比较少数民族建筑工人与管理人员对影响安全沟通因素的认知

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Sainan Lyu , Carol K.H. Hon , Albert P.C. Chan , Ran Gao , Martin Skitmore , Xin Hu
{"title":"比较少数民族建筑工人与管理人员对影响安全沟通因素的认知","authors":"Sainan Lyu ,&nbsp;Carol K.H. Hon ,&nbsp;Albert P.C. Chan ,&nbsp;Ran Gao ,&nbsp;Martin Skitmore ,&nbsp;Xin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction</em>: Communications is of great importance to the workplace health and safety. This study explores safety communication perceptions of ethnic minority construction workers (EMCWs) and managers to address the vulnerability of EMCWs and overcome communication barriers in ensuring their safety. <em>Method:</em> A questionnaire survey of 134 EMCWs and 95 management staff in the Hong Kong and Australian construction industries is analyzed by the mean score ranking technique, Kendall’s concordance test, Spearman’s rank correlation test, and the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. <em>Results:</em> The main finding is that “Adequacy of language ability of workers” is the most important factor for effective safety communication. EMCWs also prioritize “Personality characteristics of workers” and “Adequacy of workers’ construction experience” for understanding safety information. Management staff emphasize the importance of “Adequacy of time when communicating with workers” and the “Appropriateness of communication style of management” for effective communication. Significant differences exist between EMCWs and management staff, with EMCWs considering 23 out of 36 factors as more important, particularly regarding cultural sensitivity and workers’ understanding of the host country’s culture. <em>Conclusions:</em> A fresh perspective is provided on safety communication factors, revealing significant differences in perceptions between EMCWs and management staff, highlighting communication gaps requiring attention. The prevailing organizational-centric approach is challenged by emphasizing EMCWs’ prioritization of worker-related factors like language ability and personality traits, emphasizing the need to address worker-specific issues. Cultural sensitivity emerges as a significant factor, rated higher by EMCWs, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing cultural differences in communication. A research gap is filled by examining safety communication issues specific to EMCWs, providing insights for interventions and strategies to enhance safety practices and protect their well-being. <em>Practical Applications:</em> The research findings highlight the importance of addressing language barriers, considering personality traits and construction experience, allocating adequate communication time, and promoting cultural sensitivity in safety communication between EMCWs and management staff.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 511-521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the perceptions of ethnic minority construction workers and management staff on the factors affecting safety communications\",\"authors\":\"Sainan Lyu ,&nbsp;Carol K.H. Hon ,&nbsp;Albert P.C. Chan ,&nbsp;Ran Gao ,&nbsp;Martin Skitmore ,&nbsp;Xin Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Introduction</em>: Communications is of great importance to the workplace health and safety. This study explores safety communication perceptions of ethnic minority construction workers (EMCWs) and managers to address the vulnerability of EMCWs and overcome communication barriers in ensuring their safety. <em>Method:</em> A questionnaire survey of 134 EMCWs and 95 management staff in the Hong Kong and Australian construction industries is analyzed by the mean score ranking technique, Kendall’s concordance test, Spearman’s rank correlation test, and the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. <em>Results:</em> The main finding is that “Adequacy of language ability of workers” is the most important factor for effective safety communication. EMCWs also prioritize “Personality characteristics of workers” and “Adequacy of workers’ construction experience” for understanding safety information. Management staff emphasize the importance of “Adequacy of time when communicating with workers” and the “Appropriateness of communication style of management” for effective communication. Significant differences exist between EMCWs and management staff, with EMCWs considering 23 out of 36 factors as more important, particularly regarding cultural sensitivity and workers’ understanding of the host country’s culture. <em>Conclusions:</em> A fresh perspective is provided on safety communication factors, revealing significant differences in perceptions between EMCWs and management staff, highlighting communication gaps requiring attention. The prevailing organizational-centric approach is challenged by emphasizing EMCWs’ prioritization of worker-related factors like language ability and personality traits, emphasizing the need to address worker-specific issues. Cultural sensitivity emerges as a significant factor, rated higher by EMCWs, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing cultural differences in communication. A research gap is filled by examining safety communication issues specific to EMCWs, providing insights for interventions and strategies to enhance safety practices and protect their well-being. <em>Practical Applications:</em> The research findings highlight the importance of addressing language barriers, considering personality traits and construction experience, allocating adequate communication time, and promoting cultural sensitivity in safety communication between EMCWs and management staff.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 511-521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524002202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524002202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:沟通对工作场所的健康和安全非常重要。本研究旨在探讨少数民族建筑工人和管理人员的安全沟通认知,以解决少数民族建筑工人的脆弱性,克服沟通障碍,确保他们的安全。方法:采用均分排序法、Kendall’s一致性检验、Spearman’s秩相关检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对香港和澳大利亚建筑业134名EMCWs和95名管理人员进行问卷调查。结果:主要发现“工人的语言能力是否足够”是有效安全沟通的最重要因素。EMCWs亦优先考虑“工人的个性特征”和“工人的施工经验是否足够”,以了解安全信息。管理人员强调“与工人沟通的时间充足”和“管理沟通方式的适当性”对于有效沟通的重要性。emcw和管理人员之间存在显著差异,emcw认为36个因素中的23个因素更重要,特别是在文化敏感性和工人对东道国文化的理解方面。结论:本研究提供了安全沟通因素的新视角,揭示了EMCWs和管理人员在认知上的显著差异,突出了需要注意的沟通差距。主流的以组织为中心的方法受到了挑战,它强调EMCWs优先考虑与员工相关的因素,如语言能力和个性特征,强调需要解决员工特有的问题。文化敏感性是一个重要因素,在EMCWs中得到了更高的评价,强调了在沟通中认识和处理文化差异的重要性。通过研究EMCWs特有的安全沟通问题,填补了研究空白,为加强安全实践和保护其福祉的干预措施和策略提供了见解。实际应用:研究结果强调,在机电工程工人与管理人员进行安全沟通时,必须克服语言障碍、考虑性格特点和施工经验、分配足够的沟通时间,以及提高文化敏感度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the perceptions of ethnic minority construction workers and management staff on the factors affecting safety communications
Introduction: Communications is of great importance to the workplace health and safety. This study explores safety communication perceptions of ethnic minority construction workers (EMCWs) and managers to address the vulnerability of EMCWs and overcome communication barriers in ensuring their safety. Method: A questionnaire survey of 134 EMCWs and 95 management staff in the Hong Kong and Australian construction industries is analyzed by the mean score ranking technique, Kendall’s concordance test, Spearman’s rank correlation test, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The main finding is that “Adequacy of language ability of workers” is the most important factor for effective safety communication. EMCWs also prioritize “Personality characteristics of workers” and “Adequacy of workers’ construction experience” for understanding safety information. Management staff emphasize the importance of “Adequacy of time when communicating with workers” and the “Appropriateness of communication style of management” for effective communication. Significant differences exist between EMCWs and management staff, with EMCWs considering 23 out of 36 factors as more important, particularly regarding cultural sensitivity and workers’ understanding of the host country’s culture. Conclusions: A fresh perspective is provided on safety communication factors, revealing significant differences in perceptions between EMCWs and management staff, highlighting communication gaps requiring attention. The prevailing organizational-centric approach is challenged by emphasizing EMCWs’ prioritization of worker-related factors like language ability and personality traits, emphasizing the need to address worker-specific issues. Cultural sensitivity emerges as a significant factor, rated higher by EMCWs, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing cultural differences in communication. A research gap is filled by examining safety communication issues specific to EMCWs, providing insights for interventions and strategies to enhance safety practices and protect their well-being. Practical Applications: The research findings highlight the importance of addressing language barriers, considering personality traits and construction experience, allocating adequate communication time, and promoting cultural sensitivity in safety communication between EMCWs and management staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信