隐形眼镜消毒液对与镜片病例相关的角膜浸润事件相关的革兰氏阴性菌的杀灭效果

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S477777
Jennifer Corwin-Buell, Denise Callahan, Deborah McGrath, Kimberly Millard, Gary Mosehauer, Marjorie J Rah, Nitasha Phatak
{"title":"隐形眼镜消毒液对与镜片病例相关的角膜浸润事件相关的革兰氏阴性菌的杀灭效果","authors":"Jennifer Corwin-Buell, Denise Callahan, Deborah McGrath, Kimberly Millard, Gary Mosehauer, Marjorie J Rah, Nitasha Phatak","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S477777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-purpose solutions (MPSs) are designed to clean, disinfect, and condition contact lenses (CLs) to reduce the risk of contact lens-related adverse events, such as corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) that are often associated with opportunistic bacteria from contaminated CLs or CL cases. This study evaluated the disinfection efficacies of six MPSs and one hydrogen peroxide solution (HPS) comparator against three lens case CIE-associated organisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The solutions in this study were evaluated against commonly isolated Gram-negative lens case CIE-associated organisms in the presence of organic soil, according to the International Organization for Standardization 14729 (ISO) stand-alone test protocol. Challenge organisms (<i>Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Delftia acidovorans</i> and <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>) were inoculated into the solutions in conical tubes (for MPS) or CL cases (for HPS), and plated for organism quantification after the manufacturer-recommended minimum soak times. Disinfection efficacy for each solution is presented as mean log reduction per organism and overall disinfection across three challenge organisms (post hoc analysis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stand-alone testing against the challenge organisms demonstrated that PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB-containing MPSs, as well as HPS were significantly superior versus MAPD/PQ-1-based MPSs (all p < 0.05). While there is no ISO criteria for reduction of CIE-associated organisms, all solutions containing PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB, as well as HPS, achieved greater than 3-log reductions (the primary criteria for ISO 14729 compendial bacterial organisms) for all challenge organisms. The three MAPD/PQ-1-containing MPSs achieved between 0.6 and 1.7 log reduction across the MPS/test organism combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAPB, PHMB, and Alexidine-based MPSs demonstrated significantly greater disinfection efficacy than MAPD-based MPSs, and comparable disinfection efficacy to HPS, against commonly isolated Gram-negative CL case CIE-associated organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"519-526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biocidal Efficacies of Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions Against Gram-Negative Organisms Associated with Lens Case-Associated Corneal Infiltrative Events.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Corwin-Buell, Denise Callahan, Deborah McGrath, Kimberly Millard, Gary Mosehauer, Marjorie J Rah, Nitasha Phatak\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S477777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-purpose solutions (MPSs) are designed to clean, disinfect, and condition contact lenses (CLs) to reduce the risk of contact lens-related adverse events, such as corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) that are often associated with opportunistic bacteria from contaminated CLs or CL cases. This study evaluated the disinfection efficacies of six MPSs and one hydrogen peroxide solution (HPS) comparator against three lens case CIE-associated organisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The solutions in this study were evaluated against commonly isolated Gram-negative lens case CIE-associated organisms in the presence of organic soil, according to the International Organization for Standardization 14729 (ISO) stand-alone test protocol. Challenge organisms (<i>Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Delftia acidovorans</i> and <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>) were inoculated into the solutions in conical tubes (for MPS) or CL cases (for HPS), and plated for organism quantification after the manufacturer-recommended minimum soak times. Disinfection efficacy for each solution is presented as mean log reduction per organism and overall disinfection across three challenge organisms (post hoc analysis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stand-alone testing against the challenge organisms demonstrated that PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB-containing MPSs, as well as HPS were significantly superior versus MAPD/PQ-1-based MPSs (all p < 0.05). While there is no ISO criteria for reduction of CIE-associated organisms, all solutions containing PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB, as well as HPS, achieved greater than 3-log reductions (the primary criteria for ISO 14729 compendial bacterial organisms) for all challenge organisms. The three MAPD/PQ-1-containing MPSs achieved between 0.6 and 1.7 log reduction across the MPS/test organism combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAPB, PHMB, and Alexidine-based MPSs demonstrated significantly greater disinfection efficacy than MAPD-based MPSs, and comparable disinfection efficacy to HPS, against commonly isolated Gram-negative CL case CIE-associated organisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"519-526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834654/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S477777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S477777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多用途溶液(mps)被设计用于清洁、消毒和保养隐形眼镜(CLs),以降低隐形眼镜相关不良事件的风险,例如角膜浸润事件(CIEs),这通常与来自被污染的CLs或CL病例的机会性细菌有关。本研究评估了六种mps和一种过氧化氢溶液(HPS)比较剂对三种透镜病例cie相关生物的消毒效果。方法:根据国际标准化组织14729 (ISO)独立测试方案,本研究中的溶液在有机土壤中对常见分离的革兰氏阴性透镜体病例cie相关生物进行评估。挑战菌(xylosoxidans无色杆菌,Delftia acidovorans和嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌)接种于锥形管(MPS)或CL病例(HPS)的溶液中,并在制造商推荐的最小浸泡时间后镀上微生物定量。每种解决方案的消毒效果表示为每个生物体的平均对数减少和三个挑战生物体的总体消毒(事后分析)。结果:针对攻毒生物的独立测试表明,含有PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1、Alexidine/PQ-1和phmb的mps以及HPS显著优于基于MAPD/PQ-1的mps(均p < 0.05)。虽然没有减少与ie相关的生物的ISO标准,但所有含有PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1和PHMB以及HPS的溶液对所有挑战生物的减少都大于3对数(ISO 14729药典细菌生物的主要标准)。三种含有MAPD/ pq -1的MPS在MPS/测试生物组合中实现了0.6至1.7 log的降低。结论:基于PAPB、PHMB和alexadide的mps对常见的革兰氏阴性CL病例cie相关微生物的消毒效果明显优于基于mapd的mps,与HPS相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biocidal Efficacies of Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions Against Gram-Negative Organisms Associated with Lens Case-Associated Corneal Infiltrative Events.

Background: Multi-purpose solutions (MPSs) are designed to clean, disinfect, and condition contact lenses (CLs) to reduce the risk of contact lens-related adverse events, such as corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) that are often associated with opportunistic bacteria from contaminated CLs or CL cases. This study evaluated the disinfection efficacies of six MPSs and one hydrogen peroxide solution (HPS) comparator against three lens case CIE-associated organisms.

Methods: The solutions in this study were evaluated against commonly isolated Gram-negative lens case CIE-associated organisms in the presence of organic soil, according to the International Organization for Standardization 14729 (ISO) stand-alone test protocol. Challenge organisms (Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Delftia acidovorans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) were inoculated into the solutions in conical tubes (for MPS) or CL cases (for HPS), and plated for organism quantification after the manufacturer-recommended minimum soak times. Disinfection efficacy for each solution is presented as mean log reduction per organism and overall disinfection across three challenge organisms (post hoc analysis).

Results: Stand-alone testing against the challenge organisms demonstrated that PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB-containing MPSs, as well as HPS were significantly superior versus MAPD/PQ-1-based MPSs (all p < 0.05). While there is no ISO criteria for reduction of CIE-associated organisms, all solutions containing PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB, as well as HPS, achieved greater than 3-log reductions (the primary criteria for ISO 14729 compendial bacterial organisms) for all challenge organisms. The three MAPD/PQ-1-containing MPSs achieved between 0.6 and 1.7 log reduction across the MPS/test organism combinations.

Conclusion: The PAPB, PHMB, and Alexidine-based MPSs demonstrated significantly greater disinfection efficacy than MAPD-based MPSs, and comparable disinfection efficacy to HPS, against commonly isolated Gram-negative CL case CIE-associated organisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信