有或没有牛呼吸道疾病临床症状的奶牛的鼻腔病原体丰度没有差异。

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Ruth Eunice Centeno-Delphia, Erica A Long, Audrey C Ellis, Sarah Hofmann, Kara Mosier, Noelmi Ulloa, Johnnie Junior Cheng, Andrew Richards, Jacquelyn P Boerman, Jennifer Koziol, Mohit S Verma, Timothy A Johnson
{"title":"有或没有牛呼吸道疾病临床症状的奶牛的鼻腔病原体丰度没有差异。","authors":"Ruth Eunice Centeno-Delphia, Erica A Long, Audrey C Ellis, Sarah Hofmann, Kara Mosier, Noelmi Ulloa, Johnnie Junior Cheng, Andrew Richards, Jacquelyn P Boerman, Jennifer Koziol, Mohit S Verma, Timothy A Johnson","doi":"10.1186/s42523-025-00382-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) remains a significant health and economic problem to the dairy cattle industry. Multiple risk factors contribute to BRD susceptibility including the bacterial pathobionts Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis. Studies have characterized and quantified the abundance of these bacteria in the nasal cavity of cattle to infer and help disease diagnosis; nonetheless, there is still discrepancy in the results observed of when these microbes are commensal or pathogenic. Additionally, some of these studies are limited to a specific farm. The goal of this study is to compare the nasal microbiome community (diversity and composition) and the abundance of the four bacterial pathogens (by qPCR) in the nasal cavity to identify differences between dairy calves that are apparently healthy and those identified to have BRD. Nasal swabs were collected from approximately 50 apparently healthy and 50 BRD-affected calves sampled from five different dairy farms in the US (CA, IN, NY (two farms), and TX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calves diagnosed with BRD in NY, and TX had lower nasal microbiome diversity compared to the apparently healthy calves. Differences in the nasal microbiome composition were observed between the different farms predicted by Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac dissimilarities. Commensal and pathobiont genera Acinetobacter, Moraxella, Psychrobacter, Histophilus, Mannheimia, Mycoplasma, and Pasteurella were prevalent in the bovine nasal microbiome regardless of farm or disease status. The BRD-pathobiont H. somni was the most prevalent pathobiont among all the samples and M. bovis the least prevalent. Only in CA was the abundance of a pathobiont different according to disease status, where M. haemolytica was significantly more abundant in the BRD-affected animals than apparently healthy animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insight into the nasal microbiome community composition in both animals diagnosed with BRD and healthy animals, and shows that the farm effect plays a more significant role in determining the microbiome community than disease status in young dairy calves.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"7 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal pathobiont abundance does not differ between dairy cattle with or without clinical symptoms of bovine respiratory disease.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Eunice Centeno-Delphia, Erica A Long, Audrey C Ellis, Sarah Hofmann, Kara Mosier, Noelmi Ulloa, Johnnie Junior Cheng, Andrew Richards, Jacquelyn P Boerman, Jennifer Koziol, Mohit S Verma, Timothy A Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42523-025-00382-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) remains a significant health and economic problem to the dairy cattle industry. Multiple risk factors contribute to BRD susceptibility including the bacterial pathobionts Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis. Studies have characterized and quantified the abundance of these bacteria in the nasal cavity of cattle to infer and help disease diagnosis; nonetheless, there is still discrepancy in the results observed of when these microbes are commensal or pathogenic. Additionally, some of these studies are limited to a specific farm. The goal of this study is to compare the nasal microbiome community (diversity and composition) and the abundance of the four bacterial pathogens (by qPCR) in the nasal cavity to identify differences between dairy calves that are apparently healthy and those identified to have BRD. Nasal swabs were collected from approximately 50 apparently healthy and 50 BRD-affected calves sampled from five different dairy farms in the US (CA, IN, NY (two farms), and TX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calves diagnosed with BRD in NY, and TX had lower nasal microbiome diversity compared to the apparently healthy calves. Differences in the nasal microbiome composition were observed between the different farms predicted by Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac dissimilarities. Commensal and pathobiont genera Acinetobacter, Moraxella, Psychrobacter, Histophilus, Mannheimia, Mycoplasma, and Pasteurella were prevalent in the bovine nasal microbiome regardless of farm or disease status. The BRD-pathobiont H. somni was the most prevalent pathobiont among all the samples and M. bovis the least prevalent. Only in CA was the abundance of a pathobiont different according to disease status, where M. haemolytica was significantly more abundant in the BRD-affected animals than apparently healthy animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insight into the nasal microbiome community composition in both animals diagnosed with BRD and healthy animals, and shows that the farm effect plays a more significant role in determining the microbiome community than disease status in young dairy calves.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal microbiome\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal microbiome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00382-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00382-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)仍然是奶牛行业的一个重要的健康和经济问题。多种危险因素导致BRD易感性,包括细菌病原体溶血性贫血症、多杀性巴氏杆菌、嗜病组织菌和牛支原体。研究对牛鼻腔中这些细菌的丰度进行了表征和量化,以推断和帮助疾病诊断;尽管如此,这些微生物是共生的还是致病的,观察到的结果仍然存在差异。此外,其中一些研究仅限于特定的农场。本研究的目的是比较鼻腔微生物群落(多样性和组成)和四种细菌病原体的丰度(通过qPCR),以确定明显健康的奶牛和被确定患有BRD的奶牛之间的差异。从美国五个不同的奶牛场(加州、印第安纳州、纽约州(两个农场)和德克萨斯州)采集了大约50头明显健康的小牛和50头受brd影响的小牛的鼻拭子。结果:与表面健康的犊牛相比,纽约州和得克萨斯州诊断为BRD的犊牛鼻腔微生物群多样性较低。通过Bray-Curtis预测和加权UniFrac差异,观察到不同农场之间鼻腔微生物组成的差异。不动杆菌属、莫拉氏菌属、冻干杆菌属、组织菌属、曼海姆氏菌属、支原体属和巴氏杆菌属在牛鼻微生物群中普遍存在,与农场或疾病状况无关。在所有样本中,brd病原体somni是最常见的,牛分枝杆菌是最不常见的。只有在CA中,病原体的丰度因疾病状况而异,其中溶血分枝杆菌在受brd影响的动物中的丰度明显高于表面上健康的动物。结论:本研究为诊断为BRD的动物和健康动物的鼻腔微生物群落组成提供了深入的了解,并表明在决定年轻奶牛微生物群落的作用方面,农场效应比疾病状态更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nasal pathobiont abundance does not differ between dairy cattle with or without clinical symptoms of bovine respiratory disease.

Background: Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) remains a significant health and economic problem to the dairy cattle industry. Multiple risk factors contribute to BRD susceptibility including the bacterial pathobionts Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis. Studies have characterized and quantified the abundance of these bacteria in the nasal cavity of cattle to infer and help disease diagnosis; nonetheless, there is still discrepancy in the results observed of when these microbes are commensal or pathogenic. Additionally, some of these studies are limited to a specific farm. The goal of this study is to compare the nasal microbiome community (diversity and composition) and the abundance of the four bacterial pathogens (by qPCR) in the nasal cavity to identify differences between dairy calves that are apparently healthy and those identified to have BRD. Nasal swabs were collected from approximately 50 apparently healthy and 50 BRD-affected calves sampled from five different dairy farms in the US (CA, IN, NY (two farms), and TX).

Results: Calves diagnosed with BRD in NY, and TX had lower nasal microbiome diversity compared to the apparently healthy calves. Differences in the nasal microbiome composition were observed between the different farms predicted by Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac dissimilarities. Commensal and pathobiont genera Acinetobacter, Moraxella, Psychrobacter, Histophilus, Mannheimia, Mycoplasma, and Pasteurella were prevalent in the bovine nasal microbiome regardless of farm or disease status. The BRD-pathobiont H. somni was the most prevalent pathobiont among all the samples and M. bovis the least prevalent. Only in CA was the abundance of a pathobiont different according to disease status, where M. haemolytica was significantly more abundant in the BRD-affected animals than apparently healthy animals.

Conclusions: This study offers insight into the nasal microbiome community composition in both animals diagnosed with BRD and healthy animals, and shows that the farm effect plays a more significant role in determining the microbiome community than disease status in young dairy calves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信