从问题到答案:一年级医学生循证医学问题提法与文献检索技巧教学。

Q3 Medicine
Juliana Magro, Caitlin Plovnick, Gregory Laynor, Joey Nicholson
{"title":"从问题到答案:一年级医学生循证医学问题提法与文献检索技巧教学。","authors":"Juliana Magro, Caitlin Plovnick, Gregory Laynor, Joey Nicholson","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical students may arrive at medical school with some research background but not necessarily evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills. First-year preclinical medical students require foundational skills for EBM (formulating background and foreground questions, navigating information sources, and conducting database searches) before critically appraising evidence and applying it to clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a flipped classroom EBM workshop for preclinical students combining prework modules and a 60-minute in-person session. After completing the online modules on foundational EBM skills, students participated in an in-person activity based on patient cases. In small groups, students formulated background and foreground questions based on a case and looked for evidence in resources assigned to each group. Small groups reported back to the whole group how they searched for information for their patient cases. A total of 105 first-year medical students were required to complete this workshop after concluding their basic sciences courses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Because current EBM assessment tools do not assess the early steps of EBM, we developed an assessment tool for foundational EBM tools. Before the modules, students completed a pretest on formulating questions and searching for information. After the workshop, students completed a posttest. Students showed improvement in differentiating background and foreground questions (<i>p</i> < .001), formulating answerable clinical questions (<i>p</i> < .001), and developing appropriate database searches (<i>p</i> < .001 and <i>p</i> = .002).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This flipped classroom approach to teaching foundational EBM skills may be adapted for different contexts, but educators should consider time limitations, group size, and tools for interactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Questions to Answers: Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine Question Formulation and Literature Searching Skills to First-Year Medical Students.\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Magro, Caitlin Plovnick, Gregory Laynor, Joey Nicholson\",\"doi\":\"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical students may arrive at medical school with some research background but not necessarily evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills. First-year preclinical medical students require foundational skills for EBM (formulating background and foreground questions, navigating information sources, and conducting database searches) before critically appraising evidence and applying it to clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a flipped classroom EBM workshop for preclinical students combining prework modules and a 60-minute in-person session. After completing the online modules on foundational EBM skills, students participated in an in-person activity based on patient cases. In small groups, students formulated background and foreground questions based on a case and looked for evidence in resources assigned to each group. Small groups reported back to the whole group how they searched for information for their patient cases. A total of 105 first-year medical students were required to complete this workshop after concluding their basic sciences courses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Because current EBM assessment tools do not assess the early steps of EBM, we developed an assessment tool for foundational EBM tools. Before the modules, students completed a pretest on formulating questions and searching for information. After the workshop, students completed a posttest. Students showed improvement in differentiating background and foreground questions (<i>p</i> < .001), formulating answerable clinical questions (<i>p</i> < .001), and developing appropriate database searches (<i>p</i> < .001 and <i>p</i> = .002).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This flipped classroom approach to teaching foundational EBM skills may be adapted for different contexts, but educators should consider time limitations, group size, and tools for interactivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"11496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832641/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:医学院的学生可能有一些研究背景,但不一定有循证医学(EBM)的技能。在批判性地评估证据并将其应用于临床场景之前,一年级的临床基础医学学生需要EBM的基本技能(制定背景和前景问题,导航信息源和进行数据库搜索)。方法:我们为临床前学生开发了一个翻转课堂EBM研讨会,结合了课前模块和60分钟的面对面会议。在完成基础EBM技能的在线模块后,学生们参加了一个基于患者案例的现场活动。在小组中,学生根据一个案例提出背景和前景问题,并在分配给每个小组的资源中寻找证据。小组向整个小组报告他们是如何为他们的病例搜索信息的。总共有105名一年级医科学生在完成基础科学课程后完成了这个讲习班。结果:由于目前的EBM评估工具不能评估EBM的早期步骤,我们开发了一个用于基础EBM工具的评估工具。在学习模块之前,学生们完成了一个关于提出问题和搜索信息的预测试。工作坊结束后,学生们完成了一个后测。学生在区分背景问题和前景问题(p < 0.001)、制定可回答的临床问题(p < 0.001)和开发适当的数据库搜索(p < 0.001和p = 0.002)方面均有改善。讨论:这种教授基础循证医学技能的翻转课堂方法可能适用于不同的环境,但教育者应该考虑时间限制、小组规模和互动工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Questions to Answers: Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine Question Formulation and Literature Searching Skills to First-Year Medical Students.

Introduction: Medical students may arrive at medical school with some research background but not necessarily evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills. First-year preclinical medical students require foundational skills for EBM (formulating background and foreground questions, navigating information sources, and conducting database searches) before critically appraising evidence and applying it to clinical scenarios.

Methods: We developed a flipped classroom EBM workshop for preclinical students combining prework modules and a 60-minute in-person session. After completing the online modules on foundational EBM skills, students participated in an in-person activity based on patient cases. In small groups, students formulated background and foreground questions based on a case and looked for evidence in resources assigned to each group. Small groups reported back to the whole group how they searched for information for their patient cases. A total of 105 first-year medical students were required to complete this workshop after concluding their basic sciences courses.

Results: Because current EBM assessment tools do not assess the early steps of EBM, we developed an assessment tool for foundational EBM tools. Before the modules, students completed a pretest on formulating questions and searching for information. After the workshop, students completed a posttest. Students showed improvement in differentiating background and foreground questions (p < .001), formulating answerable clinical questions (p < .001), and developing appropriate database searches (p < .001 and p = .002).

Discussion: This flipped classroom approach to teaching foundational EBM skills may be adapted for different contexts, but educators should consider time limitations, group size, and tools for interactivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信