产后2周和6个月超重和肥胖妇女身体成分的生物阻抗分析的相对有效性。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food & Nutrition Research Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.29219/fnr.v69.10869
Elin Westerheim, Elisabeth A Øhman, Maria Fossli, Anna Winkvist, Hege Berg Henriksen, Hilde K Brekke
{"title":"产后2周和6个月超重和肥胖妇女身体成分的生物阻抗分析的相对有效性。","authors":"Elin Westerheim, Elisabeth A Øhman, Maria Fossli, Anna Winkvist, Hege Berg Henriksen, Hilde K Brekke","doi":"10.29219/fnr.v69.10869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relative validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in estimating fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference method in women with overweight and obesity 2 weeks and 6 months postpartum (pp).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Body composition of 94 women with overweight and obesity was assessed using Seca mBCA 515 and GE Healthcare Lunar iDXA. Agreement between the two methods for FM and FFM at 2 weeks and 6 months pp, as well as the changes in FM and FFM between the two timepoints, were tested using paired <i>t</i>-test, Bland-Altman plots and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index (BMI) at 2 weeks pp was 30.6 (2.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup> and mean (SD) weight loss at 6 months pp was 4.7 (4.8) kg. BIA underestimated FM at both 2 weeks pp and 6 months pp by mean (SD) 0.7 (1.4) kg and 0.3 (1.3) kg and overestimated FFM at both timepoints by 1.2 (1.5) kg and 0.7 (1.4) kg, with proportional bias for FFM. BIA underestimated <i>changes</i> in FM by mean (SD) 0.5 (1.1) kg and overestimated <i>changes</i> in FFM by 0.5 (1.0) kg, with proportional bias for change in extracellular water by total body water. Agreement was generally high for both cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At group level, BIA was a valid tool for assessment of FM and FFM in women with overweight and obesity at 2 weeks and 6 months pp when compared to DXA. We also consider it valid for following changes in FM and FFM over time when fluid distribution is stable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12119,"journal":{"name":"Food & Nutrition Research","volume":"69 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis in estimating body composition in women with overweight and obesity 2 weeks and 6 months postpartum.\",\"authors\":\"Elin Westerheim, Elisabeth A Øhman, Maria Fossli, Anna Winkvist, Hege Berg Henriksen, Hilde K Brekke\",\"doi\":\"10.29219/fnr.v69.10869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relative validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in estimating fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference method in women with overweight and obesity 2 weeks and 6 months postpartum (pp).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Body composition of 94 women with overweight and obesity was assessed using Seca mBCA 515 and GE Healthcare Lunar iDXA. Agreement between the two methods for FM and FFM at 2 weeks and 6 months pp, as well as the changes in FM and FFM between the two timepoints, were tested using paired <i>t</i>-test, Bland-Altman plots and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index (BMI) at 2 weeks pp was 30.6 (2.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup> and mean (SD) weight loss at 6 months pp was 4.7 (4.8) kg. BIA underestimated FM at both 2 weeks pp and 6 months pp by mean (SD) 0.7 (1.4) kg and 0.3 (1.3) kg and overestimated FFM at both timepoints by 1.2 (1.5) kg and 0.7 (1.4) kg, with proportional bias for FFM. BIA underestimated <i>changes</i> in FM by mean (SD) 0.5 (1.1) kg and overestimated <i>changes</i> in FFM by 0.5 (1.0) kg, with proportional bias for change in extracellular water by total body water. Agreement was generally high for both cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At group level, BIA was a valid tool for assessment of FM and FFM in women with overweight and obesity at 2 weeks and 6 months pp when compared to DXA. We also consider it valid for following changes in FM and FFM over time when fluid distribution is stable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food & Nutrition Research\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food & Nutrition Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v69.10869\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v69.10869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨生物电阻抗分析(BIA)作为参考方法在产后2周和6个月超重和肥胖妇女(pp)脂肪质量(FM)和无脂质量(FFM)评估中的相对有效性。方法:采用Seca mBCA 515和GE Healthcare Lunar iDXA对94名超重和肥胖女性的体成分进行评估。采用配对t检验、Bland-Altman图和回归分析检验两种方法在2周和6个月时FM和FFM的一致性,以及两个时间点之间FM和FFM的变化。结果:平均(标准差[SD])体重指数(BMI)在pp 2周时为30.6 (2.6)kg/m2,平均(SD)体重减轻在pp 6个月时为4.7 (4.8)kg。BIA在每隔2周和每隔6个月低估了FM平均(SD) 0.7 (1.4) kg和0.3 (1.3)kg,并在两个时间点高估了FFM 1.2 (1.5) kg和0.7 (1.4)kg,对FFM有比例偏差。BIA低估了FM的变化平均(SD) 0.5 (1.1) kg,高估了FFM的变化0.5 (1.0)kg,细胞外水的变化与全身水的变化呈比例偏差。在横断面和纵向比较中,一致性普遍较高。结论:在组水平上,与DXA相比,BIA是评估超重和肥胖女性在pp 2周和6个月时FM和FFM的有效工具。当流体分布稳定时,我们也认为它适用于跟踪FM和FFM随时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis in estimating body composition in women with overweight and obesity 2 weeks and 6 months postpartum.

Objective: To investigate the relative validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in estimating fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference method in women with overweight and obesity 2 weeks and 6 months postpartum (pp).

Methods: Body composition of 94 women with overweight and obesity was assessed using Seca mBCA 515 and GE Healthcare Lunar iDXA. Agreement between the two methods for FM and FFM at 2 weeks and 6 months pp, as well as the changes in FM and FFM between the two timepoints, were tested using paired t-test, Bland-Altman plots and regression analyses.

Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) body mass index (BMI) at 2 weeks pp was 30.6 (2.6) kg/m2 and mean (SD) weight loss at 6 months pp was 4.7 (4.8) kg. BIA underestimated FM at both 2 weeks pp and 6 months pp by mean (SD) 0.7 (1.4) kg and 0.3 (1.3) kg and overestimated FFM at both timepoints by 1.2 (1.5) kg and 0.7 (1.4) kg, with proportional bias for FFM. BIA underestimated changes in FM by mean (SD) 0.5 (1.1) kg and overestimated changes in FFM by 0.5 (1.0) kg, with proportional bias for change in extracellular water by total body water. Agreement was generally high for both cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons.

Conclusions: At group level, BIA was a valid tool for assessment of FM and FFM in women with overweight and obesity at 2 weeks and 6 months pp when compared to DXA. We also consider it valid for following changes in FM and FFM over time when fluid distribution is stable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food & Nutrition Research
Food & Nutrition Research FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Food & Nutrition Research is a peer-reviewed journal that presents the latest scientific research in various fields focusing on human nutrition. The journal publishes both quantitative and qualitative research papers. Through an Open Access publishing model, Food & Nutrition Research opens an important forum for researchers from academic and private arenas to exchange the latest results from research on human nutrition in a broad sense, both original papers and reviews, including: * Associations and effects of foods and nutrients on health * Dietary patterns and health * Molecular nutrition * Health claims on foods * Nutrition and cognitive functions * Nutritional effects of food composition and processing * Nutrition in developing countries * Animal and in vitro models with clear relevance for human nutrition * Nutrition and the Environment * Food and Nutrition Education * Nutrition and Economics Research papers on food chemistry (focus on chemical composition and analysis of foods) are generally not considered eligible, unless the results have a clear impact on human nutrition. The journal focuses on the different aspects of nutrition for people involved in nutrition research such as Dentists, Dieticians, Medical doctors, Nutritionists, Teachers, Journalists and Manufacturers in the food and pharmaceutical industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信