探索将远程医疗纳入儿科专科姑息治疗的可行性。

Rebecca Toenne, Ursula Neuhaus, Maike Höcker, Annika Koch, Anke Menzel, Dirk Scharfe, Julia Geffron, Felix Reschke
{"title":"探索将远程医疗纳入儿科专科姑息治疗的可行性。","authors":"Rebecca Toenne, Ursula Neuhaus, Maike Höcker, Annika Koch, Anke Menzel, Dirk Scharfe, Julia Geffron, Felix Reschke","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specialised outpatient paediatric palliative care (SOPPC) is vital for young people with life-limiting conditions and telehealth integration might improve this care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evaluate the acceptance and challenges of implementing teleconsultations among SOPPC healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire, tailored to various professions in SOPPC, was developed. After pilot testing, it was distributed to all healthcare professionals in SOPPC in the county of Lower Saxony, Northern Germany. Statistical analyses, using descriptive methods, ensured the reliability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The survey involved 96 participants from SOPPC teams. Teleconsultations were perceived as time-saving (physicians (80%), nursing (68%), psychosocial varied), facilitating patient-centred discussions (physicians (87%), nursing staff (72%), psychosocial had varied responses) and maintaining intensive contact during restrictions (85% agreement). Improved team communication (91%) and patient-family communication (physicians (80%), nursing (68%), psychosocial (62%) were perceived benefits. Concerns included language barriers (84%) and technical readiness (80%). While physicians and nursing professionals saw telehealth enhancing patient safety (64-95%), psychosocial professionals were more skeptical (38-62%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights telehealth's potential in SOPPC, stressing the need for tailored strategies. While nursing staff and physicians generally accept telehealth, psychosocial professionals express reservations. Overcoming barriers like language and technical readiness is crucial for maximising telehealth benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"31 2","pages":"58-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the viability of telehealth integration into specialised paediatric palliative care.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Toenne, Ursula Neuhaus, Maike Höcker, Annika Koch, Anke Menzel, Dirk Scharfe, Julia Geffron, Felix Reschke\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specialised outpatient paediatric palliative care (SOPPC) is vital for young people with life-limiting conditions and telehealth integration might improve this care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evaluate the acceptance and challenges of implementing teleconsultations among SOPPC healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire, tailored to various professions in SOPPC, was developed. After pilot testing, it was distributed to all healthcare professionals in SOPPC in the county of Lower Saxony, Northern Germany. Statistical analyses, using descriptive methods, ensured the reliability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The survey involved 96 participants from SOPPC teams. Teleconsultations were perceived as time-saving (physicians (80%), nursing (68%), psychosocial varied), facilitating patient-centred discussions (physicians (87%), nursing staff (72%), psychosocial had varied responses) and maintaining intensive contact during restrictions (85% agreement). Improved team communication (91%) and patient-family communication (physicians (80%), nursing (68%), psychosocial (62%) were perceived benefits. Concerns included language barriers (84%) and technical readiness (80%). While physicians and nursing professionals saw telehealth enhancing patient safety (64-95%), psychosocial professionals were more skeptical (38-62%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights telehealth's potential in SOPPC, stressing the need for tailored strategies. While nursing staff and physicians generally accept telehealth, psychosocial professionals express reservations. Overcoming barriers like language and technical readiness is crucial for maximising telehealth benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of palliative nursing\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"58-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of palliative nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:评估儿科姑息关怀专科门诊医护人员对实施远程会诊的接受程度和面临的挑战:方法:针对南太地科委的不同专业编制了一份调查问卷。经过试点测试后,向德国北部下萨克森州的 SOPPC 所有医护人员发放了问卷。采用描述性方法进行的统计分析确保了调查结果的可靠性:来自 SOPPC 团队的 96 人参与了调查。远程会诊被认为节省时间(医生(80%)、护理人员(68%)、社会心理学家各不相同)、促进以患者为中心的讨论(医生(87%)、护理人员(72%)、社会心理学家的回答各不相同)以及在限制期间保持密切联系(85%同意)。改善团队沟通(91%)和病人与家人的沟通(医生(80%)、护理人员(68%)、社会心理工作者(62%))被认为是有益的。担心的问题包括语言障碍(84%)和技术准备(80%)。虽然医生和护理专业人员认为远程医疗能提高患者安全(64%-95%),但社会心理专业人员对此持怀疑态度(38%-62%):本研究强调了远程医疗在 SOPPC 中的潜力,同时也强调了量身定制策略的必要性。虽然护理人员和医生普遍接受远程保健,但社会心理专业人员却持保留意见。克服语言和技术准备等障碍对于最大限度地发挥远程医疗的优势至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the viability of telehealth integration into specialised paediatric palliative care.

Background: Specialised outpatient paediatric palliative care (SOPPC) is vital for young people with life-limiting conditions and telehealth integration might improve this care.

Aim: Evaluate the acceptance and challenges of implementing teleconsultations among SOPPC healthcare professionals.

Methods: A questionnaire, tailored to various professions in SOPPC, was developed. After pilot testing, it was distributed to all healthcare professionals in SOPPC in the county of Lower Saxony, Northern Germany. Statistical analyses, using descriptive methods, ensured the reliability of the findings.

Findings: The survey involved 96 participants from SOPPC teams. Teleconsultations were perceived as time-saving (physicians (80%), nursing (68%), psychosocial varied), facilitating patient-centred discussions (physicians (87%), nursing staff (72%), psychosocial had varied responses) and maintaining intensive contact during restrictions (85% agreement). Improved team communication (91%) and patient-family communication (physicians (80%), nursing (68%), psychosocial (62%) were perceived benefits. Concerns included language barriers (84%) and technical readiness (80%). While physicians and nursing professionals saw telehealth enhancing patient safety (64-95%), psychosocial professionals were more skeptical (38-62%).

Conclusion: This study highlights telehealth's potential in SOPPC, stressing the need for tailored strategies. While nursing staff and physicians generally accept telehealth, psychosocial professionals express reservations. Overcoming barriers like language and technical readiness is crucial for maximising telehealth benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信