基于深度学习的沿海含水层海水入侵地下水抽取方案多目标优化

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dilip Kumar Roy , Bithin Datta
{"title":"基于深度学习的沿海含水层海水入侵地下水抽取方案多目标优化","authors":"Dilip Kumar Roy ,&nbsp;Bithin Datta","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efficient optimization of pumping systems is crucial for managing salinity intrusion and ensuring groundwater sustainability in coastal aquifers. Surrogate models (SMs) are widely used in aquifer management as efficient alternatives to complex groundwater simulations. This study develops and compares six deep learning (DL)-based SMs for an optimal groundwater pumping problem. These include Simple and Deep Feed Forward Neural Networks, and four Recurrent Neural Networks (Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bi-directional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), Projected Layer LSTM (pro-LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network). The best DL-based SM at different monitoring locations (MLs) provided accurate predictions with high accuracy and low error metrics. To solve the coupled simulation-optimization (S-O) problem, the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm with Controlled Elitism (CEMOGA) and Multiple Objective Feasibility Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization (MOFEPSO) were employed to derive Pareto-optimal groundwater abstractions. The precision of optimal pumping schedules derived from the best DL-based S-O approach was validated through the numerical model. Validation showed that MOFEPSO outperformed CEMOGA, with percentage relative error values ranging from 0 to 0.030% for CEMOGA and 0–0.025% for MOFEPSO. The best feasible bargaining solution from the Pareto front was selected using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods, considering trade-offs between two competing objectives. The Pareto-optimal solutions and the selected best compromise provide guidance for water resource managers in planning groundwater use. These findings offer valuable insights for sustainable water resource planning and are adaptable to various groundwater management challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 124592"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based surrogates for multi-objective optimization of the groundwater abstraction schemes to manage seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers\",\"authors\":\"Dilip Kumar Roy ,&nbsp;Bithin Datta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Efficient optimization of pumping systems is crucial for managing salinity intrusion and ensuring groundwater sustainability in coastal aquifers. Surrogate models (SMs) are widely used in aquifer management as efficient alternatives to complex groundwater simulations. This study develops and compares six deep learning (DL)-based SMs for an optimal groundwater pumping problem. These include Simple and Deep Feed Forward Neural Networks, and four Recurrent Neural Networks (Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bi-directional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), Projected Layer LSTM (pro-LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network). The best DL-based SM at different monitoring locations (MLs) provided accurate predictions with high accuracy and low error metrics. To solve the coupled simulation-optimization (S-O) problem, the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm with Controlled Elitism (CEMOGA) and Multiple Objective Feasibility Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization (MOFEPSO) were employed to derive Pareto-optimal groundwater abstractions. The precision of optimal pumping schedules derived from the best DL-based S-O approach was validated through the numerical model. Validation showed that MOFEPSO outperformed CEMOGA, with percentage relative error values ranging from 0 to 0.030% for CEMOGA and 0–0.025% for MOFEPSO. The best feasible bargaining solution from the Pareto front was selected using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods, considering trade-offs between two competing objectives. The Pareto-optimal solutions and the selected best compromise provide guidance for water resource managers in planning groundwater use. These findings offer valuable insights for sustainable water resource planning and are adaptable to various groundwater management challenges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 124592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725005687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725005687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效优化抽水系统对于控制盐度入侵和确保沿海含水层地下水的可持续性至关重要。替代模型(SMs)作为复杂地下水模拟的有效替代方法被广泛应用于含水层管理。本研究开发并比较了六种基于深度学习(DL)的SMs来解决最优地下水抽取问题。这些包括简单和深度前馈神经网络,以及四种循环神经网络(长短期记忆(LSTM),双向LSTM (Bi-LSTM),投影层LSTM (pro-LSTM)和门控循环单元神经网络)。最佳的基于dl的SM在不同的监测位置(ml)提供了准确的预测,具有高精度和低误差指标。为解决模拟-优化(S-O)耦合问题,采用控制精英的多目标遗传算法(CEMOGA)和多目标可行性增强粒子群算法(MOFEPSO)求解地下水抽取的Pareto-optimal问题。通过数值模型验证了基于最佳dl的S-O方法得到的最优抽油计划的精度。验证表明,MOFEPSO优于CEMOGA, CEMOGA的相对误差百分比为0 ~ 0.030%,MOFEPSO的相对误差百分比为0 ~ 0.025%。考虑两个竞争目标之间的权衡,采用简单加性加权法(SAW)和与理想解相似偏好排序法(TOPSIS)从Pareto前线选择最佳可行议价方案。帕累托最优解和选择的最佳折衷方案为水资源管理者规划地下水利用提供了指导。这些发现为可持续水资源规划提供了有价值的见解,并适用于各种地下水管理挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning-based surrogates for multi-objective optimization of the groundwater abstraction schemes to manage seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers
Efficient optimization of pumping systems is crucial for managing salinity intrusion and ensuring groundwater sustainability in coastal aquifers. Surrogate models (SMs) are widely used in aquifer management as efficient alternatives to complex groundwater simulations. This study develops and compares six deep learning (DL)-based SMs for an optimal groundwater pumping problem. These include Simple and Deep Feed Forward Neural Networks, and four Recurrent Neural Networks (Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bi-directional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), Projected Layer LSTM (pro-LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network). The best DL-based SM at different monitoring locations (MLs) provided accurate predictions with high accuracy and low error metrics. To solve the coupled simulation-optimization (S-O) problem, the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm with Controlled Elitism (CEMOGA) and Multiple Objective Feasibility Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization (MOFEPSO) were employed to derive Pareto-optimal groundwater abstractions. The precision of optimal pumping schedules derived from the best DL-based S-O approach was validated through the numerical model. Validation showed that MOFEPSO outperformed CEMOGA, with percentage relative error values ranging from 0 to 0.030% for CEMOGA and 0–0.025% for MOFEPSO. The best feasible bargaining solution from the Pareto front was selected using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods, considering trade-offs between two competing objectives. The Pareto-optimal solutions and the selected best compromise provide guidance for water resource managers in planning groundwater use. These findings offer valuable insights for sustainable water resource planning and are adaptable to various groundwater management challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信