powercheck呼吸道病毒面板RT-PCR检测包括SARS-CoV-2在内的16种呼吸道病毒的比较评价

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY
Jinyeong Kim, Eunhee Han, Jieun Kim, Young Jin Kim, Mi Hyun Bae
{"title":"powercheck呼吸道病毒面板RT-PCR检测包括SARS-CoV-2在内的16种呼吸道病毒的比较评价","authors":"Jinyeong Kim,&nbsp;Eunhee Han,&nbsp;Jieun Kim,&nbsp;Young Jin Kim,&nbsp;Mi Hyun Bae","doi":"10.1002/jmv.70243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The endemic transition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has made diagnosis of acute respiratory infections complex. There is a demand for tests that can detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with other respiratory viruses. The PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel (PowerChek, Kogenebiotech) is a newly developed real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay that simultaneously detects SARS-CoV-2 and 15 other respiratory viruses; however, its performance requires assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the PowerChek assay with that of established RT-PCR assays. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained from patients with acute respiratory symptoms. Specimens were tested using the Allplex Respiratory Virus panel, Allplex SARS-CoV-2 PCR assays (Allplex, Seegene), and PowerChek assay. In total, 407 specimens were tested. The PowerChek assay detected all positive cases identified by the Allplex assays and 11 additional detection targets in 10 specimens. The overall agreement between the two assays was 97.5% (397/407). The PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel assay demonstrated a reliable performance comparable to that of established RT-PCR assays. This assay could be clinically useful because the simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses and pre-dispensed RT-PCR reagents can simplify testing and diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Virology","volume":"97 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of the PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel RT-PCR Assay Detecting 16 Respiratory Viruses Including SARS-CoV-2\",\"authors\":\"Jinyeong Kim,&nbsp;Eunhee Han,&nbsp;Jieun Kim,&nbsp;Young Jin Kim,&nbsp;Mi Hyun Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmv.70243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The endemic transition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has made diagnosis of acute respiratory infections complex. There is a demand for tests that can detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with other respiratory viruses. The PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel (PowerChek, Kogenebiotech) is a newly developed real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay that simultaneously detects SARS-CoV-2 and 15 other respiratory viruses; however, its performance requires assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the PowerChek assay with that of established RT-PCR assays. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained from patients with acute respiratory symptoms. Specimens were tested using the Allplex Respiratory Virus panel, Allplex SARS-CoV-2 PCR assays (Allplex, Seegene), and PowerChek assay. In total, 407 specimens were tested. The PowerChek assay detected all positive cases identified by the Allplex assays and 11 additional detection targets in 10 specimens. The overall agreement between the two assays was 97.5% (397/407). The PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel assay demonstrated a reliable performance comparable to that of established RT-PCR assays. This assay could be clinically useful because the simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses and pre-dispensed RT-PCR reagents can simplify testing and diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"volume\":\"97 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的地方性转变使急性呼吸道感染的诊断变得复杂。对能够检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)与其他呼吸道病毒的检测方法有需求。PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel (PowerChek, Kogenebiotech)是一种新开发的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测方法,可同时检测SARS-CoV-2和其他15种呼吸道病毒;然而,它的表现需要评估。本研究的目的是比较powercheck检测与已建立的RT-PCR检测的性能。对急性呼吸道症状患者采集鼻咽拭子标本。使用Allplex Respiratory Virus panel、Allplex SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay (Allplex、Seegene)和powercheck assay对标本进行检测。共检测标本407份。PowerChek检测检测出Allplex检测确定的所有阳性病例,并在10个标本中检测出11个额外的检测靶点。两种检测方法的总体一致性为97.5%(397/407)。powercheck呼吸道病毒面板检测显示出与已建立的RT-PCR检测相当的可靠性能。由于同时检测SARS-CoV-2和其他呼吸道病毒以及预分配的RT-PCR试剂可以简化检测和诊断,因此该检测方法可能具有临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of the PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel RT-PCR Assay Detecting 16 Respiratory Viruses Including SARS-CoV-2

The endemic transition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has made diagnosis of acute respiratory infections complex. There is a demand for tests that can detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with other respiratory viruses. The PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel (PowerChek, Kogenebiotech) is a newly developed real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay that simultaneously detects SARS-CoV-2 and 15 other respiratory viruses; however, its performance requires assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the PowerChek assay with that of established RT-PCR assays. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained from patients with acute respiratory symptoms. Specimens were tested using the Allplex Respiratory Virus panel, Allplex SARS-CoV-2 PCR assays (Allplex, Seegene), and PowerChek assay. In total, 407 specimens were tested. The PowerChek assay detected all positive cases identified by the Allplex assays and 11 additional detection targets in 10 specimens. The overall agreement between the two assays was 97.5% (397/407). The PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel assay demonstrated a reliable performance comparable to that of established RT-PCR assays. This assay could be clinically useful because the simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses and pre-dispensed RT-PCR reagents can simplify testing and diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Virology
Journal of Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
777
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Virology focuses on publishing original scientific papers on both basic and applied research related to viruses that affect humans. The journal publishes reports covering a wide range of topics, including the characterization, diagnosis, epidemiology, immunology, and pathogenesis of human virus infections. It also includes studies on virus morphology, genetics, replication, and interactions with host cells. The intended readership of the journal includes virologists, microbiologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, diagnostic laboratory technologists, epidemiologists, hematologists, and cell biologists. The Journal of Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Abstracts in Anthropology (Sage), CABI, AgBiotech News & Information, National Agricultural Library, Biological Abstracts, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, Veterinary Bulletin, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信