能源三难困境平衡增长的动态政策路径探索:来自世界大型能源消费经济体的证据

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Masoud Shirazi
{"title":"能源三难困境平衡增长的动态政策路径探索:来自世界大型能源消费经济体的证据","authors":"Masoud Shirazi","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The balance scales of energy trilemma dimensions e.g., energy equity, energy security, and environmental sustainability, are changing, requiring a regime-switching with time-varying transition path forward. Accordingly, this research first studies how the trade-offs between energy trilemma dimensions are formed through different regimes in the twenty-five large energy consumers during 2004–2021. Then, the time-varying transition of the switching states in response to the hydrogen economy and geopolitical risks is investigated. To that end, a Markov-switching panel vector autoregressive method with time-varying transition is applied. Finally, this research assesses the performance of energy trilemma in response to a change in the pivotal policy instruments, using the generalized method of moments estimator. The regime-switching impulse-response analysis supports the short-term trade-offs between the dimensions under two regimes. Further, the development of the hydrogen economy increases the p-value of remaining in regime 1 as the dominant regime with the trade-offs; “upward”, “downward”, and “upward” states for the dimensions respectively, while the escalation of geopolitical risks declines the transition probability from regime 2 into regime 1. Finally, the existence of a causal and long-term relationship between energy trilemma and the policy instruments is assessed through the generalized method of moments. The policymakers should present the role of green transition, complexity, and geostrategy policies on nonlinear trade-offs between the dimensions is crucial for ensuring energy equity, maintaining energy security, and accelerating environmental sustainability and hence, a regime-switching balanced growth of energy trilemma. This vital structure is essential for inclusive, orderly, and just energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 115493"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic policy pathfinding for balanced growth of energy trilemma: Evidence from the world's large energy-consuming economies\",\"authors\":\"Masoud Shirazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The balance scales of energy trilemma dimensions e.g., energy equity, energy security, and environmental sustainability, are changing, requiring a regime-switching with time-varying transition path forward. Accordingly, this research first studies how the trade-offs between energy trilemma dimensions are formed through different regimes in the twenty-five large energy consumers during 2004–2021. Then, the time-varying transition of the switching states in response to the hydrogen economy and geopolitical risks is investigated. To that end, a Markov-switching panel vector autoregressive method with time-varying transition is applied. Finally, this research assesses the performance of energy trilemma in response to a change in the pivotal policy instruments, using the generalized method of moments estimator. The regime-switching impulse-response analysis supports the short-term trade-offs between the dimensions under two regimes. Further, the development of the hydrogen economy increases the p-value of remaining in regime 1 as the dominant regime with the trade-offs; “upward”, “downward”, and “upward” states for the dimensions respectively, while the escalation of geopolitical risks declines the transition probability from regime 2 into regime 1. Finally, the existence of a causal and long-term relationship between energy trilemma and the policy instruments is assessed through the generalized method of moments. The policymakers should present the role of green transition, complexity, and geostrategy policies on nonlinear trade-offs between the dimensions is crucial for ensuring energy equity, maintaining energy security, and accelerating environmental sustainability and hence, a regime-switching balanced growth of energy trilemma. This vital structure is essential for inclusive, orderly, and just energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001662\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源公平、能源安全和环境可持续性等能源三难维度的平衡尺度正在发生变化,需要一种具有时变过渡路径的制度转换。因此,本研究首先研究了2004-2021年期间25个大型能源消费者在不同制度下如何形成能源三难困境维度之间的权衡。然后,研究了氢经济和地缘政治风险下开关状态的时变转变。为此,采用时变过渡的马尔可夫切换面板向量自回归方法。最后,本研究利用广义矩估计方法评估了能源三难困境在应对关键政策工具变化时的表现。状态切换脉冲响应分析支持两种状态下维度之间的短期权衡。此外,氢经济的发展增加了以制度1为主导制度的p值;“向上”、“向下”和“向上”三个维度的状态,而地缘政治风险的升级降低了从制度2过渡到制度1的概率。最后,通过广义矩量法评估了能源三难困境与政策工具之间存在因果关系和长期关系。政策制定者应该展示绿色转型、复杂性和地缘战略政策在这些维度之间的非线性权衡中的作用,这对于确保能源公平、维护能源安全和加速环境可持续性至关重要,因此,这是能源三难困境的制度转换平衡增长。这一重要结构对于包容、有序、公正的能源转型至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dynamic policy pathfinding for balanced growth of energy trilemma: Evidence from the world's large energy-consuming economies

Dynamic policy pathfinding for balanced growth of energy trilemma: Evidence from the world's large energy-consuming economies
The balance scales of energy trilemma dimensions e.g., energy equity, energy security, and environmental sustainability, are changing, requiring a regime-switching with time-varying transition path forward. Accordingly, this research first studies how the trade-offs between energy trilemma dimensions are formed through different regimes in the twenty-five large energy consumers during 2004–2021. Then, the time-varying transition of the switching states in response to the hydrogen economy and geopolitical risks is investigated. To that end, a Markov-switching panel vector autoregressive method with time-varying transition is applied. Finally, this research assesses the performance of energy trilemma in response to a change in the pivotal policy instruments, using the generalized method of moments estimator. The regime-switching impulse-response analysis supports the short-term trade-offs between the dimensions under two regimes. Further, the development of the hydrogen economy increases the p-value of remaining in regime 1 as the dominant regime with the trade-offs; “upward”, “downward”, and “upward” states for the dimensions respectively, while the escalation of geopolitical risks declines the transition probability from regime 2 into regime 1. Finally, the existence of a causal and long-term relationship between energy trilemma and the policy instruments is assessed through the generalized method of moments. The policymakers should present the role of green transition, complexity, and geostrategy policies on nonlinear trade-offs between the dimensions is crucial for ensuring energy equity, maintaining energy security, and accelerating environmental sustainability and hence, a regime-switching balanced growth of energy trilemma. This vital structure is essential for inclusive, orderly, and just energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信