{"title":"巴勒斯坦加沙地带蓝色和绿色农业用水足迹评估。","authors":"Amjad Mizyed, Yunes Mogheir, Mazen Hamada","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The water system in the Gaza Strip is deteriorating as the agricultural sector consumes more than 50% of the available water. There is an urgent need for effective tools that rationalize agricultural water consumption. The concept of the blue and green water footprint (WF) was applied to determine the actual water consumption of all crops in the Gaza Strip and evaluate the sustainability of the agricultural water footprint. The CROPWAT 8.0 model was used to calculate the crop water requirements (CWR) and estimate evapotranspiration (ET) according to the Hoekstra manual. The results show that the blue water footprint of crops was 82.15 mm3 distributed among 59.4 mm3 of horticulture trees, 3.65 mm3 of field crops, and 19.2 mm3 of vegetables whereas the green water footprint was 33.82 mm3. The main insight is that the water footprint's sustainability reflects a serious indicator of the depletion of blue water in the Gaza Strip and if WF is applied, 40 mm3 of water can be saved annually, which constitutes 33% less than the current usage. It is promising to use the water footprint concept as a distinct tool in supporting the decision-maker to reduce water consumption and enhance water resource sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":"21 2","pages":"326-334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of blue and green agricultural water footprint in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.\",\"authors\":\"Amjad Mizyed, Yunes Mogheir, Mazen Hamada\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/inteam/vjae010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The water system in the Gaza Strip is deteriorating as the agricultural sector consumes more than 50% of the available water. There is an urgent need for effective tools that rationalize agricultural water consumption. The concept of the blue and green water footprint (WF) was applied to determine the actual water consumption of all crops in the Gaza Strip and evaluate the sustainability of the agricultural water footprint. The CROPWAT 8.0 model was used to calculate the crop water requirements (CWR) and estimate evapotranspiration (ET) according to the Hoekstra manual. The results show that the blue water footprint of crops was 82.15 mm3 distributed among 59.4 mm3 of horticulture trees, 3.65 mm3 of field crops, and 19.2 mm3 of vegetables whereas the green water footprint was 33.82 mm3. The main insight is that the water footprint's sustainability reflects a serious indicator of the depletion of blue water in the Gaza Strip and if WF is applied, 40 mm3 of water can be saved annually, which constitutes 33% less than the current usage. It is promising to use the water footprint concept as a distinct tool in supporting the decision-maker to reduce water consumption and enhance water resource sustainability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"326-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjae010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjae010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of blue and green agricultural water footprint in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.
The water system in the Gaza Strip is deteriorating as the agricultural sector consumes more than 50% of the available water. There is an urgent need for effective tools that rationalize agricultural water consumption. The concept of the blue and green water footprint (WF) was applied to determine the actual water consumption of all crops in the Gaza Strip and evaluate the sustainability of the agricultural water footprint. The CROPWAT 8.0 model was used to calculate the crop water requirements (CWR) and estimate evapotranspiration (ET) according to the Hoekstra manual. The results show that the blue water footprint of crops was 82.15 mm3 distributed among 59.4 mm3 of horticulture trees, 3.65 mm3 of field crops, and 19.2 mm3 of vegetables whereas the green water footprint was 33.82 mm3. The main insight is that the water footprint's sustainability reflects a serious indicator of the depletion of blue water in the Gaza Strip and if WF is applied, 40 mm3 of water can be saved annually, which constitutes 33% less than the current usage. It is promising to use the water footprint concept as a distinct tool in supporting the decision-maker to reduce water consumption and enhance water resource sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.