早期妇科肿瘤学家子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌前哨淋巴结定位培训和实践的全球调查。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Irina Tsibulak, Anna Collins, Heng-Cheng Hsu, Enrique Chacon, Nicolò Bizzarri, Alex Mutombo Baleka, Zoia Razumova, Charalampos Theofanakis, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Alexandra Natalia Strojna, Andrei Pletnev, Martina Aida Angeles, Alexander Shushkevich, Tanja Nikolova, Tibor A Zwimpfer, Houssein El Hajj, Faiza Gaba, Maximillian Lanner, Esra Bilir, Richárd Tóth, Andrej Cokan, Jaime Garcia, Michael Frumovitz, Pedro T Ramirez
{"title":"早期妇科肿瘤学家子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌前哨淋巴结定位培训和实践的全球调查。","authors":"Irina Tsibulak, Anna Collins, Heng-Cheng Hsu, Enrique Chacon, Nicolò Bizzarri, Alex Mutombo Baleka, Zoia Razumova, Charalampos Theofanakis, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Alexandra Natalia Strojna, Andrei Pletnev, Martina Aida Angeles, Alexander Shushkevich, Tanja Nikolova, Tibor A Zwimpfer, Houssein El Hajj, Faiza Gaba, Maximillian Lanner, Esra Bilir, Richárd Tóth, Andrej Cokan, Jaime Garcia, Michael Frumovitz, Pedro T Ramirez","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This survey was designed to evaluate exposure to sentinel mapping for cervical and endometrial cancers in addition to the quality and availability of surgical training in sentinel procedures around the world. Furthermore, we aimed to identify obstacles in surgical training in the sentinel procedure to support the adoption of this technique in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 52-item survey was developed and computed using Qualtrics XM and SurveyMonkey software. The target population were members of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecological Cancer Society aged ≤40 years. The study invitation was disseminated within both organizations' database. The survey hyperlink was active between September and December 2022. Respondents using the same Internet Protocol address were excluded to avoid duplication of responses. Responses to <50% questions were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 238 respondents joined the survey, and 182 (76.5%) provided answers that met the inclusion criteria. Sentinel mapping was implemented for a longer period and used more frequently in endometrial than in cervical carcinoma; 55% of the responders were initially trained in systematic lymph node dissection, and 22% were not yet trained in any lymph node staging. The main challenges in applying sentinel procedure for early-career gynecologic oncologists were no access to hands-on training (n = 22, 12.1%) and no clinical routine in performing systematic pelvic (n = 15, 8.2%) and para-aortic (n = 35, 19.2%) lymph node dissection in case of failed mapping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is integrated in cervical and endometrial cancer guidelines, a significant number of institutions do not implement this procedure in clinical routine, and 22% of early-career gynecologic oncologists are not trained in any type of surgical lymph node staging. Support for sentinel mapping in national guidelines and guided training opportunities are needed to apply this method globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"100050"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global survey on training and practice in sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial and cervical cancer among early-career gynecologic oncologists.\",\"authors\":\"Irina Tsibulak, Anna Collins, Heng-Cheng Hsu, Enrique Chacon, Nicolò Bizzarri, Alex Mutombo Baleka, Zoia Razumova, Charalampos Theofanakis, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Alexandra Natalia Strojna, Andrei Pletnev, Martina Aida Angeles, Alexander Shushkevich, Tanja Nikolova, Tibor A Zwimpfer, Houssein El Hajj, Faiza Gaba, Maximillian Lanner, Esra Bilir, Richárd Tóth, Andrej Cokan, Jaime Garcia, Michael Frumovitz, Pedro T Ramirez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This survey was designed to evaluate exposure to sentinel mapping for cervical and endometrial cancers in addition to the quality and availability of surgical training in sentinel procedures around the world. Furthermore, we aimed to identify obstacles in surgical training in the sentinel procedure to support the adoption of this technique in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 52-item survey was developed and computed using Qualtrics XM and SurveyMonkey software. The target population were members of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecological Cancer Society aged ≤40 years. The study invitation was disseminated within both organizations' database. The survey hyperlink was active between September and December 2022. Respondents using the same Internet Protocol address were excluded to avoid duplication of responses. Responses to <50% questions were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 238 respondents joined the survey, and 182 (76.5%) provided answers that met the inclusion criteria. Sentinel mapping was implemented for a longer period and used more frequently in endometrial than in cervical carcinoma; 55% of the responders were initially trained in systematic lymph node dissection, and 22% were not yet trained in any lymph node staging. The main challenges in applying sentinel procedure for early-career gynecologic oncologists were no access to hands-on training (n = 22, 12.1%) and no clinical routine in performing systematic pelvic (n = 15, 8.2%) and para-aortic (n = 35, 19.2%) lymph node dissection in case of failed mapping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is integrated in cervical and endometrial cancer guidelines, a significant number of institutions do not implement this procedure in clinical routine, and 22% of early-career gynecologic oncologists are not trained in any type of surgical lymph node staging. Support for sentinel mapping in national guidelines and guided training opportunities are needed to apply this method globally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"100050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本调查旨在评估宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌哨点定位暴露以及世界各地哨点手术培训的质量和可用性。此外,我们的目的是确定在前哨手术的外科培训障碍,以支持该技术在临床实践中的采用。方法:采用qualics XM软件和SurveyMonkey软件编制并计算52项调查问卷。目标人群是年龄≤40岁的欧洲妇科肿瘤学会和国际妇科癌症学会的成员。研究邀请在两个组织的数据基内散发。该调查超链接在2022年9月至12月期间活跃。使用相同互联网协议地址的受访者被排除在外,以避免重复回答。对结果的回应:总共有238人参加了调查,其中182人(76.5%)提供了符合纳入标准的答案。哨点定位的实施时间较长,在子宫内膜中比在宫颈癌中更常用;55%的应答者最初接受过系统性淋巴结清扫的培训,22%的应答者尚未接受过任何淋巴结分期的培训。早期妇科肿瘤学家应用前哨手术的主要挑战是无法获得实践培训(n = 22, 12.1%),以及在定位失败的情况下,没有进行系统盆腔(n = 15, 8.2%)和主动脉旁淋巴结清扫(n = 35, 19.2%)的临床常规。结论:尽管前哨淋巴结活检被纳入子宫癌和子宫内膜癌指南,但相当多的机构并没有在临床常规中实施这一程序,22%的早期妇科肿瘤学家没有接受过任何类型的手术淋巴结分期培训。需要在国家指南和指导培训机会中支持哨点测绘,以便在全球应用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global survey on training and practice in sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial and cervical cancer among early-career gynecologic oncologists.

Objective: This survey was designed to evaluate exposure to sentinel mapping for cervical and endometrial cancers in addition to the quality and availability of surgical training in sentinel procedures around the world. Furthermore, we aimed to identify obstacles in surgical training in the sentinel procedure to support the adoption of this technique in clinical practice.

Methods: A 52-item survey was developed and computed using Qualtrics XM and SurveyMonkey software. The target population were members of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecological Cancer Society aged ≤40 years. The study invitation was disseminated within both organizations' database. The survey hyperlink was active between September and December 2022. Respondents using the same Internet Protocol address were excluded to avoid duplication of responses. Responses to <50% questions were excluded.

Results: Overall, 238 respondents joined the survey, and 182 (76.5%) provided answers that met the inclusion criteria. Sentinel mapping was implemented for a longer period and used more frequently in endometrial than in cervical carcinoma; 55% of the responders were initially trained in systematic lymph node dissection, and 22% were not yet trained in any lymph node staging. The main challenges in applying sentinel procedure for early-career gynecologic oncologists were no access to hands-on training (n = 22, 12.1%) and no clinical routine in performing systematic pelvic (n = 15, 8.2%) and para-aortic (n = 35, 19.2%) lymph node dissection in case of failed mapping.

Conclusions: Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is integrated in cervical and endometrial cancer guidelines, a significant number of institutions do not implement this procedure in clinical routine, and 22% of early-career gynecologic oncologists are not trained in any type of surgical lymph node staging. Support for sentinel mapping in national guidelines and guided training opportunities are needed to apply this method globally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信