Weifeng Yu, Minghui Zhu, Zixu Yang* and Yi-Fan Han*,
{"title":"氧化铝相对CO2催化制烯烃铁催化剂结构演变的影响","authors":"Weifeng Yu, Minghui Zhu, Zixu Yang* and Yi-Fan Han*, ","doi":"10.1021/acscatal.4c0734010.1021/acscatal.4c07340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Alumina is extensively used as a catalyst support in a wide range of heterogeneous catalyst systems, where its phase structure significantly influences catalytic properties. Herein, Na-promoted Fe catalysts were impregnated on four different phases of alumina (<i>γ-</i>, <i>δ</i>-, <i>θ</i>-, and <i>α</i>-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) and evaluated for CO<sub>2</sub> hydrogenation to produce hydrocarbons. Among all the alumina tested, the α-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> supported Fe catalyst exhibited the best performance, achieving a selectivity of 47.4% for C<sub>2–4</sub> olefins at a CO<sub>2</sub> conversion of 42%, while remaining stable within 200 hour time on stream. As a comparison, the γ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> supported Fe catalyst produced mostly CH<sub>4</sub> and CO and deactivates rapidly. In situ characterizations, including Raman, XRD, FTIR, and TPD/TPSR were employed to explore the bulk/surface structural transformation of iron species and elucidate the reaction mechanisms. The distinct differences in catalytic properties are attributed to the variations in surface chemical properties and metal-support interactions, which exert significant influence on CO<sub>2</sub> activation, reduction, carburization, and the generation of FeC<sub><i>X</i></sub>. Notably, γ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, with its abundant surface hydroxyl groups, showed weak CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption while strong H<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity, leading to a more pronounced CH<sub>3</sub>O* signal than α-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. This observation suggests an enhanced generation of CH<sub>4</sub> intermediates and a higher hydrogen dissociation capacity, which promotes hydrogenation ability. This study clarifies the impact of the crystalline phases of alumina supports on the structure and composition of iron species and CO<sub>2</sub> hydrogenation activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9,"journal":{"name":"ACS Catalysis ","volume":"15 4","pages":"3428–3441 3428–3441"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Alumina Phases on the Structural Evolution of Iron Catalysts for the Catalytic Conversion of CO2 to Olefins\",\"authors\":\"Weifeng Yu, Minghui Zhu, Zixu Yang* and Yi-Fan Han*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acscatal.4c0734010.1021/acscatal.4c07340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Alumina is extensively used as a catalyst support in a wide range of heterogeneous catalyst systems, where its phase structure significantly influences catalytic properties. Herein, Na-promoted Fe catalysts were impregnated on four different phases of alumina (<i>γ-</i>, <i>δ</i>-, <i>θ</i>-, and <i>α</i>-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) and evaluated for CO<sub>2</sub> hydrogenation to produce hydrocarbons. Among all the alumina tested, the α-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> supported Fe catalyst exhibited the best performance, achieving a selectivity of 47.4% for C<sub>2–4</sub> olefins at a CO<sub>2</sub> conversion of 42%, while remaining stable within 200 hour time on stream. As a comparison, the γ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> supported Fe catalyst produced mostly CH<sub>4</sub> and CO and deactivates rapidly. In situ characterizations, including Raman, XRD, FTIR, and TPD/TPSR were employed to explore the bulk/surface structural transformation of iron species and elucidate the reaction mechanisms. The distinct differences in catalytic properties are attributed to the variations in surface chemical properties and metal-support interactions, which exert significant influence on CO<sub>2</sub> activation, reduction, carburization, and the generation of FeC<sub><i>X</i></sub>. Notably, γ-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, with its abundant surface hydroxyl groups, showed weak CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption while strong H<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity, leading to a more pronounced CH<sub>3</sub>O* signal than α-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. This observation suggests an enhanced generation of CH<sub>4</sub> intermediates and a higher hydrogen dissociation capacity, which promotes hydrogenation ability. This study clarifies the impact of the crystalline phases of alumina supports on the structure and composition of iron species and CO<sub>2</sub> hydrogenation activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Catalysis \",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"3428–3441 3428–3441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Catalysis \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.4c07340\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Catalysis ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.4c07340","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Alumina Phases on the Structural Evolution of Iron Catalysts for the Catalytic Conversion of CO2 to Olefins
Alumina is extensively used as a catalyst support in a wide range of heterogeneous catalyst systems, where its phase structure significantly influences catalytic properties. Herein, Na-promoted Fe catalysts were impregnated on four different phases of alumina (γ-, δ-, θ-, and α-Al2O3) and evaluated for CO2 hydrogenation to produce hydrocarbons. Among all the alumina tested, the α-Al2O3 supported Fe catalyst exhibited the best performance, achieving a selectivity of 47.4% for C2–4 olefins at a CO2 conversion of 42%, while remaining stable within 200 hour time on stream. As a comparison, the γ-Al2O3 supported Fe catalyst produced mostly CH4 and CO and deactivates rapidly. In situ characterizations, including Raman, XRD, FTIR, and TPD/TPSR were employed to explore the bulk/surface structural transformation of iron species and elucidate the reaction mechanisms. The distinct differences in catalytic properties are attributed to the variations in surface chemical properties and metal-support interactions, which exert significant influence on CO2 activation, reduction, carburization, and the generation of FeCX. Notably, γ-Al2O3, with its abundant surface hydroxyl groups, showed weak CO2 adsorption while strong H2 adsorption capacity, leading to a more pronounced CH3O* signal than α-Al2O3. This observation suggests an enhanced generation of CH4 intermediates and a higher hydrogen dissociation capacity, which promotes hydrogenation ability. This study clarifies the impact of the crystalline phases of alumina supports on the structure and composition of iron species and CO2 hydrogenation activity.
期刊介绍:
ACS Catalysis is an esteemed journal that publishes original research in the fields of heterogeneous catalysis, molecular catalysis, and biocatalysis. It offers broad coverage across diverse areas such as life sciences, organometallics and synthesis, photochemistry and electrochemistry, drug discovery and synthesis, materials science, environmental protection, polymer discovery and synthesis, and energy and fuels.
The scope of the journal is to showcase innovative work in various aspects of catalysis. This includes new reactions and novel synthetic approaches utilizing known catalysts, the discovery or modification of new catalysts, elucidation of catalytic mechanisms through cutting-edge investigations, practical enhancements of existing processes, as well as conceptual advances in the field. Contributions to ACS Catalysis can encompass both experimental and theoretical research focused on catalytic molecules, macromolecules, and materials that exhibit catalytic turnover.