{"title":"炎症反应标记物对子宫内膜瘤患者卵巢癌检测的潜在功效","authors":"Yuki Iida, Shinya Sato, Koji Yamamoto, Masayo Okawa, Kohei Hikino, Mayumi Sawada, Hiroaki Komatsu, Fuminori Taniguchi","doi":"10.33160/yam.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of preoperative inflammatory response markers in distinguishing clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) from ovarian endometrioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage I ovarian cancer with histology CCC/EC or endometrioma who underwent surgery at our institution between 2010 and 2021 were included. Preoperative inflammatory response markers evaluated were white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, D-dimer, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The tumor markers CA125 and CA19-9 were analyzed. The median values of these markers were compared between the CCC/EC and the endometrioma groups. The areas under the curve (AUC) in Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients with stage I CCC/EC and 247 patients with endometrioma were included in the study. Inflammatory response markers were significantly higher in CCC/EC cases than in endometrioma cases (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Tumor markers demonstrated higher specificity than inflammatory response markers. The AUCs of CRP, ESR, D-dimer, NLR, and SII were significantly higher than those of CA125 and CA19-9 (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The values of NLR, PLR, and SII in four cases of ovarian cancer with preoperative suspected endometrioma were higher than the cut-off value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inflammatory response markers may be useful for the detection of stage I ovarian cancer. Notably, the NLR or SII, calculated using a complete blood count, appears particularly efficient. Combining tumor and inflammatory response markers may enhance diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing ovarian cancer from endometrioma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23795,"journal":{"name":"Yonago acta medica","volume":"68 1","pages":"51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential Efficacy of Inflammatory Response Markers for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer in Patients with Endometrioma.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Iida, Shinya Sato, Koji Yamamoto, Masayo Okawa, Kohei Hikino, Mayumi Sawada, Hiroaki Komatsu, Fuminori Taniguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.33160/yam.2025.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of preoperative inflammatory response markers in distinguishing clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) from ovarian endometrioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage I ovarian cancer with histology CCC/EC or endometrioma who underwent surgery at our institution between 2010 and 2021 were included. Preoperative inflammatory response markers evaluated were white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, D-dimer, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The tumor markers CA125 and CA19-9 were analyzed. The median values of these markers were compared between the CCC/EC and the endometrioma groups. The areas under the curve (AUC) in Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients with stage I CCC/EC and 247 patients with endometrioma were included in the study. Inflammatory response markers were significantly higher in CCC/EC cases than in endometrioma cases (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Tumor markers demonstrated higher specificity than inflammatory response markers. The AUCs of CRP, ESR, D-dimer, NLR, and SII were significantly higher than those of CA125 and CA19-9 (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The values of NLR, PLR, and SII in four cases of ovarian cancer with preoperative suspected endometrioma were higher than the cut-off value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inflammatory response markers may be useful for the detection of stage I ovarian cancer. Notably, the NLR or SII, calculated using a complete blood count, appears particularly efficient. Combining tumor and inflammatory response markers may enhance diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing ovarian cancer from endometrioma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yonago acta medica\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"51-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yonago acta medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2025.02.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonago acta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2025.02.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Potential Efficacy of Inflammatory Response Markers for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer in Patients with Endometrioma.
Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of preoperative inflammatory response markers in distinguishing clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) from ovarian endometrioma.
Methods: Patients with stage I ovarian cancer with histology CCC/EC or endometrioma who underwent surgery at our institution between 2010 and 2021 were included. Preoperative inflammatory response markers evaluated were white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, D-dimer, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The tumor markers CA125 and CA19-9 were analyzed. The median values of these markers were compared between the CCC/EC and the endometrioma groups. The areas under the curve (AUC) in Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis were compared.
Results: Fifty patients with stage I CCC/EC and 247 patients with endometrioma were included in the study. Inflammatory response markers were significantly higher in CCC/EC cases than in endometrioma cases (P < 0.01). Tumor markers demonstrated higher specificity than inflammatory response markers. The AUCs of CRP, ESR, D-dimer, NLR, and SII were significantly higher than those of CA125 and CA19-9 (P < 0.01). The values of NLR, PLR, and SII in four cases of ovarian cancer with preoperative suspected endometrioma were higher than the cut-off value.
Conclusion: Inflammatory response markers may be useful for the detection of stage I ovarian cancer. Notably, the NLR or SII, calculated using a complete blood count, appears particularly efficient. Combining tumor and inflammatory response markers may enhance diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing ovarian cancer from endometrioma.
期刊介绍:
Yonago Acta Medica (YAM) is an electronic journal specializing in medical sciences, published by Tottori University Medical Press, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
The subject areas cover the following: molecular/cell biology; biochemistry; basic medicine; clinical medicine; veterinary medicine; clinical nutrition and food sciences; medical engineering; nursing sciences; laboratory medicine; clinical psychology; medical education.
Basically, contributors are limited to members of Tottori University and Tottori University Hospital. Researchers outside the above-mentioned university community may also submit papers on the recommendation of a professor, an associate professor, or a junior associate professor at this university community.
Articles are classified into four categories: review articles, original articles, patient reports, and short communications.