浪漫化学通俗定义的内容分析

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alexandra Liepmann, Eric Tu, Amy Muise
{"title":"浪漫化学通俗定义的内容分析","authors":"Alexandra Liepmann,&nbsp;Eric Tu,&nbsp;Amy Muise","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03105-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although romantic chemistry is often referred to in popular culture in Western societies, usually to describe an intense connection between two people, it has received limited attention in academic research. One limitation in previous research and a barrier to future research is the lack of a comprehensive definition of romantic chemistry. In the current study (<i>N</i> = 200 single and partnered people [88 women, 110 men, 2 non-binary participants], age range = 21–76), we examined the common categories in laypeople’s definitions of romantic chemistry and assessed if people differed in how they described romantic chemistry based on demographic factors (i.e., gender, relationship status, relationship length, age, parental status). Two coders conducted a content analysis of participants’ open-ended definitions of romantic chemistry using an inductive coding strategy. We found that people described romantic chemistry using nine distinct categories (from most to least common): positive interaction, mutuality, comfort, compatibility, similarity, unexplainable spark, sexual attraction, intense fixation, and physiological response. Largely, participants did not differ in how they defined romantic chemistry based on demographic factors. Our findings provide a comprehensive description of romantic chemistry that can assist the development of a measure of romantic chemistry and ultimately test the role of perceived chemistry in relationship initiation and maintenance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"54 3","pages":"943 - 956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Content Analysis of Lay Definitions of Romantic Chemistry\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Liepmann,&nbsp;Eric Tu,&nbsp;Amy Muise\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10508-025-03105-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although romantic chemistry is often referred to in popular culture in Western societies, usually to describe an intense connection between two people, it has received limited attention in academic research. One limitation in previous research and a barrier to future research is the lack of a comprehensive definition of romantic chemistry. In the current study (<i>N</i> = 200 single and partnered people [88 women, 110 men, 2 non-binary participants], age range = 21–76), we examined the common categories in laypeople’s definitions of romantic chemistry and assessed if people differed in how they described romantic chemistry based on demographic factors (i.e., gender, relationship status, relationship length, age, parental status). Two coders conducted a content analysis of participants’ open-ended definitions of romantic chemistry using an inductive coding strategy. We found that people described romantic chemistry using nine distinct categories (from most to least common): positive interaction, mutuality, comfort, compatibility, similarity, unexplainable spark, sexual attraction, intense fixation, and physiological response. Largely, participants did not differ in how they defined romantic chemistry based on demographic factors. Our findings provide a comprehensive description of romantic chemistry that can assist the development of a measure of romantic chemistry and ultimately test the role of perceived chemistry in relationship initiation and maintenance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Sexual Behavior\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"943 - 956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Sexual Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03105-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03105-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然浪漫化学在西方社会的流行文化中经常被提及,通常用来描述两个人之间的紧密联系,但它在学术研究中受到的关注有限。以往研究的一个局限和未来研究的一个障碍是缺乏对浪漫化学的全面定义。在目前的研究中(N = 200名单身和有伴侣的人[88名女性,110名男性,2名非二元参与者],年龄范围= 21-76),我们检查了外行人对浪漫化学定义的常见类别,并评估了人们如何根据人口统计学因素(即性别,关系状态,关系长度,年龄,父母身份)来描述浪漫化学。两名编码员使用归纳编码策略对参与者对浪漫化学的开放式定义进行了内容分析。我们发现人们用九个不同的类别(从最常见到最不常见)来描述浪漫的化学反应:积极的互动、相互性、舒适、兼容性、相似性、无法解释的火花、性吸引力、强烈的固定和生理反应。在很大程度上,参与者对基于人口因素的浪漫化学的定义并没有什么不同。我们的研究结果提供了对浪漫化学的全面描述,可以帮助发展浪漫化学的测量,并最终测试感知化学在关系开始和维持中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Content Analysis of Lay Definitions of Romantic Chemistry

Although romantic chemistry is often referred to in popular culture in Western societies, usually to describe an intense connection between two people, it has received limited attention in academic research. One limitation in previous research and a barrier to future research is the lack of a comprehensive definition of romantic chemistry. In the current study (N = 200 single and partnered people [88 women, 110 men, 2 non-binary participants], age range = 21–76), we examined the common categories in laypeople’s definitions of romantic chemistry and assessed if people differed in how they described romantic chemistry based on demographic factors (i.e., gender, relationship status, relationship length, age, parental status). Two coders conducted a content analysis of participants’ open-ended definitions of romantic chemistry using an inductive coding strategy. We found that people described romantic chemistry using nine distinct categories (from most to least common): positive interaction, mutuality, comfort, compatibility, similarity, unexplainable spark, sexual attraction, intense fixation, and physiological response. Largely, participants did not differ in how they defined romantic chemistry based on demographic factors. Our findings provide a comprehensive description of romantic chemistry that can assist the development of a measure of romantic chemistry and ultimately test the role of perceived chemistry in relationship initiation and maintenance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信