extensive brain regions, which might be identified using classification methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroreport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"272-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroreport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无性恋在人群中的患病率约为1%,不应与DSM-5中定义的性欲减退症混淆。无性恋的特点是对他人的性吸引力极小,甚至没有。无性恋的神经关联在很大程度上仍然是未知的,性诱发的大脑活动的反复测试的可靠性仍然是难以捉摸的。在这项功能MRI研究中,我们使用无性恋识别量表对14名无性恋女性(平均得分~ 46)和21名有性恋女性(平均得分~ 14)进行了识别。我们使用典型血流动力学反应函数模拟脑活动对性刺激的反应,并对对比权重图进行体素测试-重测可靠性分析。此外,我们应用模式识别方法来区分无性女性和有性女性。脑活动对性刺激反应的体素测试-重测信度在与性相关的脑区非常稳健(平均ICC(2,1) = 0.66)。将性刺激与基线相比较的联合分析显示,在bonferroni校正的P值为1.78e-6时,组脑活动是可重复的。无性女性和有性女性之间的直接对比在单体素水平上没有显著差异。然而,当测试和重新测试相结合时,支持向量机正确识别了71% (P < 0.03)的无性恋和有性恋女性。总之,尽管我们的样本量很小,但我们的研究结果表明,无性恋女性和有性恋女性之间的差异可能有其神经根源,在广泛的大脑区域中,大脑活动的微妙变化可能通过分类方法来识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asexual versus sexual women: a test-retest study on differences in brain activity.

Asexuality has a prevalence of approximately 1% in the population and should not be confused with hypoactive sexual desire disorder as defined in the DSM-5. Asexuality is characterized by minimal to no sexual attraction to others. The neural correlates of asexuality remain largely unknown, and the test-retest reliability of sexually induced brain activity is still elusive. In this functional MRI study, we used the Asexual Identification Scale to identify 14 asexual women (mean score ~ 46) and 21 sexual women (mean score ~ 14). We modeled brain activity in response to sexual stimuli using the canonical hemodynamic response function and performed voxel-wise test-retest reliability analysis on contrast weight maps. Additionally, we applied pattern recognition methods to distinguish asexual from sexual women. The voxel-wise test-retest reliability of brain activity in response to sexual stimuli was remarkably robust for sexuality relevant brain areas [mean ICC(2,1) = 0.66]. The conjunction analysis comparing sexual stimuli to baseline showed that group brain activity was reproducible at a Bonferroni-corrected P value of 1.78e -6 . The direct contrast between asexual and sexual women yielded no significant differences at the single-voxel level. A support vector machine, however, identified 71% ( P  < 0.03) of asexual and sexual women correctly when test and retest runs were combined. In conclusion, although our sample size is small, our findings suggest that differences between asexual and sexual women may have their neural roots in subtle variations in brain activity across extensive brain regions, which might be identified using classification methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroreport
Neuroreport 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works. We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信