Yuhao Zou, Dongfeng Li, Virgili Gianni, Nathan Congdon, Prabhath Piyasena, S Grace Prakalapakorn, Ruifan Zhang, Zixiang Zhao, Ving Fai Chan, Man Yu
{"title":"儿童干眼病患病率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuhao Zou, Dongfeng Li, Virgili Gianni, Nathan Congdon, Prabhath Piyasena, S Grace Prakalapakorn, Ruifan Zhang, Zixiang Zhao, Ving Fai Chan, Man Yu","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder of the tear film and ocular surface instability that causes ocular discomfort and visual impairment. The increasing use of digital devices and changing lifestyle patterns have raised concerns about a potential rise in DED among children. Understanding the prevalence of paediatric DED is crucial for developing effective diagnostic and management strategies tailored to this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An exhaustive literature search was performed on several databases covering the period from 1 January 2001 to 1 April 2024. Prevalence estimates of DED were combined using random effects models, and heterogeneity sources were explored through subgroup and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search identified 7309 articles, of which 41 articles, representing 42 study cohorts (48 479 participants) included in the systematic review. The estimated prevalence of DED among children was 23.7% (95% CI 18.5% to 28.9%). The prevalence of DED by different diagnostic criteria (clinical signs vs reported symptoms by questionnaire) was 16.6% (95% CI 13.7% to 19.5%; 26 studies; 27 107 children) vs 34.6% (95% CI 23.7% to 45.6%; 16 studies; 21 372 children; p<0.01), respectively. The prevalence of DED after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak was 44.1% (95% CI 25.5% to 62.7%; 8 studies; 9163 children), which was significantly higher than the 18.7% (95% CI 15.6% to 21.9%; 34studies, 39 316 children; p=0.01) before the COVID-19 outbreak. High between-study heterogeneity was noted (I<sup>2</sup>>92%). In meta-regression analysis, the prevalence of DED among children increased by 7.1% with each 10° decrease in latitude (p=0.015), and by 10.2% with each 10° increase in mean annual temperature (p=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DED is common in children up to 18 years of age and poses a significant disease burden. Standardisation of the diagnosis of DED in children and further study of other risk factors are needed to fully explain the epidemiology of DED in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of dry eye disease among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuhao Zou, Dongfeng Li, Virgili Gianni, Nathan Congdon, Prabhath Piyasena, S Grace Prakalapakorn, Ruifan Zhang, Zixiang Zhao, Ving Fai Chan, Man Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder of the tear film and ocular surface instability that causes ocular discomfort and visual impairment. The increasing use of digital devices and changing lifestyle patterns have raised concerns about a potential rise in DED among children. Understanding the prevalence of paediatric DED is crucial for developing effective diagnostic and management strategies tailored to this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An exhaustive literature search was performed on several databases covering the period from 1 January 2001 to 1 April 2024. Prevalence estimates of DED were combined using random effects models, and heterogeneity sources were explored through subgroup and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search identified 7309 articles, of which 41 articles, representing 42 study cohorts (48 479 participants) included in the systematic review. The estimated prevalence of DED among children was 23.7% (95% CI 18.5% to 28.9%). The prevalence of DED by different diagnostic criteria (clinical signs vs reported symptoms by questionnaire) was 16.6% (95% CI 13.7% to 19.5%; 26 studies; 27 107 children) vs 34.6% (95% CI 23.7% to 45.6%; 16 studies; 21 372 children; p<0.01), respectively. The prevalence of DED after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak was 44.1% (95% CI 25.5% to 62.7%; 8 studies; 9163 children), which was significantly higher than the 18.7% (95% CI 15.6% to 21.9%; 34studies, 39 316 children; p=0.01) before the COVID-19 outbreak. High between-study heterogeneity was noted (I<sup>2</sup>>92%). In meta-regression analysis, the prevalence of DED among children increased by 7.1% with each 10° decrease in latitude (p=0.015), and by 10.2% with each 10° increase in mean annual temperature (p=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DED is common in children up to 18 years of age and poses a significant disease burden. Standardisation of the diagnosis of DED in children and further study of other risk factors are needed to fully explain the epidemiology of DED in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840909/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:干眼病(DED)是一种由泪膜和眼表不稳定引起的多因素疾病,可引起眼部不适和视力损害。越来越多的人使用数码设备,生活方式也在不断改变,这引起了人们对儿童猝死症可能上升的担忧。了解儿科DED的患病率对于制定针对这一弱势群体的有效诊断和管理策略至关重要。方法:对2001年1月1日至2024年4月1日的几个数据库进行详尽的文献检索。采用随机效应模型对DED患病率进行组合,并通过亚组分析和回归分析探讨异质性来源。结果:我们的文献检索发现了7309篇文章,其中41篇文章,代表42个研究队列(48479名受试者)纳入了系统评价。估计儿童DED患病率为23.7% (95% CI 18.5%至28.9%)。不同诊断标准(临床症状与问卷报告症状)的DED患病率为16.6% (95% CI 13.7% ~ 19.5%;26的研究;27107名儿童)vs 34.6% (95% CI 23.7%至45.6%;16研究;21372名儿童;p2 > 92%)。在meta回归分析中,纬度每降低10°,儿童DED患病率增加7.1% (p=0.015),年平均气温每升高10°,儿童DED患病率增加10.2% (p=0.024)。结论:DED在18岁以下儿童中很常见,并造成重大的疾病负担。需要对儿童DED的诊断进行标准化,并进一步研究其他危险因素,以充分解释儿童DED的流行病学。
Prevalence of dry eye disease among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder of the tear film and ocular surface instability that causes ocular discomfort and visual impairment. The increasing use of digital devices and changing lifestyle patterns have raised concerns about a potential rise in DED among children. Understanding the prevalence of paediatric DED is crucial for developing effective diagnostic and management strategies tailored to this vulnerable population.
Method: An exhaustive literature search was performed on several databases covering the period from 1 January 2001 to 1 April 2024. Prevalence estimates of DED were combined using random effects models, and heterogeneity sources were explored through subgroup and regression analyses.
Results: Our literature search identified 7309 articles, of which 41 articles, representing 42 study cohorts (48 479 participants) included in the systematic review. The estimated prevalence of DED among children was 23.7% (95% CI 18.5% to 28.9%). The prevalence of DED by different diagnostic criteria (clinical signs vs reported symptoms by questionnaire) was 16.6% (95% CI 13.7% to 19.5%; 26 studies; 27 107 children) vs 34.6% (95% CI 23.7% to 45.6%; 16 studies; 21 372 children; p<0.01), respectively. The prevalence of DED after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak was 44.1% (95% CI 25.5% to 62.7%; 8 studies; 9163 children), which was significantly higher than the 18.7% (95% CI 15.6% to 21.9%; 34studies, 39 316 children; p=0.01) before the COVID-19 outbreak. High between-study heterogeneity was noted (I2>92%). In meta-regression analysis, the prevalence of DED among children increased by 7.1% with each 10° decrease in latitude (p=0.015), and by 10.2% with each 10° increase in mean annual temperature (p=0.024).
Conclusions: DED is common in children up to 18 years of age and poses a significant disease burden. Standardisation of the diagnosis of DED in children and further study of other risk factors are needed to fully explain the epidemiology of DED in children.