传统心脏康复与舞蹈治疗之间心率变异性的非线性动力学比较:一项非随机交叉临床试验。

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
João Pedro Lucas Neves Silva, Júlio César de Ávila Soares, Maria Júlia Lopez Laurino, Felipe Ribeiro, Natacha de Lima Gervazoni, Bruna Izadora Spinardi Alves, Eduarda Carvalho Novaes Moreira, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei, Roselene Modolo Regueiro Lorençoni
{"title":"传统心脏康复与舞蹈治疗之间心率变异性的非线性动力学比较:一项非随机交叉临床试验。","authors":"João Pedro Lucas Neves Silva, Júlio César de Ávila Soares, Maria Júlia Lopez Laurino, Felipe Ribeiro, Natacha de Lima Gervazoni, Bruna Izadora Spinardi Alves, Eduarda Carvalho Novaes Moreira, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei, Roselene Modolo Regueiro Lorençoni","doi":"10.1177/1089313X251316672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Dance has been suggested as an alternative therapeutic modality in cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP). Therefore, evaluating the physiological responses of the body during dance is necessary to provide information that will allows it to be practiced a safe and effective way. In this context, the objective of the current study was to evaluate and compare the cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM) of women with cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) during and after a dance-based cardiac rehabilitation session and a conventional cardiac rehabilitation session. <b>Methods:</b> In total, 19 women, with at least 1 CRF, participated in this non-randomized crossover clinical trial, consisting of 4 steps: I. Familiarization with the dance protocol (DP); II. DP session; III. Familiarization with the conventional protocol (CP); IV. CP session. The CAM was evaluated using heart rate variability, considering nonlinear methods: recurrence plot, debugged trend fluctuations, and symbolic analysis. For data evaluation, 2-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was used, <i>P</i> < .05. <b>Results:</b> During exercise, an effect of protocol was observed for most of indices. In the DP, higher values were recorded for DET, Alpha-1, and 0 V% indices, and lower values for 1 V% and 2 ULV% indices and for entropy measurements. During recovery, no differences were observed between protocols. Effects of the exercises were observed in the comparisons between moments for all indices, however, a similar pattern of recovery was found between DP and CP. <b>Conclusions:</b> Comparisons of the dance and conventional protocols revealed that CAM was similar in both approaches, while greater alterations in nonlinear dynamics were observed during the DP exercise. However, these alterations were not able to modify the recovery of the volunteers. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> The study was previously registered on the clinicaltrials.gov platform under registration number: NCT04967235. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04967235?locStr=Brazil&country=Brazil&cond=Cardiovascular%20risk%20factors&term=Heart%20Rate%20Variability&intr=Dance%20therapy&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":" ","pages":"1089313X251316672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Nonlinear Dynamics of Heart Rate Variability Between Conventional Cardiac Rehabilitation and Dance-Based Therapy: A Non-Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"João Pedro Lucas Neves Silva, Júlio César de Ávila Soares, Maria Júlia Lopez Laurino, Felipe Ribeiro, Natacha de Lima Gervazoni, Bruna Izadora Spinardi Alves, Eduarda Carvalho Novaes Moreira, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei, Roselene Modolo Regueiro Lorençoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1089313X251316672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Dance has been suggested as an alternative therapeutic modality in cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP). Therefore, evaluating the physiological responses of the body during dance is necessary to provide information that will allows it to be practiced a safe and effective way. In this context, the objective of the current study was to evaluate and compare the cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM) of women with cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) during and after a dance-based cardiac rehabilitation session and a conventional cardiac rehabilitation session. <b>Methods:</b> In total, 19 women, with at least 1 CRF, participated in this non-randomized crossover clinical trial, consisting of 4 steps: I. Familiarization with the dance protocol (DP); II. DP session; III. Familiarization with the conventional protocol (CP); IV. CP session. The CAM was evaluated using heart rate variability, considering nonlinear methods: recurrence plot, debugged trend fluctuations, and symbolic analysis. For data evaluation, 2-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was used, <i>P</i> < .05. <b>Results:</b> During exercise, an effect of protocol was observed for most of indices. In the DP, higher values were recorded for DET, Alpha-1, and 0 V% indices, and lower values for 1 V% and 2 ULV% indices and for entropy measurements. During recovery, no differences were observed between protocols. Effects of the exercises were observed in the comparisons between moments for all indices, however, a similar pattern of recovery was found between DP and CP. <b>Conclusions:</b> Comparisons of the dance and conventional protocols revealed that CAM was similar in both approaches, while greater alterations in nonlinear dynamics were observed during the DP exercise. However, these alterations were not able to modify the recovery of the volunteers. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> The study was previously registered on the clinicaltrials.gov platform under registration number: NCT04967235. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04967235?locStr=Brazil&country=Brazil&cond=Cardiovascular%20risk%20factors&term=Heart%20Rate%20Variability&intr=Dance%20therapy&rank=1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1089313X251316672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X251316672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X251316672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

舞蹈已被建议作为心脏康复计划(CRP)的一种替代治疗方式。因此,在舞蹈过程中评估身体的生理反应是必要的,以提供信息,使其能够安全有效地进行练习。在这种背景下,本研究的目的是评估和比较具有心血管危险因素(CRF)的女性在舞蹈心脏康复期间和之后的心脏自主调节(CAM)。方法:共有19名至少有1例CRF的女性参加了这项非随机交叉临床试验,包括4个步骤:1 .熟悉舞蹈方案(DP);2。DP会话;3。熟悉常规方案(CP);四、CP会话。CAM采用心率变异性进行评估,考虑非线性方法:递归图、调试趋势波动和符号分析。对于数据评价,采用重复测量的2-way方差分析,P结果:在运动期间,大多数指标都观察到方案的影响。在DP中,DET、Alpha-1和0 V%指数记录的值较高,1 V%和2 ULV%指数和熵测量的值较低。在恢复期间,两种治疗方案之间没有观察到差异。在所有指标的瞬间比较中观察到锻炼的效果,然而,在DP和CP之间发现了相似的恢复模式。结论:舞蹈和传统方案的比较表明,CAM在两种方法中都是相似的,而在DP锻炼期间观察到更大的非线性动力学变化。然而,这些改变并不能改变志愿者的恢复情况。临床试验注册:该研究先前已在clinicaltrials.gov平台注册,注册号为NCT04967235。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04967235?locStr=Brazil&country=Brazil&cond=Cardiovascular%20risk%20factors&term=Heart%20Rate%20Variability&intr=Dance%20therapy&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Nonlinear Dynamics of Heart Rate Variability Between Conventional Cardiac Rehabilitation and Dance-Based Therapy: A Non-Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.

Introduction: Dance has been suggested as an alternative therapeutic modality in cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP). Therefore, evaluating the physiological responses of the body during dance is necessary to provide information that will allows it to be practiced a safe and effective way. In this context, the objective of the current study was to evaluate and compare the cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM) of women with cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) during and after a dance-based cardiac rehabilitation session and a conventional cardiac rehabilitation session. Methods: In total, 19 women, with at least 1 CRF, participated in this non-randomized crossover clinical trial, consisting of 4 steps: I. Familiarization with the dance protocol (DP); II. DP session; III. Familiarization with the conventional protocol (CP); IV. CP session. The CAM was evaluated using heart rate variability, considering nonlinear methods: recurrence plot, debugged trend fluctuations, and symbolic analysis. For data evaluation, 2-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was used, P < .05. Results: During exercise, an effect of protocol was observed for most of indices. In the DP, higher values were recorded for DET, Alpha-1, and 0 V% indices, and lower values for 1 V% and 2 ULV% indices and for entropy measurements. During recovery, no differences were observed between protocols. Effects of the exercises were observed in the comparisons between moments for all indices, however, a similar pattern of recovery was found between DP and CP. Conclusions: Comparisons of the dance and conventional protocols revealed that CAM was similar in both approaches, while greater alterations in nonlinear dynamics were observed during the DP exercise. However, these alterations were not able to modify the recovery of the volunteers. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was previously registered on the clinicaltrials.gov platform under registration number: NCT04967235. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04967235?locStr=Brazil&country=Brazil&cond=Cardiovascular%20risk%20factors&term=Heart%20Rate%20Variability&intr=Dance%20therapy&rank=1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信