静脉内再通术后急性髂股深静脉血栓的抗血栓治疗:一项单中心研究和文献综述

Nedaa Skeik, Rina Li, Ellen Cravero, Bjorn Engstrom, Jesse Manunga
{"title":"静脉内再通术后急性髂股深静脉血栓的抗血栓治疗:一项单中心研究和文献综述","authors":"Nedaa Skeik, Rina Li, Ellen Cravero, Bjorn Engstrom, Jesse Manunga","doi":"10.1177/02683555251321903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no consensus regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy following endovenous recanalization. We aim to assess the effectiveness of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or combination therapy to provide evidence-based recommendations for antithrombotic therapy following interventional procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Institutional Review Board approved, retrospective study of patients presented to our facility with iliofemoral venous thrombosis requiring thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy with or without venous angioplasty/stenting between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2023. Incidence of vein or stent patency, thrombosis, and bleeding were considered primary endpoints and were compared between patients on anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or combination therapies at each post-interventional surveillance, up to five visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort yielded 128 patients, including 116 adults and 12 minors. We identified a notable trend in the post-recanalization medical routines of patients: those initially prescribed combination therapy post-procedure eventually transitioned to either exclusive anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. The initial combination antithrombotic therapy was associated with trends towards higher vein patency (59% vs 47% with anticoagulant vs 25% antiplatelet, <i>p</i> = .3), less recurrent vein and stent thrombosis (46% vs 54% with anticoagulants vs 100% antiplatelet, <i>p</i> = .10), and overall low major bleeding complications (3.2% vs 6.8% anticoagulant, <i>p</i> = .5) at first follow-up compared to those on anticoagulant or antiplatelet regimens alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the optimal post-interventional antithrombotic therapy remains uncertain, combination therapy was associated with trends towards higher vein patency and lower recurrent thrombosis, with low overall major bleeding complications at the first follow-up visit following interventions. Future studies encompassing larger and more diverse populations are essential to corroborate the findings presented in this report and offer valuable insights for optimizing the management of patients with this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251321903"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antithrombotic therapies for patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis following endovenous recanalization: A single-center study and literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Nedaa Skeik, Rina Li, Ellen Cravero, Bjorn Engstrom, Jesse Manunga\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251321903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no consensus regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy following endovenous recanalization. We aim to assess the effectiveness of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or combination therapy to provide evidence-based recommendations for antithrombotic therapy following interventional procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Institutional Review Board approved, retrospective study of patients presented to our facility with iliofemoral venous thrombosis requiring thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy with or without venous angioplasty/stenting between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2023. Incidence of vein or stent patency, thrombosis, and bleeding were considered primary endpoints and were compared between patients on anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or combination therapies at each post-interventional surveillance, up to five visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort yielded 128 patients, including 116 adults and 12 minors. We identified a notable trend in the post-recanalization medical routines of patients: those initially prescribed combination therapy post-procedure eventually transitioned to either exclusive anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. The initial combination antithrombotic therapy was associated with trends towards higher vein patency (59% vs 47% with anticoagulant vs 25% antiplatelet, <i>p</i> = .3), less recurrent vein and stent thrombosis (46% vs 54% with anticoagulants vs 100% antiplatelet, <i>p</i> = .10), and overall low major bleeding complications (3.2% vs 6.8% anticoagulant, <i>p</i> = .5) at first follow-up compared to those on anticoagulant or antiplatelet regimens alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the optimal post-interventional antithrombotic therapy remains uncertain, combination therapy was associated with trends towards higher vein patency and lower recurrent thrombosis, with low overall major bleeding complications at the first follow-up visit following interventions. Future studies encompassing larger and more diverse populations are essential to corroborate the findings presented in this report and offer valuable insights for optimizing the management of patients with this condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251321903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251321903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251321903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于静脉内再通后的最佳抗血栓治疗尚无共识。我们的目的是评估抗凝、抗血小板或联合治疗的有效性,为介入治疗后的抗血栓治疗提供循证建议。方法:2010年1月1日至2023年4月1日期间,一项机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究纳入了髂股静脉血栓形成患者,需要溶栓和/或取栓,伴或不伴静脉血管成形术/支架植入。静脉或支架通畅、血栓形成和出血的发生率被认为是主要终点,并在每次介入后监测(最多5次)中比较使用抗凝、抗血小板或联合治疗的患者。结果:该队列共纳入128例患者,其中成人116例,未成年12例。我们发现在再通后患者的医疗常规中有一个显著的趋势:那些最初处方的联合治疗最终转变为抗凝或抗血小板治疗。与单独使用抗凝或抗血小板治疗方案的患者相比,初始联合抗血栓治疗具有更高的静脉通畅趋势(抗凝治疗组为59%,抗凝治疗组为47%,抗血小板治疗组为25%,p = 0.3),更少的静脉和支架血栓复发(抗凝治疗组为46%,抗凝治疗组为54%,抗血小板治疗组为100%,p = 0.10),以及总体低大出血并发症(抗凝治疗组为3.2%,抗凝治疗组为6.8%,p = 0.5)。结论:尽管最佳的介入后抗血栓治疗仍不确定,但联合治疗有提高静脉通畅和降低血栓复发的趋势,干预后第一次随访时总大出血并发症较低。未来的研究包括更大、更多样化的人群,对于证实本报告中的发现至关重要,并为优化这种疾病患者的管理提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antithrombotic therapies for patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis following endovenous recanalization: A single-center study and literature review.

Objectives: There is no consensus regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy following endovenous recanalization. We aim to assess the effectiveness of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or combination therapy to provide evidence-based recommendations for antithrombotic therapy following interventional procedures.

Methods: An Institutional Review Board approved, retrospective study of patients presented to our facility with iliofemoral venous thrombosis requiring thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy with or without venous angioplasty/stenting between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2023. Incidence of vein or stent patency, thrombosis, and bleeding were considered primary endpoints and were compared between patients on anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or combination therapies at each post-interventional surveillance, up to five visits.

Results: The cohort yielded 128 patients, including 116 adults and 12 minors. We identified a notable trend in the post-recanalization medical routines of patients: those initially prescribed combination therapy post-procedure eventually transitioned to either exclusive anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. The initial combination antithrombotic therapy was associated with trends towards higher vein patency (59% vs 47% with anticoagulant vs 25% antiplatelet, p = .3), less recurrent vein and stent thrombosis (46% vs 54% with anticoagulants vs 100% antiplatelet, p = .10), and overall low major bleeding complications (3.2% vs 6.8% anticoagulant, p = .5) at first follow-up compared to those on anticoagulant or antiplatelet regimens alone.

Conclusion: Although the optimal post-interventional antithrombotic therapy remains uncertain, combination therapy was associated with trends towards higher vein patency and lower recurrent thrombosis, with low overall major bleeding complications at the first follow-up visit following interventions. Future studies encompassing larger and more diverse populations are essential to corroborate the findings presented in this report and offer valuable insights for optimizing the management of patients with this condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信