开发和验证同时筛查老年人营养不良、肌肉减少症和恶病质的新工具。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Haroun, Mona Hegazy Mohamed, Marwa Abd El Azeem Abd EL Gawad, Doha Rasheedy
{"title":"开发和验证同时筛查老年人营养不良、肌肉减少症和恶病质的新工具。","authors":"Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Haroun,&nbsp;Mona Hegazy Mohamed,&nbsp;Marwa Abd El Azeem Abd EL Gawad,&nbsp;Doha Rasheedy","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The high prevalence of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia among older adults presents a significant health care challenge, underscoring the need for effective screening tools. Given the frequent overlap of these conditions, a tool capable of simultaneously screening for all three conditions is imperative.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The development process included an extensive review of existing assessment instruments and data on risk factors, clinical presentations, and consequences of the three conditions. The tool underwent rigorous testing to evaluate its reliability and validity in a sample of 300 older adults. It was compared against standard diagnostic criteria and assessed alongside other screening tools, including the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen percent (<i>n</i> = 54) of participants were diagnosed with an overlap of the three conditions, 10% (<i>n</i> = 30) of cases presented with sarcopenia alone and 3% (<i>n</i> = 10) were diagnosed with malnutrition only. The new tool demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.818 and high construct validity. The newly developed tool and Mini Nutritional Assessment–Short Form had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting the malnutrition and sarcopenia. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting cachexia, whereas the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia exhibited the lowest diagnostic accuracy across all conditions. The retention criteria for items were deemed valid for the 19 items included in the finalized version of the new tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Screening for malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults using a single tool was feasible. The new tool was easy to use and did not require anthropometric measurements or physical performance tasks. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 511–519</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"25 4","pages":"511-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a new tool for simultaneous screening of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Haroun,&nbsp;Mona Hegazy Mohamed,&nbsp;Marwa Abd El Azeem Abd EL Gawad,&nbsp;Doha Rasheedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The high prevalence of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia among older adults presents a significant health care challenge, underscoring the need for effective screening tools. Given the frequent overlap of these conditions, a tool capable of simultaneously screening for all three conditions is imperative.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The development process included an extensive review of existing assessment instruments and data on risk factors, clinical presentations, and consequences of the three conditions. The tool underwent rigorous testing to evaluate its reliability and validity in a sample of 300 older adults. It was compared against standard diagnostic criteria and assessed alongside other screening tools, including the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighteen percent (<i>n</i> = 54) of participants were diagnosed with an overlap of the three conditions, 10% (<i>n</i> = 30) of cases presented with sarcopenia alone and 3% (<i>n</i> = 10) were diagnosed with malnutrition only. The new tool demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.818 and high construct validity. The newly developed tool and Mini Nutritional Assessment–Short Form had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting the malnutrition and sarcopenia. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting cachexia, whereas the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia exhibited the lowest diagnostic accuracy across all conditions. The retention criteria for items were deemed valid for the 19 items included in the finalized version of the new tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Screening for malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults using a single tool was feasible. The new tool was easy to use and did not require anthropometric measurements or physical performance tasks. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 511–519</b>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"511-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.70010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人营养不良、肌肉减少症和恶病质的高发对医疗保健提出了重大挑战,强调需要有效的筛查工具。鉴于这些情况经常重叠,一种能够同时筛查所有三种情况的工具是必不可少的。方法:开发过程包括对现有评估工具和风险因素、临床表现和三种疾病后果的数据进行广泛审查。该工具经过了严格的测试,以评估其在300名老年人样本中的可靠性和有效性。将其与标准诊断标准进行比较,并与其他筛选工具一起进行评估,包括迷你营养评估-简短表格,简短营养评估问卷和快速诊断肌肉减少症的简单问卷。结果:18% (n = 54)的参与者被诊断为三种情况的重叠,10% (n = 30)的病例仅表现为肌肉减少症,3% (n = 10)被诊断为营养不良。新工具的Cronbach’s alpha值为0.818,具有较高的结构效度。新开发的工具和迷你营养评估简表在预测营养不良和肌肉减少症方面具有最高的诊断准确性。短营养评估问卷在预测恶病质方面具有最高的诊断准确性,而快速诊断肌肉减少症的简单问卷在所有条件下的诊断准确性最低。项目保留标准被认为对新工具最终版本中包含的19个项目有效。结论:使用单一工具筛查老年人营养不良、肌肉减少症和恶病质是可行的。新工具易于使用,不需要人体测量或物理性能任务。Geriatr Gerontol 2025;••: ••-••.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and validation of a new tool for simultaneous screening of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults

Development and validation of a new tool for simultaneous screening of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults

Introduction

The high prevalence of malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia among older adults presents a significant health care challenge, underscoring the need for effective screening tools. Given the frequent overlap of these conditions, a tool capable of simultaneously screening for all three conditions is imperative.

Methods

The development process included an extensive review of existing assessment instruments and data on risk factors, clinical presentations, and consequences of the three conditions. The tool underwent rigorous testing to evaluate its reliability and validity in a sample of 300 older adults. It was compared against standard diagnostic criteria and assessed alongside other screening tools, including the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia.

Results

Eighteen percent (n = 54) of participants were diagnosed with an overlap of the three conditions, 10% (n = 30) of cases presented with sarcopenia alone and 3% (n = 10) were diagnosed with malnutrition only. The new tool demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.818 and high construct validity. The newly developed tool and Mini Nutritional Assessment–Short Form had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting the malnutrition and sarcopenia. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting cachexia, whereas the Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia exhibited the lowest diagnostic accuracy across all conditions. The retention criteria for items were deemed valid for the 19 items included in the finalized version of the new tool.

Conclusions

Screening for malnutrition, sarcopenia and cachexia in older adults using a single tool was feasible. The new tool was easy to use and did not require anthropometric measurements or physical performance tasks. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 511–519.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信