评估拉丁美洲安第斯和南锥体国家的贸易集团和社会政策,并考虑古巴政治

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Isidro Morales
{"title":"评估拉丁美洲安第斯和南锥体国家的贸易集团和社会政策,并考虑古巴政治","authors":"Isidro Morales","doi":"10.1111/lamp.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This first issue of Latin American Policy (LAC) for 2025 includes six pieces of high-quality policy research and an opinion article. Alan Fairlie Reinoso and Stacy Alvarado Paipay estimate inequality indexes and assess the presence of convergence within and among Latin American integration blocs—The Pacific Alliance, the Andean Community and the Southern Common Market. They conclude that inequality has increased from 1990 to 2021, with Mercosur exhibiting the highest levels of inequality, followed by the Andean Community and the Pacific Alliance. They also demonstrate a lack of economic convergence between the Southern Common Market and the Andean Community during periods of unilateral trade liberalization, North–South free trade agreements, and the commodities boom.</p><p>Francisco Santos-Carrillo and Bruno Theodoro Luciano review the structures, processes, and outcomes of civil society participation in regional governance in three representative regional projects—the Andean Community, The Southern Common Market, and the Central American Integration System. They argue that despite some differences in institutional design, with the Central American Integration System developing a supranational logic of membership in contrast to the intergovernmental settings of the other two cases, social participation in the three cases is limited to agenda facilitation, and its effects on regional decision-making is residual.</p><p>Tiago Soares Nogara examines the redefinition of the Common Southern Market during the rise of Latin America's pink tide, focusing on how debates over Venezuela's accession intersect with the broader context of post-neoliberal regionalism. He concludes that conflicts surrounding Venezuela's entry were pivotal in determining Mercosur's trajectory, revealing both the potential and the limits of post-neoliberal integration at that time.</p><p>Santiago Albuja argues that international organizations played a relevant role in designing the Human Development Bonus in Ecuador by imposing structural adjustment reforms, establishing the conditions for the delivery of loans, and offering technical assistance. Meanwhile, Mitchell Gallagher analyzes the Taiwan–Paraguay diplomatic bond through constructivism centering norms, identities, and intersubjectivities. He argues that Taiwan and Paraguay's fidelity flows from a bedrock commitment to ideals of liberal democracy, self-determination, and human rights.</p><p>Milva Geri, Fernanda Villarreal, and Nebel Moscoso explore the determinants of contribution density to the Argentine pension system using administrative data from 1996 to 2021. They conclude that the density of contributions is low and depends on the branch of economic activity, the jurisdiction where the company is located, the individual's income and gender, and the age of enrollment.</p><p>Finally, Armando Chaguaceda's opinion article gives insight into how the Cuban regime is now facing domestic and global challenges. His text examines the conceptual elements that explain the Cuban model, its changes and institutional continuities, and the emerging challenges of a mobilized citizenry that questions its legitimacy.</p><p>We hope our readers will enjoy the selected collection we prepared for the present volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":42501,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Policy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lamp.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Latin America's Trade Blocs and Social Policies in Andean and Southern Cone Countries, and Considering Cuban Politics\",\"authors\":\"Isidro Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lamp.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This first issue of Latin American Policy (LAC) for 2025 includes six pieces of high-quality policy research and an opinion article. Alan Fairlie Reinoso and Stacy Alvarado Paipay estimate inequality indexes and assess the presence of convergence within and among Latin American integration blocs—The Pacific Alliance, the Andean Community and the Southern Common Market. They conclude that inequality has increased from 1990 to 2021, with Mercosur exhibiting the highest levels of inequality, followed by the Andean Community and the Pacific Alliance. They also demonstrate a lack of economic convergence between the Southern Common Market and the Andean Community during periods of unilateral trade liberalization, North–South free trade agreements, and the commodities boom.</p><p>Francisco Santos-Carrillo and Bruno Theodoro Luciano review the structures, processes, and outcomes of civil society participation in regional governance in three representative regional projects—the Andean Community, The Southern Common Market, and the Central American Integration System. They argue that despite some differences in institutional design, with the Central American Integration System developing a supranational logic of membership in contrast to the intergovernmental settings of the other two cases, social participation in the three cases is limited to agenda facilitation, and its effects on regional decision-making is residual.</p><p>Tiago Soares Nogara examines the redefinition of the Common Southern Market during the rise of Latin America's pink tide, focusing on how debates over Venezuela's accession intersect with the broader context of post-neoliberal regionalism. He concludes that conflicts surrounding Venezuela's entry were pivotal in determining Mercosur's trajectory, revealing both the potential and the limits of post-neoliberal integration at that time.</p><p>Santiago Albuja argues that international organizations played a relevant role in designing the Human Development Bonus in Ecuador by imposing structural adjustment reforms, establishing the conditions for the delivery of loans, and offering technical assistance. Meanwhile, Mitchell Gallagher analyzes the Taiwan–Paraguay diplomatic bond through constructivism centering norms, identities, and intersubjectivities. He argues that Taiwan and Paraguay's fidelity flows from a bedrock commitment to ideals of liberal democracy, self-determination, and human rights.</p><p>Milva Geri, Fernanda Villarreal, and Nebel Moscoso explore the determinants of contribution density to the Argentine pension system using administrative data from 1996 to 2021. They conclude that the density of contributions is low and depends on the branch of economic activity, the jurisdiction where the company is located, the individual's income and gender, and the age of enrollment.</p><p>Finally, Armando Chaguaceda's opinion article gives insight into how the Cuban regime is now facing domestic and global challenges. His text examines the conceptual elements that explain the Cuban model, its changes and institutional continuities, and the emerging challenges of a mobilized citizenry that questions its legitimacy.</p><p>We hope our readers will enjoy the selected collection we prepared for the present volume.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Policy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lamp.70007\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.70007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《2025年拉丁美洲政策》首期包括六篇高质量的政策研究和一篇观点文章。Alan Fairlie Reinoso和Stacy Alvarado Paipay估计了不平等指数,并评估了拉丁美洲一体化集团(太平洋联盟、安第斯共同体和南方共同市场)内部和之间趋同的存在。他们得出的结论是,从1990年到2021年,不平等现象有所加剧,南方共同市场的不平等程度最高,其次是安第斯共同体和太平洋联盟。它们还表明,在单边贸易自由化、南北自由贸易协定和大宗商品繁荣时期,南方共同市场和安第斯共同体之间缺乏经济趋同。弗朗西斯科·桑托斯-卡里略和布鲁诺·西奥多罗·卢西亚诺在三个具有代表性的区域项目——安第斯共同体、南方共同市场和中美洲一体化体系——中回顾了公民社会参与区域治理的结构、过程和结果。他们认为,尽管在制度设计上存在一些差异,与其他两个案例的政府间环境相比,中美洲一体化体系发展出一种超国家的成员逻辑,但这三个案例中的社会参与仅限于促进议程,其对区域决策的影响是残余的。Tiago Soares Nogara考察了在拉丁美洲粉红浪潮兴起期间对南方共同市场的重新定义,重点关注委内瑞拉加入的辩论如何与后新自由主义地区主义的更广泛背景相交叉。他的结论是,围绕委内瑞拉加入的冲突是决定南方共同市场轨迹的关键,揭示了当时后新自由主义一体化的潜力和局限性。Santiago Albuja认为,国际组织通过实施结构调整改革、确定提供贷款的条件和提供技术援助,在厄瓜多尔设计人类发展奖金方面发挥了相关作用。同时,Mitchell Gallagher以建构主义理论为中心,以规范、认同、主体间性为中心,分析台湾与巴拉圭的外交关系。Milva Geri、Fernanda Villarreal和Nebel Moscoso利用1996年至2021年的行政数据探讨了阿根廷养老金体系缴费密度的决定因素。他们得出的结论是,捐款的密度很低,这取决于经济活动的分支、公司所在的司法管辖区、个人的收入和性别,以及注册的年龄。最后,Armando Chaguaceda的观点文章深入分析了古巴政权目前面临的国内和全球挑战。他的文章考察了解释古巴模式的概念要素,它的变化和制度的连续性,以及质疑其合法性的动员公民的新挑战。我们希望我们的读者会喜欢我们为本卷准备的精选集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Latin America's Trade Blocs and Social Policies in Andean and Southern Cone Countries, and Considering Cuban Politics

This first issue of Latin American Policy (LAC) for 2025 includes six pieces of high-quality policy research and an opinion article. Alan Fairlie Reinoso and Stacy Alvarado Paipay estimate inequality indexes and assess the presence of convergence within and among Latin American integration blocs—The Pacific Alliance, the Andean Community and the Southern Common Market. They conclude that inequality has increased from 1990 to 2021, with Mercosur exhibiting the highest levels of inequality, followed by the Andean Community and the Pacific Alliance. They also demonstrate a lack of economic convergence between the Southern Common Market and the Andean Community during periods of unilateral trade liberalization, North–South free trade agreements, and the commodities boom.

Francisco Santos-Carrillo and Bruno Theodoro Luciano review the structures, processes, and outcomes of civil society participation in regional governance in three representative regional projects—the Andean Community, The Southern Common Market, and the Central American Integration System. They argue that despite some differences in institutional design, with the Central American Integration System developing a supranational logic of membership in contrast to the intergovernmental settings of the other two cases, social participation in the three cases is limited to agenda facilitation, and its effects on regional decision-making is residual.

Tiago Soares Nogara examines the redefinition of the Common Southern Market during the rise of Latin America's pink tide, focusing on how debates over Venezuela's accession intersect with the broader context of post-neoliberal regionalism. He concludes that conflicts surrounding Venezuela's entry were pivotal in determining Mercosur's trajectory, revealing both the potential and the limits of post-neoliberal integration at that time.

Santiago Albuja argues that international organizations played a relevant role in designing the Human Development Bonus in Ecuador by imposing structural adjustment reforms, establishing the conditions for the delivery of loans, and offering technical assistance. Meanwhile, Mitchell Gallagher analyzes the Taiwan–Paraguay diplomatic bond through constructivism centering norms, identities, and intersubjectivities. He argues that Taiwan and Paraguay's fidelity flows from a bedrock commitment to ideals of liberal democracy, self-determination, and human rights.

Milva Geri, Fernanda Villarreal, and Nebel Moscoso explore the determinants of contribution density to the Argentine pension system using administrative data from 1996 to 2021. They conclude that the density of contributions is low and depends on the branch of economic activity, the jurisdiction where the company is located, the individual's income and gender, and the age of enrollment.

Finally, Armando Chaguaceda's opinion article gives insight into how the Cuban regime is now facing domestic and global challenges. His text examines the conceptual elements that explain the Cuban model, its changes and institutional continuities, and the emerging challenges of a mobilized citizenry that questions its legitimacy.

We hope our readers will enjoy the selected collection we prepared for the present volume.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Latin American Policy
Latin American Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Latin American Policy (LAP): A Journal of Politics and Governance in a Changing Region, a collaboration of the Policy Studies Organization and the Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Pública, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Santa Fe Campus, published its first issue in mid-2010. LAP’s primary focus is intended to be in the policy arena, and will focus on any issue or field involving authority and polities (although not necessarily clustered on governments), agency (either governmental or from the civil society, or both), and the pursuit/achievement of specific (or anticipated) outcomes. We invite authors to focus on any crosscutting issue situated in the interface between the policy and political domain concerning or affecting any Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) country or group of countries. This journal will remain open to multidisciplinary approaches dealing with policy issues and the political contexts in which they take place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信