一种可重复填充的伤口内给药装置在羊开放性骨折感染生物膜受损模型中的体内疗效

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Dustin Williams , David Rothberg , Walker Kay , Lisa Nehring , Robert Falconer , Richard Tyler Epperson , Brooke Kawaguchi , Carolyn Ardizzone , Brian Barnum , Nicholas Ashton
{"title":"一种可重复填充的伤口内给药装置在羊开放性骨折感染生物膜受损模型中的体内疗效","authors":"Dustin Williams ,&nbsp;David Rothberg ,&nbsp;Walker Kay ,&nbsp;Lisa Nehring ,&nbsp;Robert Falconer ,&nbsp;Richard Tyler Epperson ,&nbsp;Brooke Kawaguchi ,&nbsp;Carolyn Ardizzone ,&nbsp;Brian Barnum ,&nbsp;Nicholas Ashton","doi":"10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Open fracture-related infection challenges persist in healthcare. From the time open fractures were defined ∼50 years ago, infection rates have gone essentially unchanged. Contributing factors include compromised vasculature, biofilm, and stalled innovations in treatment and prophylaxis. In this study, we engineered and tested the efficacy of a refillable drug delivery device, the Purgo Pouch (Pouch), that sustains local, high dose intrawound antibiotic concentrations in wound sites. We hypothesized that it would manage biofilm-compromised open fracture-related infection better than clinical standards of care. Therapies were tested in a unique sheep model of long bone open fracture-related infection with compromised tissue and biofilm inocula of methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. Sheep (n = 5/group) were treated with IV vancomycin (10 days), gentamicin-loaded CaSO<sub>4</sub> beads (single application), or the Pouch (10 days) loaded with gentamicin alone or a triple antibiotic combination. At 21 days, sheep were euthanized and microbiological and histological data collected. Results indicated that the Pouch managed infection more effectively, reducing bioburden to &lt;10<sup>5</sup> colony forming units (CFU)/sample, which was statistically significant compared to clinical standards, which failed to reduce bioburden to below 10<sup>5</sup> CFU. The hypothesis was supported. The Pouch received Breakthrough Device Designation by the FDA, is being transitioned toward clinical trials, and is a potential solution to the long-standing problem of open fracture-related infection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55844,"journal":{"name":"Biofilm","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo efficacy of a refillable intrawound drug delivery device in a sheep model of biofilm-compromised open fracture-related infection\",\"authors\":\"Dustin Williams ,&nbsp;David Rothberg ,&nbsp;Walker Kay ,&nbsp;Lisa Nehring ,&nbsp;Robert Falconer ,&nbsp;Richard Tyler Epperson ,&nbsp;Brooke Kawaguchi ,&nbsp;Carolyn Ardizzone ,&nbsp;Brian Barnum ,&nbsp;Nicholas Ashton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Open fracture-related infection challenges persist in healthcare. From the time open fractures were defined ∼50 years ago, infection rates have gone essentially unchanged. Contributing factors include compromised vasculature, biofilm, and stalled innovations in treatment and prophylaxis. In this study, we engineered and tested the efficacy of a refillable drug delivery device, the Purgo Pouch (Pouch), that sustains local, high dose intrawound antibiotic concentrations in wound sites. We hypothesized that it would manage biofilm-compromised open fracture-related infection better than clinical standards of care. Therapies were tested in a unique sheep model of long bone open fracture-related infection with compromised tissue and biofilm inocula of methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. Sheep (n = 5/group) were treated with IV vancomycin (10 days), gentamicin-loaded CaSO<sub>4</sub> beads (single application), or the Pouch (10 days) loaded with gentamicin alone or a triple antibiotic combination. At 21 days, sheep were euthanized and microbiological and histological data collected. Results indicated that the Pouch managed infection more effectively, reducing bioburden to &lt;10<sup>5</sup> colony forming units (CFU)/sample, which was statistically significant compared to clinical standards, which failed to reduce bioburden to below 10<sup>5</sup> CFU. The hypothesis was supported. The Pouch received Breakthrough Device Designation by the FDA, is being transitioned toward clinical trials, and is a potential solution to the long-standing problem of open fracture-related infection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biofilm\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biofilm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207525000103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207525000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放性骨折相关感染的挑战在医疗保健中持续存在。自50年前定义开放性骨折以来,感染率基本没有变化。影响因素包括脉管系统受损、生物膜受损以及治疗和预防方面的创新停滞不前。在这项研究中,我们设计并测试了一种可重复填充的药物输送装置Purgo药袋(药袋)的功效,该装置可在伤口部位维持局部高剂量的伤口内抗生素浓度。我们假设它能比临床护理标准更好地处理生物膜受损的开放性骨折相关感染。治疗方法在一种独特的长骨开放性骨折相关感染羊模型中进行了测试,该模型具有受损的组织和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的生物膜接种。绵羊(n = 5/组)分别接受静脉万古霉素(10天)、装载庆大霉素的CaSO4微球(单次施用)或单独或三联抗生素的药袋(10天)治疗。第21天,对绵羊实施安乐死,并收集微生物学和组织学数据。结果表明,眼袋更有效地控制了感染,将生物负荷降低到105菌落形成单位(CFU)/样本,与临床标准相比具有统计学意义,临床标准未能将生物负荷降低到105 CFU以下。这一假设得到了支持。该眼袋被FDA认定为突破性设备,目前正在向临床试验过渡,是长期存在的开放性骨折相关感染问题的潜在解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vivo efficacy of a refillable intrawound drug delivery device in a sheep model of biofilm-compromised open fracture-related infection
Open fracture-related infection challenges persist in healthcare. From the time open fractures were defined ∼50 years ago, infection rates have gone essentially unchanged. Contributing factors include compromised vasculature, biofilm, and stalled innovations in treatment and prophylaxis. In this study, we engineered and tested the efficacy of a refillable drug delivery device, the Purgo Pouch (Pouch), that sustains local, high dose intrawound antibiotic concentrations in wound sites. We hypothesized that it would manage biofilm-compromised open fracture-related infection better than clinical standards of care. Therapies were tested in a unique sheep model of long bone open fracture-related infection with compromised tissue and biofilm inocula of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sheep (n = 5/group) were treated with IV vancomycin (10 days), gentamicin-loaded CaSO4 beads (single application), or the Pouch (10 days) loaded with gentamicin alone or a triple antibiotic combination. At 21 days, sheep were euthanized and microbiological and histological data collected. Results indicated that the Pouch managed infection more effectively, reducing bioburden to <105 colony forming units (CFU)/sample, which was statistically significant compared to clinical standards, which failed to reduce bioburden to below 105 CFU. The hypothesis was supported. The Pouch received Breakthrough Device Designation by the FDA, is being transitioned toward clinical trials, and is a potential solution to the long-standing problem of open fracture-related infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biofilm
Biofilm MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信