因变量与研究设计对品牌联盟的影响:一项元分析

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Kevin E. Voss , Mayoor Mohan , Jin Ho Jung , Fernando R. Jiménez
{"title":"因变量与研究设计对品牌联盟的影响:一项元分析","authors":"Kevin E. Voss ,&nbsp;Mayoor Mohan ,&nbsp;Jin Ho Jung ,&nbsp;Fernando R. Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Researchers have observed that a brand ally positively impacts a focal brand. However, it’s unclear what the average size of this effect is and if this effect is consistent across dependent variables and research designs. This uncertainty can lead to misconceptions among scholars and practitioners regarding the findings from brand alliance studies. Through a meta-analysis, this study finds that the average size of the brand alliance effect is 0.244, indicating a significant brand ally influence on a focal brand. Additionally, the analysis reveals that fictional brands yield larger effect sizes regarding attitudes toward the brand alliance, whereas real brands exert a greater impact on attitudes toward the focal brand. Yet, the effect size is influenced by dependent variables and research design elements. These findings suggest that drawing direct equivalences of effect sizes across dependent variables might be misleading; guidelines are provided to help navigate such potential discrepancies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 115248"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of brand alliances across dependent variables and research designs: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kevin E. Voss ,&nbsp;Mayoor Mohan ,&nbsp;Jin Ho Jung ,&nbsp;Fernando R. Jiménez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Researchers have observed that a brand ally positively impacts a focal brand. However, it’s unclear what the average size of this effect is and if this effect is consistent across dependent variables and research designs. This uncertainty can lead to misconceptions among scholars and practitioners regarding the findings from brand alliance studies. Through a meta-analysis, this study finds that the average size of the brand alliance effect is 0.244, indicating a significant brand ally influence on a focal brand. Additionally, the analysis reveals that fictional brands yield larger effect sizes regarding attitudes toward the brand alliance, whereas real brands exert a greater impact on attitudes toward the focal brand. Yet, the effect size is influenced by dependent variables and research design elements. These findings suggest that drawing direct equivalences of effect sizes across dependent variables might be misleading; guidelines are provided to help navigate such potential discrepancies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000712\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000712","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员观察到,品牌盟友对焦点品牌有积极影响。然而,目前还不清楚这种影响的平均大小是多少,以及这种影响在因变量和研究设计中是否一致。这种不确定性可能导致学者和实践者对品牌联盟研究结果产生误解。通过meta分析,本研究发现品牌联盟效应的平均大小为0.244,表明品牌联盟对焦点品牌的影响显著。此外,分析还显示,虚构品牌对品牌联盟态度的影响更大,而真实品牌对焦点品牌态度的影响更大。然而,效应量受因变量和研究设计因素的影响。这些发现表明,在因变量之间绘制直接等效的效应大小可能会产生误导;提供了指导方针,以帮助导航这些潜在的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of brand alliances across dependent variables and research designs: A meta-analysis
Researchers have observed that a brand ally positively impacts a focal brand. However, it’s unclear what the average size of this effect is and if this effect is consistent across dependent variables and research designs. This uncertainty can lead to misconceptions among scholars and practitioners regarding the findings from brand alliance studies. Through a meta-analysis, this study finds that the average size of the brand alliance effect is 0.244, indicating a significant brand ally influence on a focal brand. Additionally, the analysis reveals that fictional brands yield larger effect sizes regarding attitudes toward the brand alliance, whereas real brands exert a greater impact on attitudes toward the focal brand. Yet, the effect size is influenced by dependent variables and research design elements. These findings suggest that drawing direct equivalences of effect sizes across dependent variables might be misleading; guidelines are provided to help navigate such potential discrepancies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信