Normosol-R与乳酸林格在危重患者中的对照:一项随机试验

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.008
Edward T Qian, Ryan M Brown, Karen E Jackson, Li Wang, Joanna L Stollings, Robert E Freundlich, Jonathan P Wanderer, Edward D Siew, Gordon R Bernard, Wesley H Self, Jonathan D Casey, Todd W Rice, Matthew W Semler
{"title":"Normosol-R与乳酸林格在危重患者中的对照:一项随机试验","authors":"Edward T Qian, Ryan M Brown, Karen E Jackson, Li Wang, Joanna L Stollings, Robert E Freundlich, Jonathan P Wanderer, Edward D Siew, Gordon R Bernard, Wesley H Self, Jonathan D Casey, Todd W Rice, Matthew W Semler","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balanced crystalloid solutions may improve clinical outcomes compared with saline for some critically ill adults, but it is unclear whether differences in composition between balanced crystalloid solutions affect outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the choice of balanced crystalloid solutions (Normosol-R vs lactated Ringers) impact acid-base status, organ function, or outcomes for critically ill adults?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial at an academic medical center in the United States compared the use of Normosol-R vs lactated Ringers among critically ill adults. The primary outcome was the plasma bicarbonate (HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) concentration between enrollment and 7 days. Secondary outcomes included receipt of kidney replacement therapy and death by day 30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019, 2,084 patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years, 1,006 patients (48.3%) were female, and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 5 (interquartile range, 3-8). HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentration between enrollment and 7 days did not differ between the Normosol-R and lactated Ringers groups (mean difference, -0.12 mmol/dL; 95% CI, -0.61 to 0.36; P = .61). A total of 58 patients (6.0%) in the Normosol-R group and 47 patients (5.0%) in the lactated Ringers group received new kidney replacement therapy (absolute risk difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -1.2% to 3.1%). Death by day 30 occurred in 172 patients (16.3%) in the Normosol-R group and 164 patients (16.0%) in the lactated Ringers group (absolute risk difference, 0.3%; 95% CI, -2.9% to 3.6%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among critically ill adults, the use of Normosol-R for IV fluid therapy did not affect plasma HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentrations or clinical outcomes compared with lactated Ringers.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03537898; URL: www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normosol-R vs Lactated Ringers in the Critically Ill: A Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Edward T Qian, Ryan M Brown, Karen E Jackson, Li Wang, Joanna L Stollings, Robert E Freundlich, Jonathan P Wanderer, Edward D Siew, Gordon R Bernard, Wesley H Self, Jonathan D Casey, Todd W Rice, Matthew W Semler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balanced crystalloid solutions may improve clinical outcomes compared with saline for some critically ill adults, but it is unclear whether differences in composition between balanced crystalloid solutions affect outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the choice of balanced crystalloid solutions (Normosol-R vs lactated Ringers) impact acid-base status, organ function, or outcomes for critically ill adults?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial at an academic medical center in the United States compared the use of Normosol-R vs lactated Ringers among critically ill adults. The primary outcome was the plasma bicarbonate (HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) concentration between enrollment and 7 days. Secondary outcomes included receipt of kidney replacement therapy and death by day 30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019, 2,084 patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years, 1,006 patients (48.3%) were female, and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 5 (interquartile range, 3-8). HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentration between enrollment and 7 days did not differ between the Normosol-R and lactated Ringers groups (mean difference, -0.12 mmol/dL; 95% CI, -0.61 to 0.36; P = .61). A total of 58 patients (6.0%) in the Normosol-R group and 47 patients (5.0%) in the lactated Ringers group received new kidney replacement therapy (absolute risk difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -1.2% to 3.1%). Death by day 30 occurred in 172 patients (16.3%) in the Normosol-R group and 164 patients (16.0%) in the lactated Ringers group (absolute risk difference, 0.3%; 95% CI, -2.9% to 3.6%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among critically ill adults, the use of Normosol-R for IV fluid therapy did not affect plasma HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentrations or clinical outcomes compared with lactated Ringers.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03537898; URL: www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于一些危重成人,与生理盐水相比,平衡晶体溶液可能改善临床结果,但目前尚不清楚平衡晶体溶液的成分差异是否会影响结果。研究问题:选择平衡的晶体溶液(normosolr vs .乳酸林格)是否会影响危重成人的酸碱状态、器官功能或结局?研究设计和方法:这项实用的、集群随机的、多交叉试验在美国的一个学术医学中心进行,比较了在危重成人中Normosol-R和乳酸林格的使用。主要终点是入组至第7天的血浆碳酸氢盐浓度。次要结局包括接受肾脏替代治疗和第30天死亡。结果:2018年6月1日至2019年1月31日期间,共有2084名患者入组。中位年龄为59岁,女性1006例(48.3%),序贯性器官衰竭评分中位为5分(四分位数范围为3-8分)。入组至第7天的碳酸氢盐浓度在Normosol-R组和乳酸林格斯组之间没有差异(平均差异为-0.12 mmol/dL;95%置信区间[CI], -0.61 ~ 0.36, p值= 0.61)。Normosol-R组共有58例(6.0%)患者接受了新的肾脏替代治疗,乳酸Ringers组有47例(5.0%)患者接受了新的肾脏替代治疗(绝对风险差为1.0%;95%CI, -1.2%至3.1%)。Normosol-R组有172例(16.3%)患者在第30天死亡,泌乳林格斯组有164例(16.0%)患者死亡(绝对风险差异为0.3%;95%CI, -2.9%至3.6%)。解释:在危重成人中,与乳酸林格相比,使用normosolr进行静脉输液治疗不会影响血浆碳酸氢盐浓度或临床结果。临床试验注册号:NCT03537898。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normosol-R vs Lactated Ringers in the Critically Ill: A Randomized Trial.

Background: Balanced crystalloid solutions may improve clinical outcomes compared with saline for some critically ill adults, but it is unclear whether differences in composition between balanced crystalloid solutions affect outcomes.

Research question: Does the choice of balanced crystalloid solutions (Normosol-R vs lactated Ringers) impact acid-base status, organ function, or outcomes for critically ill adults?

Study design and methods: This pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial at an academic medical center in the United States compared the use of Normosol-R vs lactated Ringers among critically ill adults. The primary outcome was the plasma bicarbonate (HCO3-) concentration between enrollment and 7 days. Secondary outcomes included receipt of kidney replacement therapy and death by day 30.

Results: Between June 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019, 2,084 patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years, 1,006 patients (48.3%) were female, and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 5 (interquartile range, 3-8). HCO3- concentration between enrollment and 7 days did not differ between the Normosol-R and lactated Ringers groups (mean difference, -0.12 mmol/dL; 95% CI, -0.61 to 0.36; P = .61). A total of 58 patients (6.0%) in the Normosol-R group and 47 patients (5.0%) in the lactated Ringers group received new kidney replacement therapy (absolute risk difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -1.2% to 3.1%). Death by day 30 occurred in 172 patients (16.3%) in the Normosol-R group and 164 patients (16.0%) in the lactated Ringers group (absolute risk difference, 0.3%; 95% CI, -2.9% to 3.6%).

Interpretation: Among critically ill adults, the use of Normosol-R for IV fluid therapy did not affect plasma HCO3- concentrations or clinical outcomes compared with lactated Ringers.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03537898; URL: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信