{"title":"偶极子与对数周期天线衬垫屏蔽效能特性的FDTD仿真与实验比较研究","authors":"Pavithrakrishnan Radhakrishnan;Lirim Koraqi;Tim Claeys;Johan Catrysse;Davy Pissoort","doi":"10.1109/TEMC.2025.3531946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a comparative analysis of the characterization of the shielding effectiveness of gaskets using either a tuned dipole antenna (IEEE Std. 299) or a log-periodic antenna (MIL DTL 83528 G), following the specifications outlined in the relevant standards. Our study integrates both 3-D full-wave simulations using the finite-difference-time-domain solver and experimental validation within the frequency range of 200 MHz–1 GHz. In the simulations, near-field sensors representing external antennas were utilized to assess the gasket's shielding performance at various angles and locations. Additionally, the simulations explored the variability in shielding effectiveness when employing both antennas. For the experimental set-up, only the impinging angle of 0<inline-formula><tex-math>$^{\\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula> was considered to calculate the gasket's shielding effectiveness. The study demonstrates a good level of correlation between numerical simulations and experimental validation, revealing that tuned dipole and log-periodic antennas exhibit similar behaviors in terms of shielding effectiveness. Finally, the article emphasizes that despite the recommendation in the IEEE Std. 299 to use tuned dipole antennas, log-periodic antennas can be equivalently utilized due to their ease of use and practical perspective.","PeriodicalId":55012,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"67 2","pages":"598-608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDTD Simulation and Experimental Comparative Study of a Gasket's Shielding Effectiveness Characterization: Dipole Vs. Log-Periodic Antenna\",\"authors\":\"Pavithrakrishnan Radhakrishnan;Lirim Koraqi;Tim Claeys;Johan Catrysse;Davy Pissoort\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEMC.2025.3531946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a comparative analysis of the characterization of the shielding effectiveness of gaskets using either a tuned dipole antenna (IEEE Std. 299) or a log-periodic antenna (MIL DTL 83528 G), following the specifications outlined in the relevant standards. Our study integrates both 3-D full-wave simulations using the finite-difference-time-domain solver and experimental validation within the frequency range of 200 MHz–1 GHz. In the simulations, near-field sensors representing external antennas were utilized to assess the gasket's shielding performance at various angles and locations. Additionally, the simulations explored the variability in shielding effectiveness when employing both antennas. For the experimental set-up, only the impinging angle of 0<inline-formula><tex-math>$^{\\\\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula> was considered to calculate the gasket's shielding effectiveness. The study demonstrates a good level of correlation between numerical simulations and experimental validation, revealing that tuned dipole and log-periodic antennas exhibit similar behaviors in terms of shielding effectiveness. Finally, the article emphasizes that despite the recommendation in the IEEE Std. 299 to use tuned dipole antennas, log-periodic antennas can be equivalently utilized due to their ease of use and practical perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"598-608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10896575/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10896575/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
FDTD Simulation and Experimental Comparative Study of a Gasket's Shielding Effectiveness Characterization: Dipole Vs. Log-Periodic Antenna
This article presents a comparative analysis of the characterization of the shielding effectiveness of gaskets using either a tuned dipole antenna (IEEE Std. 299) or a log-periodic antenna (MIL DTL 83528 G), following the specifications outlined in the relevant standards. Our study integrates both 3-D full-wave simulations using the finite-difference-time-domain solver and experimental validation within the frequency range of 200 MHz–1 GHz. In the simulations, near-field sensors representing external antennas were utilized to assess the gasket's shielding performance at various angles and locations. Additionally, the simulations explored the variability in shielding effectiveness when employing both antennas. For the experimental set-up, only the impinging angle of 0$^{\circ }$ was considered to calculate the gasket's shielding effectiveness. The study demonstrates a good level of correlation between numerical simulations and experimental validation, revealing that tuned dipole and log-periodic antennas exhibit similar behaviors in terms of shielding effectiveness. Finally, the article emphasizes that despite the recommendation in the IEEE Std. 299 to use tuned dipole antennas, log-periodic antennas can be equivalently utilized due to their ease of use and practical perspective.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility publishes original and significant contributions related to all disciplines of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and relevant methods to predict, assess and prevent electromagnetic interference (EMI) and increase device/product immunity. The scope of the publication includes, but is not limited to Electromagnetic Environments; Interference Control; EMC and EMI Modeling; High Power Electromagnetics; EMC Standards, Methods of EMC Measurements; Computational Electromagnetics and Signal and Power Integrity, as applied or directly related to Electromagnetic Compatibility problems; Transmission Lines; Electrostatic Discharge and Lightning Effects; EMC in Wireless and Optical Technologies; EMC in Printed Circuit Board and System Design.