提高法律写作技巧:在混合智力学习环境中形成性反馈的影响

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Florian Weber, Thiemo Wambsganss, Matthias Söllner
{"title":"提高法律写作技巧:在混合智力学习环境中形成性反馈的影响","authors":"Florian Weber,&nbsp;Thiemo Wambsganss,&nbsp;Matthias Söllner","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly influenced educational technologies, reshaping the teaching and learning landscape. However, the notion of fully automating the teaching process remains contentious. This paper explores the concept of hybrid intelligence (HI), which emphasizes the synergistic collaboration between AI and humans to optimize learning outcomes. Despite the potential of AI-enhanced learning systems, their application in a human-AI collaboration system often fails to meet anticipated standards, and there needs to be more empirical evidence showcasing their effectiveness. To address this gap, this study investigates whether formative feedback in an HI learning environment helps law students learn from their errors and write more structured and persuasive legal texts. We conducted a field experiment in a law course to analyse the impact of formative feedback on the exam results of 43 law students, as well as on the writer (students), the writing product and the writing process. In the control group, students received feedback conforming to the legal common practice, where they solved legal problems and subsequently received general feedback from a lecturer based on a sample solution. Students in the treatment group were provided with formative feedback that specifically targeted their individual errors, thereby stimulating internal cognitive processes within the students. Our investigation revealed that participants who were provided with formative feedback rooted in their errors within structured and persuasive legal writing outperformed the control group in producing qualitative, better legal text during an exam. Furthermore, the analysed qualitative student statements also suggest that formative feedback promotes students' self-efficacy and self-regulated learning. Our findings indicate that integrating formative feedback rooted in individual errors enhances students' legal writing skills. This underscores the hybrid nature of AI, empowering students to identify their errors and improve in a more self-regulated manner.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Collaboration between humans and AI in educational settings advances learning mutually, fostering a unified developmental process.</li>\n \n <li>Collaborative education models advocate leveraging human and AI strengths for adaptive learning.</li>\n \n <li>Despite abundant theoretical research, empirical studies in HI remain limited. This gap underscores the need for more evidence-based approaches in integrating AI into educational settings.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Field experiment investigating the impact of formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment based on the theory of learning from errors.</li>\n \n <li>Comparison of a traditional legal learning environment (lecturer teaching using sample solutions) versus formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment.</li>\n \n <li>Implementing formative machine learning-based feedback supports law students in producing more structured and persuasive legal texts, leading to enhanced exam performance and higher grades.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Our research contributes significantly to computer-based education by presenting empirical evidence of how formative writing feedback impacts students' legal knowledge and skills in educational settings. This underscores the importance of incorporating empirical data into the development of AI-based educational tools to ensure their effectiveness.</li>\n \n <li>By focusing on individual errors corrected by formative feedback, we contribute to the learning from errors literature stream. This perspective offers valuable insights into how such feedback can support students' writing and learning processes, filling a gap in empirical evidence.</li>\n \n <li>Our findings demonstrate the potential impact of ML-based learning systems, particularly in large-scale learning environments like legal mass lectures. Formative writing feedback emerges as a scalable and beneficial addition to traditional learning environments, triggering internal learning processes, fostering self-regulated learning and increasing self-efficacy among students.</li>\n \n <li>By demonstrating the effectiveness of formative feedback within the framework of HI, particularly in legal education, our research underscores the potential of combining human understanding with AI-supported feedback to enhance learning outcomes.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 2","pages":"650-677"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13529","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing legal writing skills: The impact of formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment\",\"authors\":\"Florian Weber,&nbsp;Thiemo Wambsganss,&nbsp;Matthias Söllner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjet.13529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n \\n <p>Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly influenced educational technologies, reshaping the teaching and learning landscape. However, the notion of fully automating the teaching process remains contentious. This paper explores the concept of hybrid intelligence (HI), which emphasizes the synergistic collaboration between AI and humans to optimize learning outcomes. Despite the potential of AI-enhanced learning systems, their application in a human-AI collaboration system often fails to meet anticipated standards, and there needs to be more empirical evidence showcasing their effectiveness. To address this gap, this study investigates whether formative feedback in an HI learning environment helps law students learn from their errors and write more structured and persuasive legal texts. We conducted a field experiment in a law course to analyse the impact of formative feedback on the exam results of 43 law students, as well as on the writer (students), the writing product and the writing process. In the control group, students received feedback conforming to the legal common practice, where they solved legal problems and subsequently received general feedback from a lecturer based on a sample solution. Students in the treatment group were provided with formative feedback that specifically targeted their individual errors, thereby stimulating internal cognitive processes within the students. Our investigation revealed that participants who were provided with formative feedback rooted in their errors within structured and persuasive legal writing outperformed the control group in producing qualitative, better legal text during an exam. Furthermore, the analysed qualitative student statements also suggest that formative feedback promotes students' self-efficacy and self-regulated learning. Our findings indicate that integrating formative feedback rooted in individual errors enhances students' legal writing skills. This underscores the hybrid nature of AI, empowering students to identify their errors and improve in a more self-regulated manner.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\\n <p>What is already known about this topic\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Collaboration between humans and AI in educational settings advances learning mutually, fostering a unified developmental process.</li>\\n \\n <li>Collaborative education models advocate leveraging human and AI strengths for adaptive learning.</li>\\n \\n <li>Despite abundant theoretical research, empirical studies in HI remain limited. This gap underscores the need for more evidence-based approaches in integrating AI into educational settings.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>What this paper adds\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Field experiment investigating the impact of formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment based on the theory of learning from errors.</li>\\n \\n <li>Comparison of a traditional legal learning environment (lecturer teaching using sample solutions) versus formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment.</li>\\n \\n <li>Implementing formative machine learning-based feedback supports law students in producing more structured and persuasive legal texts, leading to enhanced exam performance and higher grades.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Our research contributes significantly to computer-based education by presenting empirical evidence of how formative writing feedback impacts students' legal knowledge and skills in educational settings. This underscores the importance of incorporating empirical data into the development of AI-based educational tools to ensure their effectiveness.</li>\\n \\n <li>By focusing on individual errors corrected by formative feedback, we contribute to the learning from errors literature stream. This perspective offers valuable insights into how such feedback can support students' writing and learning processes, filling a gap in empirical evidence.</li>\\n \\n <li>Our findings demonstrate the potential impact of ML-based learning systems, particularly in large-scale learning environments like legal mass lectures. Formative writing feedback emerges as a scalable and beneficial addition to traditional learning environments, triggering internal learning processes, fostering self-regulated learning and increasing self-efficacy among students.</li>\\n \\n <li>By demonstrating the effectiveness of formative feedback within the framework of HI, particularly in legal education, our research underscores the potential of combining human understanding with AI-supported feedback to enhance learning outcomes.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"650-677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13529\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13529\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)的最新发展对教育技术产生了重大影响,重塑了教学和学习的格局。然而,完全自动化教学过程的概念仍然存在争议。本文探讨了混合智能(hybrid intelligence, HI)的概念,它强调人工智能与人类之间的协同协作,以优化学习成果。尽管人工智能增强的学习系统具有潜力,但它们在人类-人工智能协作系统中的应用往往不能达到预期的标准,需要更多的经验证据来证明它们的有效性。为了解决这一差距,本研究调查了HI学习环境中的形成性反馈是否有助于法律学生从错误中吸取教训,并写出更有结构和说服力的法律文本。我们在一门法律课程中进行了实地实验,分析了形成性反馈对43名法律学生考试成绩的影响,以及对作者(学生)、写作产品和写作过程的影响。在对照组中,学生们得到的反馈符合法律惯例,在那里他们解决了法律问题,随后从讲师那里得到了基于样本解决方案的一般反馈。治疗组的学生获得了专门针对他们个人错误的形成性反馈,从而刺激了学生的内部认知过程。我们的调查显示,那些在结构化和有说服力的法律写作中犯错误的参与者在考试中写出定性的、更好的法律文本方面表现得比对照组要好。此外,分析的定性学生陈述也表明形成性反馈促进了学生的自我效能感和自我调节学习。我们的研究结果表明,整合根植于个人错误的形成性反馈可以提高学生的法律写作技能。这强调了人工智能的混合性质,使学生能够识别自己的错误,并以更自律的方式进行改进。从业者指出,关于这个话题,我们已经知道,在教育环境中,人类和人工智能之间的合作促进了相互学习,促进了统一的发展过程。协作教育模式提倡利用人类和人工智能的优势进行适应性学习。尽管有大量的理论研究,但对HI的实证研究仍然有限。这一差距凸显了在将人工智能纳入教育环境方面需要采取更多循证方法。本文增加的内容是基于从错误中学习理论的实地实验研究了形成性反馈在混合智能学习环境中的影响。传统法律学习环境(讲师使用示例解决方案进行教学)与混合智能学习环境中形成性反馈的比较。实施基于形成性机器学习的反馈支持法律学生编写更有结构和更有说服力的法律文本,从而提高考试成绩和分数。对实践和/或政策的启示我们的研究通过提供经验证据来证明形成性写作反馈如何影响学生在教育环境中的法律知识和技能,从而对基于计算机的教育做出了重大贡献。这强调了将经验数据纳入基于人工智能的教育工具开发以确保其有效性的重要性。通过关注通过形成性反馈纠正的个人错误,我们有助于从错误文学流中学习。这一观点为这些反馈如何支持学生的写作和学习过程提供了有价值的见解,填补了经验证据的空白。我们的研究结果证明了基于ml的学习系统的潜在影响,特别是在像法律大众讲座这样的大规模学习环境中。形成性写作反馈是对传统学习环境的一种可扩展的有益补充,它触发了内部学习过程,促进了自我调节学习,提高了学生的自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhancing legal writing skills: The impact of formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment

Enhancing legal writing skills: The impact of formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment

Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly influenced educational technologies, reshaping the teaching and learning landscape. However, the notion of fully automating the teaching process remains contentious. This paper explores the concept of hybrid intelligence (HI), which emphasizes the synergistic collaboration between AI and humans to optimize learning outcomes. Despite the potential of AI-enhanced learning systems, their application in a human-AI collaboration system often fails to meet anticipated standards, and there needs to be more empirical evidence showcasing their effectiveness. To address this gap, this study investigates whether formative feedback in an HI learning environment helps law students learn from their errors and write more structured and persuasive legal texts. We conducted a field experiment in a law course to analyse the impact of formative feedback on the exam results of 43 law students, as well as on the writer (students), the writing product and the writing process. In the control group, students received feedback conforming to the legal common practice, where they solved legal problems and subsequently received general feedback from a lecturer based on a sample solution. Students in the treatment group were provided with formative feedback that specifically targeted their individual errors, thereby stimulating internal cognitive processes within the students. Our investigation revealed that participants who were provided with formative feedback rooted in their errors within structured and persuasive legal writing outperformed the control group in producing qualitative, better legal text during an exam. Furthermore, the analysed qualitative student statements also suggest that formative feedback promotes students' self-efficacy and self-regulated learning. Our findings indicate that integrating formative feedback rooted in individual errors enhances students' legal writing skills. This underscores the hybrid nature of AI, empowering students to identify their errors and improve in a more self-regulated manner.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • Collaboration between humans and AI in educational settings advances learning mutually, fostering a unified developmental process.
  • Collaborative education models advocate leveraging human and AI strengths for adaptive learning.
  • Despite abundant theoretical research, empirical studies in HI remain limited. This gap underscores the need for more evidence-based approaches in integrating AI into educational settings.

What this paper adds

  • Field experiment investigating the impact of formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment based on the theory of learning from errors.
  • Comparison of a traditional legal learning environment (lecturer teaching using sample solutions) versus formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment.
  • Implementing formative machine learning-based feedback supports law students in producing more structured and persuasive legal texts, leading to enhanced exam performance and higher grades.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Our research contributes significantly to computer-based education by presenting empirical evidence of how formative writing feedback impacts students' legal knowledge and skills in educational settings. This underscores the importance of incorporating empirical data into the development of AI-based educational tools to ensure their effectiveness.
  • By focusing on individual errors corrected by formative feedback, we contribute to the learning from errors literature stream. This perspective offers valuable insights into how such feedback can support students' writing and learning processes, filling a gap in empirical evidence.
  • Our findings demonstrate the potential impact of ML-based learning systems, particularly in large-scale learning environments like legal mass lectures. Formative writing feedback emerges as a scalable and beneficial addition to traditional learning environments, triggering internal learning processes, fostering self-regulated learning and increasing self-efficacy among students.
  • By demonstrating the effectiveness of formative feedback within the framework of HI, particularly in legal education, our research underscores the potential of combining human understanding with AI-supported feedback to enhance learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信