鼻咽癌诱导化疗后缩小体积放疗与常规体积放疗:一项开放标签、非劣效性、多中心、随机3期试验

IF 503.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ling-Long Tang MD, Lin Chen MD, Gui-Qiong Xu MD, Ning Zhang MD, Cheng-Long Huang MD, Wen-Fei Li MD, Yan-Ping Mao MD, Guan-Qun Zhou MD, Feng Lei MD, Lu-Si Chen MD, Shao Hui Huang MD, Lei Chen MD, Yu-Pei Chen MD, Yuan Zhang MD, Xu Liu MD, Cheng Xu MD, Yin Zhao PhD, Ji-Bin Li MD, Na Liu PhD, Fang-Yun Xie MD, Rui Guo MD, Ying Sun MD, Jun Ma MD
{"title":"鼻咽癌诱导化疗后缩小体积放疗与常规体积放疗:一项开放标签、非劣效性、多中心、随机3期试验","authors":"Ling-Long Tang MD,&nbsp;Lin Chen MD,&nbsp;Gui-Qiong Xu MD,&nbsp;Ning Zhang MD,&nbsp;Cheng-Long Huang MD,&nbsp;Wen-Fei Li MD,&nbsp;Yan-Ping Mao MD,&nbsp;Guan-Qun Zhou MD,&nbsp;Feng Lei MD,&nbsp;Lu-Si Chen MD,&nbsp;Shao Hui Huang MD,&nbsp;Lei Chen MD,&nbsp;Yu-Pei Chen MD,&nbsp;Yuan Zhang MD,&nbsp;Xu Liu MD,&nbsp;Cheng Xu MD,&nbsp;Yin Zhao PhD,&nbsp;Ji-Bin Li MD,&nbsp;Na Liu PhD,&nbsp;Fang-Yun Xie MD,&nbsp;Rui Guo MD,&nbsp;Ying Sun MD,&nbsp;Jun Ma MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.21881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nearly 90% locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) responds to induction chemotherapy (IC) with significant tumor volume shrinkage. Radiotherapy always follows IC, and reduced volume has been proposed. However, the efficacy and safety of reduced-volume radiotherapy is uncertain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this multi-center, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial, patients with LANPC who completed IC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive reduced-volume radiotherapy based on post-IC tumor volume (Post-IC group) or conventional volume radiotherapy based on pre-IC tumor volume (Pre-IC group). The primary endpoint was locoregional relapse-free survival, with a noninferiority margin of 8%. Secondary endpoints comprised adverse events, and quality of life (QoL).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between August 7, 2020, and May 27, 2022, 445 patients were randomly assigned to Post-IC (<i>n</i> = 225) or Pre-IC (<i>n</i> = 220) groups. The average volume receiving radical dose was 66.6 cm<sup>3</sup> in Post-IC group versus 80.9 cm<sup>3</sup>. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, the 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival was 91.5% in the Post-IC group versus 91.2%, with a difference of 0.3% (95% confidence interval −4.9% to 5.5%). The incidence of grade 3-4 radiation-related toxicity was lower in the Post-IC group including: acute mucositis (19.8% vs 34.1%), late otitis media (9.5% vs 20.9%) and late dry month (3.6% vs 9.5%). The Post-IC group had better QoL for global health status, physical functioning, emotional functioning, dry mouth and sticky saliva.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this trial, reduced-volume radiotherapy was noninferior to conventional volume radiotherapy in locoregional relapse-free survival, and was associated with lower toxicities and improved QoL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04384627).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"75 3","pages":"203-215"},"PeriodicalIF":503.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21881","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced-volume radiotherapy versus conventional-volume radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open-label, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial\",\"authors\":\"Ling-Long Tang MD,&nbsp;Lin Chen MD,&nbsp;Gui-Qiong Xu MD,&nbsp;Ning Zhang MD,&nbsp;Cheng-Long Huang MD,&nbsp;Wen-Fei Li MD,&nbsp;Yan-Ping Mao MD,&nbsp;Guan-Qun Zhou MD,&nbsp;Feng Lei MD,&nbsp;Lu-Si Chen MD,&nbsp;Shao Hui Huang MD,&nbsp;Lei Chen MD,&nbsp;Yu-Pei Chen MD,&nbsp;Yuan Zhang MD,&nbsp;Xu Liu MD,&nbsp;Cheng Xu MD,&nbsp;Yin Zhao PhD,&nbsp;Ji-Bin Li MD,&nbsp;Na Liu PhD,&nbsp;Fang-Yun Xie MD,&nbsp;Rui Guo MD,&nbsp;Ying Sun MD,&nbsp;Jun Ma MD\",\"doi\":\"10.3322/caac.21881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nearly 90% locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) responds to induction chemotherapy (IC) with significant tumor volume shrinkage. Radiotherapy always follows IC, and reduced volume has been proposed. However, the efficacy and safety of reduced-volume radiotherapy is uncertain.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this multi-center, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial, patients with LANPC who completed IC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive reduced-volume radiotherapy based on post-IC tumor volume (Post-IC group) or conventional volume radiotherapy based on pre-IC tumor volume (Pre-IC group). The primary endpoint was locoregional relapse-free survival, with a noninferiority margin of 8%. Secondary endpoints comprised adverse events, and quality of life (QoL).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between August 7, 2020, and May 27, 2022, 445 patients were randomly assigned to Post-IC (<i>n</i> = 225) or Pre-IC (<i>n</i> = 220) groups. The average volume receiving radical dose was 66.6 cm<sup>3</sup> in Post-IC group versus 80.9 cm<sup>3</sup>. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, the 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival was 91.5% in the Post-IC group versus 91.2%, with a difference of 0.3% (95% confidence interval −4.9% to 5.5%). The incidence of grade 3-4 radiation-related toxicity was lower in the Post-IC group including: acute mucositis (19.8% vs 34.1%), late otitis media (9.5% vs 20.9%) and late dry month (3.6% vs 9.5%). The Post-IC group had better QoL for global health status, physical functioning, emotional functioning, dry mouth and sticky saliva.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this trial, reduced-volume radiotherapy was noninferior to conventional volume radiotherapy in locoregional relapse-free survival, and was associated with lower toxicities and improved QoL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04384627).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians\",\"volume\":\"75 3\",\"pages\":\"203-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":503.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.21881\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21881\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21881","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近90%的局部晚期鼻咽癌(LANPC)对诱导化疗(IC)有反应,肿瘤体积明显缩小。放疗总是遵循IC,并建议缩小体积。然而,小体积放疗的有效性和安全性尚不确定。方法:在这项多中心、非劣效性、随机对照试验中,完成IC的LANPC患者被随机(1:1)分配到根据IC后肿瘤体积进行缩小体积放疗(后IC组)或根据IC前肿瘤体积进行常规体积放疗(前IC组)。主要终点是局部无复发生存率,非劣效性裕度为8%。次要终点包括不良事件和生活质量(QoL)。结果:在2020年8月7日至2022年5月27日期间,445名患者被随机分配到ic后(n = 225)或ic前(n = 220)组。ic后组接受自由基剂量的平均体积为66.6 cm3,而ic后组为80.9 cm3。中位随访40.4个月后,ic后组3年局部无复发生存率为91.5%,差异为91.2%,差异为0.3%(95%可信区间-4.9%至5.5%)。ic后组的3-4级辐射相关毒性发生率较低,包括:急性粘膜炎(19.8%对34.1%),中耳炎晚期(9.5%对20.9%)和干月晚期(3.6%对9.5%)。ic后组在整体健康状况、身体功能、情绪功能、口干和唾液粘稠方面的生活质量更好。结论:在本试验中,小体积放疗在局部无复发生存方面不低于常规大体积放疗,并且与较低的毒性和改善的生活质量相关。(ClinicalTrials.gov识别码NCT04384627)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reduced-volume radiotherapy versus conventional-volume radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open-label, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial

Reduced-volume radiotherapy versus conventional-volume radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open-label, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial

Background

Nearly 90% locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) responds to induction chemotherapy (IC) with significant tumor volume shrinkage. Radiotherapy always follows IC, and reduced volume has been proposed. However, the efficacy and safety of reduced-volume radiotherapy is uncertain.

Methods

In this multi-center, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial, patients with LANPC who completed IC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive reduced-volume radiotherapy based on post-IC tumor volume (Post-IC group) or conventional volume radiotherapy based on pre-IC tumor volume (Pre-IC group). The primary endpoint was locoregional relapse-free survival, with a noninferiority margin of 8%. Secondary endpoints comprised adverse events, and quality of life (QoL).

Results

Between August 7, 2020, and May 27, 2022, 445 patients were randomly assigned to Post-IC (n = 225) or Pre-IC (n = 220) groups. The average volume receiving radical dose was 66.6 cm3 in Post-IC group versus 80.9 cm3. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, the 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival was 91.5% in the Post-IC group versus 91.2%, with a difference of 0.3% (95% confidence interval −4.9% to 5.5%). The incidence of grade 3-4 radiation-related toxicity was lower in the Post-IC group including: acute mucositis (19.8% vs 34.1%), late otitis media (9.5% vs 20.9%) and late dry month (3.6% vs 9.5%). The Post-IC group had better QoL for global health status, physical functioning, emotional functioning, dry mouth and sticky saliva.

Conclusions

In this trial, reduced-volume radiotherapy was noninferior to conventional volume radiotherapy in locoregional relapse-free survival, and was associated with lower toxicities and improved QoL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04384627).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
873.20
自引率
0.10%
发文量
51
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians" has been published by the American Cancer Society since 1950, making it one of the oldest peer-reviewed journals in oncology. It maintains the highest impact factor among all ISI-ranked journals. The journal effectively reaches a broad and diverse audience of health professionals, offering a unique platform to disseminate information on cancer prevention, early detection, various treatment modalities, palliative care, advocacy matters, quality-of-life topics, and more. As the premier journal of the American Cancer Society, it publishes mission-driven content that significantly influences patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信