骨骼肌减少症作为颈椎手术不良功能预后的预测因子:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anish Tayal, Satyam Wahi, Aiman Perween Afsar, Bhavya Pahwa, Kanwaljeet Garg
{"title":"骨骼肌减少症作为颈椎手术不良功能预后的预测因子:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Anish Tayal, Satyam Wahi, Aiman Perween Afsar, Bhavya Pahwa, Kanwaljeet Garg","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03398-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sarcopenia is a progressive loss of muscle mass. This study aims to determine the association of pre-operative sarcopenia with the outcome of cervical spine surgery. Pubmed, Ovid, Embase, and Web of Sciences databases were searched until September 2023 to include articles regarding the prognostic role of preoperative sarcopenia in cervical spine surgery patients. The Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The vote-counting model was used for the qualitative appraisal of the studies. Statistical analysis was performed with a significant p < 0.05 using SPSS software (version 23). Of the 1,134 articles revealed from the search, 15 studies with 1463 patients were included. A significant difference between patients with and without sarcopenia was not found for the occurrence of loss of lordosis (OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 0.21 to 7.62, p = 0.6137), and deterioration of the Neck disability index postoperatively (OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 0.0 to 632.04, p = 0.7914). In the vote-counting model, there was strong evidence that sarcopenia worsens postoperative patient-reported outcomes and spine stability, while evidence was conflicting on whether sarcopenia can affect the occurrence of surgical complications. Sarcopenia may predispose cervical spine surgery patients to a worse surgical outcome as compared to non-sarcopenic patients, and it can be used to prognosticate the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sarcopenia as a predictor of poor functional outcome of cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anish Tayal, Satyam Wahi, Aiman Perween Afsar, Bhavya Pahwa, Kanwaljeet Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03398-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sarcopenia is a progressive loss of muscle mass. This study aims to determine the association of pre-operative sarcopenia with the outcome of cervical spine surgery. Pubmed, Ovid, Embase, and Web of Sciences databases were searched until September 2023 to include articles regarding the prognostic role of preoperative sarcopenia in cervical spine surgery patients. The Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The vote-counting model was used for the qualitative appraisal of the studies. Statistical analysis was performed with a significant p < 0.05 using SPSS software (version 23). Of the 1,134 articles revealed from the search, 15 studies with 1463 patients were included. A significant difference between patients with and without sarcopenia was not found for the occurrence of loss of lordosis (OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 0.21 to 7.62, p = 0.6137), and deterioration of the Neck disability index postoperatively (OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 0.0 to 632.04, p = 0.7914). In the vote-counting model, there was strong evidence that sarcopenia worsens postoperative patient-reported outcomes and spine stability, while evidence was conflicting on whether sarcopenia can affect the occurrence of surgical complications. Sarcopenia may predispose cervical spine surgery patients to a worse surgical outcome as compared to non-sarcopenic patients, and it can be used to prognosticate the patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03398-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03398-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌肉减少症是一种肌肉质量的进行性损失。本研究旨在确定术前肌肉减少症与颈椎手术结果的关系。检索Pubmed, Ovid, Embase和Web of Sciences数据库,直到2023年9月,包括关于颈椎手术患者术前肌肉减少症预后作用的文章。预后质量研究(QUIPS)工具用于评估偏倚风险。遵循流行病学观察性研究(MOOSE)的荟萃分析和系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。采用点票模型对研究进行定性评价。进行统计学分析,p值显著
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sarcopenia as a predictor of poor functional outcome of cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarcopenia is a progressive loss of muscle mass. This study aims to determine the association of pre-operative sarcopenia with the outcome of cervical spine surgery. Pubmed, Ovid, Embase, and Web of Sciences databases were searched until September 2023 to include articles regarding the prognostic role of preoperative sarcopenia in cervical spine surgery patients. The Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The vote-counting model was used for the qualitative appraisal of the studies. Statistical analysis was performed with a significant p < 0.05 using SPSS software (version 23). Of the 1,134 articles revealed from the search, 15 studies with 1463 patients were included. A significant difference between patients with and without sarcopenia was not found for the occurrence of loss of lordosis (OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 0.21 to 7.62, p = 0.6137), and deterioration of the Neck disability index postoperatively (OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 0.0 to 632.04, p = 0.7914). In the vote-counting model, there was strong evidence that sarcopenia worsens postoperative patient-reported outcomes and spine stability, while evidence was conflicting on whether sarcopenia can affect the occurrence of surgical complications. Sarcopenia may predispose cervical spine surgery patients to a worse surgical outcome as compared to non-sarcopenic patients, and it can be used to prognosticate the patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信