华法林患者的治疗时间范围随着目标国际标准化比率范围的增加而下降。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001347
Imran Malik, Paul Priest, Ian Jennings, Keith Gomez
{"title":"华法林患者的治疗时间范围随着目标国际标准化比率范围的增加而下降。","authors":"Imran Malik, Paul Priest, Ian Jennings, Keith Gomez","doi":"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main objective was to assess whether the time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) in patients on warfarin is affected by the international normalized ratio (INR) range. We also evaluated whether the performance of the INR is negatively impacted as its absolute value increases. First, we extracted key performance indicators of the INR from 22 surveys of the UK National External Quality Assurance Scheme (NEQAS). We then analysed TTR in 6584 warfarin monitoring episodes that were categorized by range and indication. NEQAS surveys in which the sample INR was above 3.0 had more participants outwith consensus with higher coefficient of variation and standard error mean. The outwith consensus percentage was correlated with the mean reported INR value. In warfarinised patients, we found that the TTR was lower at INR ranges above the standard 2.0 to 3.0. We concluded that the performance of the INR assay decreases at higher values. Furthermore, increasing the INR range above the standard 2.0 to 3.0 in warfarinised patients has an adverse effect on TTR. This is important because the INR range may be increased to try and improve efficacy, whereas these data suggest that it may have the opposite effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":" ","pages":"78-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-in-therapeutic range falls as the target international normalized ratio range increases in patients on warfarin.\",\"authors\":\"Imran Malik, Paul Priest, Ian Jennings, Keith Gomez\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The main objective was to assess whether the time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) in patients on warfarin is affected by the international normalized ratio (INR) range. We also evaluated whether the performance of the INR is negatively impacted as its absolute value increases. First, we extracted key performance indicators of the INR from 22 surveys of the UK National External Quality Assurance Scheme (NEQAS). We then analysed TTR in 6584 warfarin monitoring episodes that were categorized by range and indication. NEQAS surveys in which the sample INR was above 3.0 had more participants outwith consensus with higher coefficient of variation and standard error mean. The outwith consensus percentage was correlated with the mean reported INR value. In warfarinised patients, we found that the TTR was lower at INR ranges above the standard 2.0 to 3.0. We concluded that the performance of the INR assay decreases at higher values. Furthermore, increasing the INR range above the standard 2.0 to 3.0 in warfarinised patients has an adverse effect on TTR. This is important because the INR range may be increased to try and improve efficacy, whereas these data suggest that it may have the opposite effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"78-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001347\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主要目的是评估华法林患者的治疗时间范围(TTR)是否受到国际标准化比值(INR)范围的影响。我们还评估了印度卢比的表现是否会随着其绝对值的增加而受到负面影响。首先,我们从英国国家外部质量保证计划(NEQAS)的22项调查中提取了印度卢比的关键绩效指标。然后,我们分析了6584例华法林监测发作的TTR,这些发作按范围和适应症分类。在样本INR大于3.0的NEQAS调查中,有更多的参与者不符合一致性,变异系数和标准误差均值较高。outwith consensus百分比与报告的平均INR值相关。在华法林患者中,我们发现在INR高于标准2.0至3.0的范围内,TTR较低。我们得出结论,INR测定的性能在较高的值下降。此外,将华法林患者的INR范围提高到2.0至3.0以上对TTR有不利影响。这一点很重要,因为为了提高疗效,可能会增加INR范围,而这些数据表明,它可能会产生相反的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-in-therapeutic range falls as the target international normalized ratio range increases in patients on warfarin.

The main objective was to assess whether the time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) in patients on warfarin is affected by the international normalized ratio (INR) range. We also evaluated whether the performance of the INR is negatively impacted as its absolute value increases. First, we extracted key performance indicators of the INR from 22 surveys of the UK National External Quality Assurance Scheme (NEQAS). We then analysed TTR in 6584 warfarin monitoring episodes that were categorized by range and indication. NEQAS surveys in which the sample INR was above 3.0 had more participants outwith consensus with higher coefficient of variation and standard error mean. The outwith consensus percentage was correlated with the mean reported INR value. In warfarinised patients, we found that the TTR was lower at INR ranges above the standard 2.0 to 3.0. We concluded that the performance of the INR assay decreases at higher values. Furthermore, increasing the INR range above the standard 2.0 to 3.0 in warfarinised patients has an adverse effect on TTR. This is important because the INR range may be increased to try and improve efficacy, whereas these data suggest that it may have the opposite effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信