对坦桑尼亚成人姑息治疗的可接受性和可及性的文化信仰影响的修改系统审查。

Amelia Breese, Maria Clark, Lesley Halliday
{"title":"对坦桑尼亚成人姑息治疗的可接受性和可及性的文化信仰影响的修改系统审查。","authors":"Amelia Breese, Maria Clark, Lesley Halliday","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) is recognised by the United Nations as a crucial element of universal health coverage. This article explores the cultural beliefs around the acceptability and accessibility of PC in Tanzania, East Africa.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide insight into barriers for the provision of culturally safe PC in this region.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative studies researching adult perspectives on PC in Tanzania between 2010 and 2022 were critically appraised.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 153 studies identified in the initial search, seven met the inclusion criteria. Four key themes were identified: acceptability of PC for recipients; acceptability of PC for providers; accessibility of PC for recipients and accessibility of PC for providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cultural beliefs around the acceptability of PC included shared values for individuals at the end of life and challenges around breaking bad news. Barriers to the accessibility of PC included training opportunities and opioid availability. Further research prioritising 'cultural safety' is necessary to improve PC provision in Tanzania.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"31 2","pages":"68-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified systematic review of the impact of cultural beliefs on the acceptability and accessibility of adult palliative care in Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Breese, Maria Clark, Lesley Halliday\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) is recognised by the United Nations as a crucial element of universal health coverage. This article explores the cultural beliefs around the acceptability and accessibility of PC in Tanzania, East Africa.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide insight into barriers for the provision of culturally safe PC in this region.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative studies researching adult perspectives on PC in Tanzania between 2010 and 2022 were critically appraised.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 153 studies identified in the initial search, seven met the inclusion criteria. Four key themes were identified: acceptability of PC for recipients; acceptability of PC for providers; accessibility of PC for recipients and accessibility of PC for providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cultural beliefs around the acceptability of PC included shared values for individuals at the end of life and challenges around breaking bad news. Barriers to the accessibility of PC included training opportunities and opioid availability. Further research prioritising 'cultural safety' is necessary to improve PC provision in Tanzania.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of palliative nursing\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"68-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of palliative nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2025.31.2.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:姑息治疗被联合国确认为全民健康覆盖的一个关键要素。这篇文章探讨了文化信仰周围的可接受性和可及性PC在坦桑尼亚,东非。目的:为该地区提供文化安全PC的障碍提供见解。方法:对2010 - 2022年坦桑尼亚成人视角的定性研究进行批判性评价。结果:在最初的检索中发现的153项研究中,有7项符合纳入标准。确定了四个关键主题:收件人可接受个人电脑;供应商PC的可接受性;接收方的PC可访问性和提供方的PC可访问性。结论:关于PC可接受性的文化信仰包括对生命结束时个人的共同价值观和打破坏消息的挑战。获得个人电脑的障碍包括培训机会和阿片类药物的可得性。进一步研究优先考虑“文化安全”是改善坦桑尼亚个人电脑供应的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A modified systematic review of the impact of cultural beliefs on the acceptability and accessibility of adult palliative care in Tanzania.

Background: Palliative care (PC) is recognised by the United Nations as a crucial element of universal health coverage. This article explores the cultural beliefs around the acceptability and accessibility of PC in Tanzania, East Africa.

Aim: To provide insight into barriers for the provision of culturally safe PC in this region.

Method: Qualitative studies researching adult perspectives on PC in Tanzania between 2010 and 2022 were critically appraised.

Findings: Of 153 studies identified in the initial search, seven met the inclusion criteria. Four key themes were identified: acceptability of PC for recipients; acceptability of PC for providers; accessibility of PC for recipients and accessibility of PC for providers.

Conclusion: Cultural beliefs around the acceptability of PC included shared values for individuals at the end of life and challenges around breaking bad news. Barriers to the accessibility of PC included training opportunities and opioid availability. Further research prioritising 'cultural safety' is necessary to improve PC provision in Tanzania.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信