中欧成人和青少年小麦过敏的患病率和临床症状

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
A. Neyer, S. Dölle-Bierke, V. Höfer, J. Grünhagen, K. Beyer, M. Worm
{"title":"中欧成人和青少年小麦过敏的患病率和临床症状","authors":"A. Neyer,&nbsp;S. Dölle-Bierke,&nbsp;V. Höfer,&nbsp;J. Grünhagen,&nbsp;K. Beyer,&nbsp;M. Worm","doi":"10.1111/cea.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Wheat is a well-known elicitor of food allergy, but epidemiological data are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of wheat allergy in an unselected population of adults and adolescents and to characterise the clinical features of this cohort, as well as those of patients who experienced wheat-induced anaphylaxis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Fifteen thousand individuals aged 12–80 years were randomly selected, and a standardised questionnaire was applied. If symptoms after wheat consumption were reported, telephone interviews were conducted. In the case of suspected type 1 wheat allergy, a skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and oral food challenge (OFC) were performed. The prevalence of self-reported wheat sensitivity and wheat allergy was determined after data extrapolation. For the assessment of severe wheat allergy-associated symptoms, a cohort from the European Anaphylaxis Registry was analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The questionnaire was answered by 1770 individuals, of whom 13.1% reported symptoms due to the consumption of foods containing wheat. Following telephone interviews (<i>n</i> = 105) and clinical diagnostics (<i>n</i> = 22), type 1 sensitisation to wheat was confirmed in 8 individuals, and 2 subjects were finally diagnosed with an IgE-mediated wheat allergy. After extrapolation, the prevalence of confirmed wheat allergy in the German population reached 0.25% [95% CI 0.08–0.9]. Self-reported wheat sensitivity was predominantly seen in females (71%), with local gastrointestinal and non-specific symptoms. This contrasted with wheat-induced anaphylaxis, where less than half occurred in females, and symptoms were mainly skin, cardiovascular or respiratory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In a population with widespread wheat consumption, self-reported wheat sensitivity was common in adults and adolescents, but confirmed wheat allergy was rare. The distinct symptom profiles allow physicians to easily differentiate these entities. Dissemination of our findings may help to improve knowledge of the low prevalence of wheat allergy and may support the reduction of unnecessary dietary restrictions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":"55 4","pages":"319-329"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Clinical Symptoms of Wheat Allergy in Adults and Adolescents in Central Europe\",\"authors\":\"A. Neyer,&nbsp;S. Dölle-Bierke,&nbsp;V. Höfer,&nbsp;J. Grünhagen,&nbsp;K. Beyer,&nbsp;M. Worm\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cea.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Wheat is a well-known elicitor of food allergy, but epidemiological data are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of wheat allergy in an unselected population of adults and adolescents and to characterise the clinical features of this cohort, as well as those of patients who experienced wheat-induced anaphylaxis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Fifteen thousand individuals aged 12–80 years were randomly selected, and a standardised questionnaire was applied. If symptoms after wheat consumption were reported, telephone interviews were conducted. In the case of suspected type 1 wheat allergy, a skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and oral food challenge (OFC) were performed. The prevalence of self-reported wheat sensitivity and wheat allergy was determined after data extrapolation. For the assessment of severe wheat allergy-associated symptoms, a cohort from the European Anaphylaxis Registry was analysed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The questionnaire was answered by 1770 individuals, of whom 13.1% reported symptoms due to the consumption of foods containing wheat. Following telephone interviews (<i>n</i> = 105) and clinical diagnostics (<i>n</i> = 22), type 1 sensitisation to wheat was confirmed in 8 individuals, and 2 subjects were finally diagnosed with an IgE-mediated wheat allergy. After extrapolation, the prevalence of confirmed wheat allergy in the German population reached 0.25% [95% CI 0.08–0.9]. Self-reported wheat sensitivity was predominantly seen in females (71%), with local gastrointestinal and non-specific symptoms. This contrasted with wheat-induced anaphylaxis, where less than half occurred in females, and symptoms were mainly skin, cardiovascular or respiratory.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a population with widespread wheat consumption, self-reported wheat sensitivity was common in adults and adolescents, but confirmed wheat allergy was rare. The distinct symptom profiles allow physicians to easily differentiate these entities. Dissemination of our findings may help to improve knowledge of the low prevalence of wheat allergy and may support the reduction of unnecessary dietary restrictions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"319-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.70017\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.70017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.70017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小麦是众所周知的食物过敏诱因,但流行病学数据有限。本研究的目的是调查未选择的成人和青少年人群中小麦过敏的患病率,并描述该队列的临床特征,以及那些经历过小麦诱发过敏反应的患者。方法:进行以人群为基础的横断面研究。随机抽取1.5万名年龄在12-80岁之间的人,采用标准化问卷调查。如果报告了食用小麦后的症状,则进行电话采访。在疑似1型小麦过敏的病例中,进行皮肤点刺试验、特异性免疫球蛋白E (sIgE)和口服食物刺激(OFC)。自我报告的小麦敏感性和小麦过敏的患病率是在数据外推后确定的。为了评估严重小麦过敏相关症状,我们分析了欧洲过敏反应登记处的一个队列。结果:1770人回答了问卷,其中13.1%的人报告了因食用含小麦食品而出现的症状。通过电话访谈(n = 105)和临床诊断(n = 22), 8人被证实对小麦有1型致敏,2人最终被诊断为ige介导的小麦过敏。外推后,德国人群中确诊小麦过敏的患病率达到0.25% [95% CI 0.08-0.9]。自我报告的小麦敏感性主要见于女性(71%),伴有局部胃肠道和非特异性症状。这与小麦引起的过敏反应形成对比,其中不到一半发生在女性身上,症状主要是皮肤、心血管或呼吸系统。结论:在广泛食用小麦的人群中,自我报告的小麦敏感性在成人和青少年中很常见,但确诊的小麦过敏很少。不同的症状特征使医生能够很容易地区分这些实体。传播我们的研究结果可能有助于提高对小麦过敏低患病率的认识,并可能支持减少不必要的饮食限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevalence and Clinical Symptoms of Wheat Allergy in Adults and Adolescents in Central Europe

Prevalence and Clinical Symptoms of Wheat Allergy in Adults and Adolescents in Central Europe

Background

Wheat is a well-known elicitor of food allergy, but epidemiological data are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of wheat allergy in an unselected population of adults and adolescents and to characterise the clinical features of this cohort, as well as those of patients who experienced wheat-induced anaphylaxis.

Methods

A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Fifteen thousand individuals aged 12–80 years were randomly selected, and a standardised questionnaire was applied. If symptoms after wheat consumption were reported, telephone interviews were conducted. In the case of suspected type 1 wheat allergy, a skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and oral food challenge (OFC) were performed. The prevalence of self-reported wheat sensitivity and wheat allergy was determined after data extrapolation. For the assessment of severe wheat allergy-associated symptoms, a cohort from the European Anaphylaxis Registry was analysed.

Results

The questionnaire was answered by 1770 individuals, of whom 13.1% reported symptoms due to the consumption of foods containing wheat. Following telephone interviews (n = 105) and clinical diagnostics (n = 22), type 1 sensitisation to wheat was confirmed in 8 individuals, and 2 subjects were finally diagnosed with an IgE-mediated wheat allergy. After extrapolation, the prevalence of confirmed wheat allergy in the German population reached 0.25% [95% CI 0.08–0.9]. Self-reported wheat sensitivity was predominantly seen in females (71%), with local gastrointestinal and non-specific symptoms. This contrasted with wheat-induced anaphylaxis, where less than half occurred in females, and symptoms were mainly skin, cardiovascular or respiratory.

Conclusion

In a population with widespread wheat consumption, self-reported wheat sensitivity was common in adults and adolescents, but confirmed wheat allergy was rare. The distinct symptom profiles allow physicians to easily differentiate these entities. Dissemination of our findings may help to improve knowledge of the low prevalence of wheat allergy and may support the reduction of unnecessary dietary restrictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信