留学生生态的变迁:远程国际化与国外国际化之比较

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Daian Huang, Jenna Mittelmeier
{"title":"留学生生态的变迁:远程国际化与国外国际化之比较","authors":"Daian Huang,&nbsp;Jenna Mittelmeier","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>This research explores and compares the learning ecologies of international students studying through internationalisation at a distance (IaD) and internationalisation abroad (IA) by investigating their experiences of first year of master's study with a UK university. We do so by using our previously proposed Revised Ecological Systems Theory as a conceptual framework, which integrates the physical/virtual and home/host dimensions into Bronfenbrenner's traditional Ecological Systems Theory. Our findings identified the co-existence and fluid nature of the physical/virtual and home/host ecologies for both IaD and IA students. We argue that learning ecologies and their changes throughout the academic year were not fully distinct for IaD and IA students, but their experiences within them vary between these two groups. Compared with IA students, IaD students stayed in relatively stable physical environments, but they experienced challenges with developing interpersonal connections with peers and had more limited intercultural encounters with the institution's host culture. Our findings suggest the importance of considering the physical/virtual and home/host dimensions of students' learning ecologies, and we provide suggestions for both practice and future research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is currently known about this topic\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Supported by technologies, internationalisation at a distance (IaD) is an emerging category of internationalisation of higher education, broadening students' access to higher education across borders.</li>\n \n <li>Existing research has focused on students' experiences in short-term online collaborative projects, virtual exchanges and the use of technologies, and evidence shows certain benefits of internationalisation, such as developing intercultural competence, can be achieved online.</li>\n \n <li>Universities are developing and providing more programmes for international students, both online and in-person.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>A comparison of the perceived learning ecologies of online and in-person students taking degree programmes at a UK university.</li>\n \n <li>Empirical evidence of the co-existence of physical/virtual and home/host learning ecologies for both online and in-person international students.</li>\n \n <li>Addressing the importance and possibility of revising traditional Ecological Systems Theory as a framework to better fit the digital era.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>The comparison between online and in-person students can provide a more holistic understanding of the experiences of international students, identifying the specific factors impacting students' experiences for each group, and further developing a better understanding of internationalisation of higher education as a whole.</li>\n \n <li>Universities should consider what is beyond the virtual world when designing IaD programmes and supporting online students, purposefully integrating more practical, collaborative and cultural-related elements in the course design.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 2","pages":"779-798"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13549","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The changing ecologies of international students: Comparing internationalisation at a distance and internationalisation abroad\",\"authors\":\"Daian Huang,&nbsp;Jenna Mittelmeier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjet.13549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>This research explores and compares the learning ecologies of international students studying through internationalisation at a distance (IaD) and internationalisation abroad (IA) by investigating their experiences of first year of master's study with a UK university. We do so by using our previously proposed Revised Ecological Systems Theory as a conceptual framework, which integrates the physical/virtual and home/host dimensions into Bronfenbrenner's traditional Ecological Systems Theory. Our findings identified the co-existence and fluid nature of the physical/virtual and home/host ecologies for both IaD and IA students. We argue that learning ecologies and their changes throughout the academic year were not fully distinct for IaD and IA students, but their experiences within them vary between these two groups. Compared with IA students, IaD students stayed in relatively stable physical environments, but they experienced challenges with developing interpersonal connections with peers and had more limited intercultural encounters with the institution's host culture. Our findings suggest the importance of considering the physical/virtual and home/host dimensions of students' learning ecologies, and we provide suggestions for both practice and future research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\\n <p>What is currently known about this topic\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Supported by technologies, internationalisation at a distance (IaD) is an emerging category of internationalisation of higher education, broadening students' access to higher education across borders.</li>\\n \\n <li>Existing research has focused on students' experiences in short-term online collaborative projects, virtual exchanges and the use of technologies, and evidence shows certain benefits of internationalisation, such as developing intercultural competence, can be achieved online.</li>\\n \\n <li>Universities are developing and providing more programmes for international students, both online and in-person.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>What this paper adds\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>A comparison of the perceived learning ecologies of online and in-person students taking degree programmes at a UK university.</li>\\n \\n <li>Empirical evidence of the co-existence of physical/virtual and home/host learning ecologies for both online and in-person international students.</li>\\n \\n <li>Addressing the importance and possibility of revising traditional Ecological Systems Theory as a framework to better fit the digital era.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>The comparison between online and in-person students can provide a more holistic understanding of the experiences of international students, identifying the specific factors impacting students' experiences for each group, and further developing a better understanding of internationalisation of higher education as a whole.</li>\\n \\n <li>Universities should consider what is beyond the virtual world when designing IaD programmes and supporting online students, purposefully integrating more practical, collaborative and cultural-related elements in the course design.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"779-798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13549\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13549\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过调查国际学生在英国一所大学硕士学习第一年的经历,探讨并比较了远程国际化(IaD)和海外国际化(IA)国际学生的学习生态。我们使用之前提出的修正生态系统理论作为概念框架,将物理/虚拟和家庭/主机维度整合到布朗芬布伦纳的传统生态系统理论中。我们的研究结果确定了物理/虚拟和家庭/主机生态共存的流动性。我们认为,学习生态及其在整个学年中的变化对IaD和IA学生来说并不是完全不同的,但他们在其中的经历在这两个群体之间是不同的。与IA学生相比,IA学生生活在相对稳定的物理环境中,但他们在发展与同龄人的人际关系方面遇到了挑战,与机构的东道国文化的跨文化接触也更有限。我们的研究结果表明,考虑学生学习生态的物理/虚拟和家庭/主机维度的重要性,我们为实践和未来的研究提供了建议。就目前所知,在技术的支持下,远程国际化(IaD)是高等教育国际化的一个新兴类别,拓宽了学生接受跨境高等教育的机会。现有的研究集中在学生在短期在线合作项目、虚拟交流和技术使用方面的经验,有证据表明,国际化的某些好处,如培养跨文化能力,可以在网上实现。大学正在为国际学生开发和提供更多的在线和面对面的课程。对一所英国大学攻读学位课程的在线学生和面对面学生的感知学习生态进行了比较。在线和面对面国际学生的物理/虚拟和家庭/主机学习生态共存的经验证据。探讨修改传统生态系统理论框架以更好地适应数字时代的重要性和可能性。对实践和/或政策的影响在线学生和面对面学生之间的比较可以更全面地了解国际学生的经历,确定影响每个群体学生经历的具体因素,并进一步发展对高等教育整体国际化的更好理解。大学在设计网络教育课程和支持在线学生时,应该考虑虚拟世界之外的东西,有目的地在课程设计中融入更多实用、协作和文化相关的元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The changing ecologies of international students: Comparing internationalisation at a distance and internationalisation abroad

The changing ecologies of international students: Comparing internationalisation at a distance and internationalisation abroad

This research explores and compares the learning ecologies of international students studying through internationalisation at a distance (IaD) and internationalisation abroad (IA) by investigating their experiences of first year of master's study with a UK university. We do so by using our previously proposed Revised Ecological Systems Theory as a conceptual framework, which integrates the physical/virtual and home/host dimensions into Bronfenbrenner's traditional Ecological Systems Theory. Our findings identified the co-existence and fluid nature of the physical/virtual and home/host ecologies for both IaD and IA students. We argue that learning ecologies and their changes throughout the academic year were not fully distinct for IaD and IA students, but their experiences within them vary between these two groups. Compared with IA students, IaD students stayed in relatively stable physical environments, but they experienced challenges with developing interpersonal connections with peers and had more limited intercultural encounters with the institution's host culture. Our findings suggest the importance of considering the physical/virtual and home/host dimensions of students' learning ecologies, and we provide suggestions for both practice and future research.

Practitioner notes

What is currently known about this topic

  • Supported by technologies, internationalisation at a distance (IaD) is an emerging category of internationalisation of higher education, broadening students' access to higher education across borders.
  • Existing research has focused on students' experiences in short-term online collaborative projects, virtual exchanges and the use of technologies, and evidence shows certain benefits of internationalisation, such as developing intercultural competence, can be achieved online.
  • Universities are developing and providing more programmes for international students, both online and in-person.

What this paper adds

  • A comparison of the perceived learning ecologies of online and in-person students taking degree programmes at a UK university.
  • Empirical evidence of the co-existence of physical/virtual and home/host learning ecologies for both online and in-person international students.
  • Addressing the importance and possibility of revising traditional Ecological Systems Theory as a framework to better fit the digital era.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • The comparison between online and in-person students can provide a more holistic understanding of the experiences of international students, identifying the specific factors impacting students' experiences for each group, and further developing a better understanding of internationalisation of higher education as a whole.
  • Universities should consider what is beyond the virtual world when designing IaD programmes and supporting online students, purposefully integrating more practical, collaborative and cultural-related elements in the course design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信