品种组成在杂交猪参考群体基因组预测中的作用。

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Animal Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.5187/jast.2025.e2
Euiseo Hong, Yoonji Chung, Phuong Thanh N Dinh, Yoonsik Kim, Suyeon Maeng, Young Jae Choi, Jaeho Lee, Woonyoung Jeong, Hyunji Choi, Seung Hwan Lee
{"title":"品种组成在杂交猪参考群体基因组预测中的作用。","authors":"Euiseo Hong, Yoonji Chung, Phuong Thanh N Dinh, Yoonsik Kim, Suyeon Maeng, Young Jae Choi, Jaeho Lee, Woonyoung Jeong, Hyunji Choi, Seung Hwan Lee","doi":"10.5187/jast.2025.e2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to conventional genomic prediction, which typically targets a single breed and circumvents the necessity for population structure adjustments, multi-breed genomic prediction necessitates accounting for population structure to mitigate potential bias. The presence of this structure in multi-breed datasets can influence prediction accuracy, rendering proper modeling crucial for achieving unbiased results. This study aimed to address the effect of population structure on multi-breed genomic prediction, particularly focusing on crossbred reference populations. The prediction accuracy of genomic models was assessed by incorporating genomic breed composition (GBC) or principal component analysis (PCA) into the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. The accuracy of five different genomic prediction models was evaluated using data from 354 Duroc × Korean native pig crossbreds, 1,105 Landrace × Korean native pig crossbreds, and 1,107 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc crossbreds. The models tested were GBLUP without population structure adjustment, GBLUP with PCA as a fixed effect, GBLUP with GBC as a fixed effect, GBLUP with PCA as a random effect, and GBLUP with GBC as a random effect. The highest prediction accuracies for backfat thickness (0.59) and carcass weight (0.50) were observed in Models 1, 4, and 5. In contrast, Models 2 and 3, which included population structure as a fixed effect, exhibited lower accuracies, with backfat thickness accuracies of 0.40 and 0.53 and carcass weight accuracies of 0.34 and 0.38, respectively. These findings suggest that in multi-breed genomic prediction, the most efficient and accurate approach is either to forgo adjusting for population structure or, if adjustments are necessary, to model it as a random effect. This study provides a robust framework for multi-breed genomic prediction, highlighting the critical role of appropriately accounting for population structure. Moreover, our findings have important implications for improving genomic selection efficiency, ultimately enhancing commercial production by optimizing prediction accuracy in crossbred populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","volume":"67 1","pages":"56-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of breed composition in genomic prediction using crossbred pig reference population.\",\"authors\":\"Euiseo Hong, Yoonji Chung, Phuong Thanh N Dinh, Yoonsik Kim, Suyeon Maeng, Young Jae Choi, Jaeho Lee, Woonyoung Jeong, Hyunji Choi, Seung Hwan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5187/jast.2025.e2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In contrast to conventional genomic prediction, which typically targets a single breed and circumvents the necessity for population structure adjustments, multi-breed genomic prediction necessitates accounting for population structure to mitigate potential bias. The presence of this structure in multi-breed datasets can influence prediction accuracy, rendering proper modeling crucial for achieving unbiased results. This study aimed to address the effect of population structure on multi-breed genomic prediction, particularly focusing on crossbred reference populations. The prediction accuracy of genomic models was assessed by incorporating genomic breed composition (GBC) or principal component analysis (PCA) into the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. The accuracy of five different genomic prediction models was evaluated using data from 354 Duroc × Korean native pig crossbreds, 1,105 Landrace × Korean native pig crossbreds, and 1,107 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc crossbreds. The models tested were GBLUP without population structure adjustment, GBLUP with PCA as a fixed effect, GBLUP with GBC as a fixed effect, GBLUP with PCA as a random effect, and GBLUP with GBC as a random effect. The highest prediction accuracies for backfat thickness (0.59) and carcass weight (0.50) were observed in Models 1, 4, and 5. In contrast, Models 2 and 3, which included population structure as a fixed effect, exhibited lower accuracies, with backfat thickness accuracies of 0.40 and 0.53 and carcass weight accuracies of 0.34 and 0.38, respectively. These findings suggest that in multi-breed genomic prediction, the most efficient and accurate approach is either to forgo adjusting for population structure or, if adjustments are necessary, to model it as a random effect. This study provides a robust framework for multi-breed genomic prediction, highlighting the critical role of appropriately accounting for population structure. Moreover, our findings have important implications for improving genomic selection efficiency, ultimately enhancing commercial production by optimizing prediction accuracy in crossbred populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"56-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833194/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2025.e2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2025.e2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的基因组预测通常针对单一品种,避免了群体结构调整的必要性,与之相反,多品种基因组预测需要考虑群体结构以减轻潜在的偏差。这种结构在多品种数据集中的存在会影响预测精度,因此正确的建模对于获得无偏结果至关重要。本研究旨在探讨群体结构对多品种基因组预测的影响,特别是对杂交参考群体的影响。通过将基因组品种组成(GBC)或主成分分析(PCA)纳入基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)模型,对基因组模型的预测精度进行了评估。利用354个杜洛克×韩国本土猪杂交品种、1105个长白×韩国本土猪杂交品种和1107个长白×约克郡×杜洛克杂交品种的数据,对5种不同基因组预测模型的准确性进行了评估。检验的模型分别为不进行人口结构调整的GBLUP、PCA固定效应的GBLUP、GBC固定效应的GBLUP、PCA随机效应的GBLUP、GBC随机效应的GBLUP。模型1、模型4和模型5对背膘厚度(0.59)和胴体重(0.50)的预测精度最高。考虑种群结构影响的模型2和模型3精度较低,背膘厚度精度分别为0.40和0.53,胴体质量精度分别为0.34和0.38。这些发现表明,在多品种基因组预测中,最有效和最准确的方法要么放弃对种群结构的调整,要么在必要时将其建模为随机效应。该研究为多品种基因组预测提供了一个强有力的框架,突出了适当考虑种群结构的关键作用。此外,我们的研究结果对于提高基因组选择效率,最终通过优化杂交群体的预测准确性来提高商业化生产具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of breed composition in genomic prediction using crossbred pig reference population.

In contrast to conventional genomic prediction, which typically targets a single breed and circumvents the necessity for population structure adjustments, multi-breed genomic prediction necessitates accounting for population structure to mitigate potential bias. The presence of this structure in multi-breed datasets can influence prediction accuracy, rendering proper modeling crucial for achieving unbiased results. This study aimed to address the effect of population structure on multi-breed genomic prediction, particularly focusing on crossbred reference populations. The prediction accuracy of genomic models was assessed by incorporating genomic breed composition (GBC) or principal component analysis (PCA) into the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. The accuracy of five different genomic prediction models was evaluated using data from 354 Duroc × Korean native pig crossbreds, 1,105 Landrace × Korean native pig crossbreds, and 1,107 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc crossbreds. The models tested were GBLUP without population structure adjustment, GBLUP with PCA as a fixed effect, GBLUP with GBC as a fixed effect, GBLUP with PCA as a random effect, and GBLUP with GBC as a random effect. The highest prediction accuracies for backfat thickness (0.59) and carcass weight (0.50) were observed in Models 1, 4, and 5. In contrast, Models 2 and 3, which included population structure as a fixed effect, exhibited lower accuracies, with backfat thickness accuracies of 0.40 and 0.53 and carcass weight accuracies of 0.34 and 0.38, respectively. These findings suggest that in multi-breed genomic prediction, the most efficient and accurate approach is either to forgo adjusting for population structure or, if adjustments are necessary, to model it as a random effect. This study provides a robust framework for multi-breed genomic prediction, highlighting the critical role of appropriately accounting for population structure. Moreover, our findings have important implications for improving genomic selection efficiency, ultimately enhancing commercial production by optimizing prediction accuracy in crossbred populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Journal of Animal Science and Technology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Sci. Technol. or JAST) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, review articles and notes in all fields of animal science. Topics covered by the journal include: genetics and breeding, physiology, nutrition of monogastric animals, nutrition of ruminants, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, grasslands and roughages, livestock environment, animal biotechnology, animal behavior and welfare. Articles generally report research involving beef cattle, dairy cattle, pigs, companion animals, goats, horses, and sheep. However, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will also be considered for publication. The Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Technol. or JAST) has been the official journal of The Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) since 2000, formerly known as The Korean Journal of Animal Sciences (launched in 1956).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信