虚拟交流作为一种远程国际化模式:土耳其的经验

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alper Çalıkoğlu, Betül Bulut-Sahin, Asuman Aşık
{"title":"虚拟交流作为一种远程国际化模式:土耳其的经验","authors":"Alper Çalıkoğlu,&nbsp;Betül Bulut-Sahin,&nbsp;Asuman Aşık","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This study examines virtual exchange (VE) as a mode of internationalization at a distance through the Turkish higher education context. Recognizing the constraints of geographical mobility, VE emerges as a viable alternative to enhance international and intercultural learning through technology. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, we interviewed 22 participants, including students, faculty members and international office professionals from five Turkish universities. Our findings reveal diverse motivations, such as personal and academic development, and highlight professional and intercultural affordances. However, significant challenges persist, including technological limitations, time and communication obstacles and institutional support deficiencies. Our study indicates that VE projects provide valuable international experiences and intercultural awareness for students unable to participate in geographical mobility, yet they require careful consideration of technological tools and planning of activities in the ‘third space’ to overcome existing barriers and enhance student engagement. We recommend that scholars and institutional leaders give more consideration to VE from the viewpoint of internationalization at a distance for more inclusive and equitable internationalization practices in higher education driven by technological tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Virtual exchange offers cost-effective solutions for international and intercultural exchanges, especially for students with limited opportunities for geographical mobility.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What does this paper add?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Examines the virtual exchange from the viewpoint of Internationalization at a distance, using the Turkish case.</li>\n \n <li>Uses the conceptual lens of space, place and time to understand virtual exchange and Internationalization at a distance and improve virtual exchange experiences in underprivileged contexts.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for policy and practice\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Instructors should foster a sense of community and belonging for virtual exchange participants and diversify technological tools and communication mechanisms.</li>\n \n <li>Institutions should prioritize virtual exchange and technology integration in internationalization, provide adequate resources for students and faculty members and incentivize virtual exchange.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 2","pages":"909-926"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13546","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual exchange as a mode of internationalization at a distance: Experiences from Türkiye\",\"authors\":\"Alper Çalıkoğlu,&nbsp;Betül Bulut-Sahin,&nbsp;Asuman Aşık\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjet.13546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>This study examines virtual exchange (VE) as a mode of internationalization at a distance through the Turkish higher education context. Recognizing the constraints of geographical mobility, VE emerges as a viable alternative to enhance international and intercultural learning through technology. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, we interviewed 22 participants, including students, faculty members and international office professionals from five Turkish universities. Our findings reveal diverse motivations, such as personal and academic development, and highlight professional and intercultural affordances. However, significant challenges persist, including technological limitations, time and communication obstacles and institutional support deficiencies. Our study indicates that VE projects provide valuable international experiences and intercultural awareness for students unable to participate in geographical mobility, yet they require careful consideration of technological tools and planning of activities in the ‘third space’ to overcome existing barriers and enhance student engagement. We recommend that scholars and institutional leaders give more consideration to VE from the viewpoint of internationalization at a distance for more inclusive and equitable internationalization practices in higher education driven by technological tools.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\\n <p>What is already known about this topic?\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Virtual exchange offers cost-effective solutions for international and intercultural exchanges, especially for students with limited opportunities for geographical mobility.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>What does this paper add?\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Examines the virtual exchange from the viewpoint of Internationalization at a distance, using the Turkish case.</li>\\n \\n <li>Uses the conceptual lens of space, place and time to understand virtual exchange and Internationalization at a distance and improve virtual exchange experiences in underprivileged contexts.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>Implications for policy and practice\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Instructors should foster a sense of community and belonging for virtual exchange participants and diversify technological tools and communication mechanisms.</li>\\n \\n <li>Institutions should prioritize virtual exchange and technology integration in internationalization, provide adequate resources for students and faculty members and incentivize virtual exchange.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"909-926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13546\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13546\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过土耳其高等教育背景,考察虚拟交换(VE)作为一种远程国际化模式。认识到地域流动性的限制,虚拟教学成为通过技术加强国际和跨文化学习的可行选择。采用定性现象学设计,我们采访了22名参与者,包括来自土耳其五所大学的学生、教师和国际办公室专业人员。我们的研究结果揭示了不同的动机,如个人和学术发展,并强调了专业和跨文化的启示。然而,重大挑战仍然存在,包括技术限制、时间和沟通障碍以及体制支助不足。我们的研究表明,VE项目为无法参与地理流动的学生提供了宝贵的国际经验和跨文化意识,但他们需要仔细考虑技术工具和“第三空间”活动的规划,以克服现有的障碍,提高学生的参与度。我们建议学者和机构领导更多地从远程国际化的角度考虑虚拟企业,在技术工具的推动下,在高等教育中实现更加包容和公平的国际化实践。关于这个主题我们已经知道了什么?虚拟交换为国际和跨文化交流提供了经济有效的解决方案,特别是对于地域流动机会有限的学生。这篇文章补充了什么?以土耳其为例,从国际化的视角透视虚拟交换。用空间、地点和时间的概念镜头,在一定距离上理解虚拟交换和国际化,改善弱势环境下的虚拟交换体验。对政策和实践的影响教员应培养虚拟交流参与者的社区意识和归属感,并使技术工具和交流机制多样化。学校应优先考虑国际化中的虚拟交流和技术整合,为学生和教师提供足够的资源,并鼓励虚拟交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual exchange as a mode of internationalization at a distance: Experiences from Türkiye

This study examines virtual exchange (VE) as a mode of internationalization at a distance through the Turkish higher education context. Recognizing the constraints of geographical mobility, VE emerges as a viable alternative to enhance international and intercultural learning through technology. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, we interviewed 22 participants, including students, faculty members and international office professionals from five Turkish universities. Our findings reveal diverse motivations, such as personal and academic development, and highlight professional and intercultural affordances. However, significant challenges persist, including technological limitations, time and communication obstacles and institutional support deficiencies. Our study indicates that VE projects provide valuable international experiences and intercultural awareness for students unable to participate in geographical mobility, yet they require careful consideration of technological tools and planning of activities in the ‘third space’ to overcome existing barriers and enhance student engagement. We recommend that scholars and institutional leaders give more consideration to VE from the viewpoint of internationalization at a distance for more inclusive and equitable internationalization practices in higher education driven by technological tools.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic?

  • Virtual exchange offers cost-effective solutions for international and intercultural exchanges, especially for students with limited opportunities for geographical mobility.

What does this paper add?

  • Examines the virtual exchange from the viewpoint of Internationalization at a distance, using the Turkish case.
  • Uses the conceptual lens of space, place and time to understand virtual exchange and Internationalization at a distance and improve virtual exchange experiences in underprivileged contexts.

Implications for policy and practice

  • Instructors should foster a sense of community and belonging for virtual exchange participants and diversify technological tools and communication mechanisms.
  • Institutions should prioritize virtual exchange and technology integration in internationalization, provide adequate resources for students and faculty members and incentivize virtual exchange.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信