CO2和障碍物对合成气爆炸行为联合影响的实验研究

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mingzhao Wang , Xiaoping Wen , Zhihan Yuan , Haoxin Deng , Jun Song , Guoyan Chen , Fahui Wang , Rongkun Pan
{"title":"CO2和障碍物对合成气爆炸行为联合影响的实验研究","authors":"Mingzhao Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Wen ,&nbsp;Zhihan Yuan ,&nbsp;Haoxin Deng ,&nbsp;Jun Song ,&nbsp;Guoyan Chen ,&nbsp;Fahui Wang ,&nbsp;Rongkun Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article experimentally investigates the explosion behaviors of syngas, focusing on the combined effects of obstacles and CO<sub>2</sub> on flame front evolution, flame front velocity (FFV), overpressure, and maximum overpressure (P<sub>max</sub>). Results demonstrate that CO<sub>2</sub> prolongs the flame propagation time, with increasing concentration delaying the onset time of the tulip flame (t<sub>tulip</sub>). A secondary tulip phenomenon is observed at α(H<sub>2</sub>) = 30 % and α(CO<sub>2</sub>) = 20 %. For pipes with obstacles, increasing CO<sub>2</sub> concentration reduces the impact of the obstacles on flame propagation, slows the flame front velocity, and causes the flame front to exhibit different shapes after passing through the obstacle. As α(H<sub>2</sub>) increases, the overpressure also rises substantially, with P<sub>max</sub> increasing up to 3.74 times compared to the scenario without obstacles. When α(CO<sub>2</sub>) reaches 15 %–20 %, the P<sub>max</sub> without obstacles surpasses that with obstacles, suggesting that at higher α(CO<sub>2</sub>), the obstacles have a minimal impact on the gas explosion, with α(CO<sub>2</sub>) becoming the dominant factor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of the combined effects of CO2 and obstacles on the explosive behavior of syngas\",\"authors\":\"Mingzhao Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Wen ,&nbsp;Zhihan Yuan ,&nbsp;Haoxin Deng ,&nbsp;Jun Song ,&nbsp;Guoyan Chen ,&nbsp;Fahui Wang ,&nbsp;Rongkun Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article experimentally investigates the explosion behaviors of syngas, focusing on the combined effects of obstacles and CO<sub>2</sub> on flame front evolution, flame front velocity (FFV), overpressure, and maximum overpressure (P<sub>max</sub>). Results demonstrate that CO<sub>2</sub> prolongs the flame propagation time, with increasing concentration delaying the onset time of the tulip flame (t<sub>tulip</sub>). A secondary tulip phenomenon is observed at α(H<sub>2</sub>) = 30 % and α(CO<sub>2</sub>) = 20 %. For pipes with obstacles, increasing CO<sub>2</sub> concentration reduces the impact of the obstacles on flame propagation, slows the flame front velocity, and causes the flame front to exhibit different shapes after passing through the obstacle. As α(H<sub>2</sub>) increases, the overpressure also rises substantially, with P<sub>max</sub> increasing up to 3.74 times compared to the scenario without obstacles. When α(CO<sub>2</sub>) reaches 15 %–20 %, the P<sub>max</sub> without obstacles surpasses that with obstacles, suggesting that at higher α(CO<sub>2</sub>), the obstacles have a minimal impact on the gas explosion, with α(CO<sub>2</sub>) becoming the dominant factor.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225000190\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225000190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对合成气的爆炸行为进行了实验研究,重点研究了障碍物和CO2对火焰锋面演变、火焰锋面速度(FFV)、超压和最大超压(Pmax)的联合影响。结果表明:CO2延长了火焰的传播时间,浓度的增加延迟了郁金香火焰(tutulip)的发生时间;在α(H2) = 30%和α(CO2) = 20%时,观察到二次郁金香现象。对于有障碍物的管道,增加CO2浓度会降低障碍物对火焰传播的影响,减慢火焰锋面速度,使火焰锋面穿过障碍物后呈现不同的形状。随着α(H2)的增加,超压也大幅增加,与无障碍物情况相比,Pmax增加了3.74倍。当α(CO2)浓度达到15% ~ 20%时,无障碍物的Pmax大于有障碍物的Pmax,说明在较高的α(CO2)浓度下,障碍物对瓦斯爆炸的影响最小,α(CO2)成为主导因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study of the combined effects of CO2 and obstacles on the explosive behavior of syngas
This article experimentally investigates the explosion behaviors of syngas, focusing on the combined effects of obstacles and CO2 on flame front evolution, flame front velocity (FFV), overpressure, and maximum overpressure (Pmax). Results demonstrate that CO2 prolongs the flame propagation time, with increasing concentration delaying the onset time of the tulip flame (ttulip). A secondary tulip phenomenon is observed at α(H2) = 30 % and α(CO2) = 20 %. For pipes with obstacles, increasing CO2 concentration reduces the impact of the obstacles on flame propagation, slows the flame front velocity, and causes the flame front to exhibit different shapes after passing through the obstacle. As α(H2) increases, the overpressure also rises substantially, with Pmax increasing up to 3.74 times compared to the scenario without obstacles. When α(CO2) reaches 15 %–20 %, the Pmax without obstacles surpasses that with obstacles, suggesting that at higher α(CO2), the obstacles have a minimal impact on the gas explosion, with α(CO2) becoming the dominant factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信