使用dupilumab和omalizumab治疗慢性鼻窦炎的现实世界:来自韩国国民健康保险服务数据库的结果

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.209
S A Han, J Yoon, B H Kim, J H Park, Y-S Lim, Y B Kim, C G Cho, S-W Park, J Y Kim
{"title":"使用dupilumab和omalizumab治疗慢性鼻窦炎的现实世界:来自韩国国民健康保险服务数据库的结果","authors":"S A Han, J Yoon, B H Kim, J H Park, Y-S Lim, Y B Kim, C G Cho, S-W Park, J Y Kim","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological treatment has proven effective for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and is increasingly prescribed. However, in the real-world, strict adherence to the recommended dose may not be feasible and studies on the actual administration patterns of biologics are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the patterns of real-world use of biologics for CRS in Korea, through the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from the NHIS database from January 2010 to March 2024. Patients with CRS or nasal polyp defined by the ICD-10 codes, who had undergone computed tomography, and had a history of being prescribed dupilumab or omalizumab were identified. A total of 808 patients were analysed for their administration patterns and systemic corticosteroid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve weeks after initiation of therapy, 46.2% of patients received dupilumab at 2-weekly intervals and 53.9% of patients on omalizumab patients were receiving treatment at 2- or 4-week intervals. The annual expense of CRS patients treated with biologics was greater than for those receiving other treatments. The average annual usage of systemic steroids was decreased from 33.0 days to 12.7 days after using biologics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study which analysed real-world data in a large population, suggest a discrepancy between the recommended dose and real-world administration of biologics. Further studies are warranted on feasible administration schedules that reflect various patient factors and healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"172-179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with dupilumab and omalizumab: results from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database.\",\"authors\":\"S A Han, J Yoon, B H Kim, J H Park, Y-S Lim, Y B Kim, C G Cho, S-W Park, J Y Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/Rhin24.209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological treatment has proven effective for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and is increasingly prescribed. However, in the real-world, strict adherence to the recommended dose may not be feasible and studies on the actual administration patterns of biologics are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the patterns of real-world use of biologics for CRS in Korea, through the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from the NHIS database from January 2010 to March 2024. Patients with CRS or nasal polyp defined by the ICD-10 codes, who had undergone computed tomography, and had a history of being prescribed dupilumab or omalizumab were identified. A total of 808 patients were analysed for their administration patterns and systemic corticosteroid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve weeks after initiation of therapy, 46.2% of patients received dupilumab at 2-weekly intervals and 53.9% of patients on omalizumab patients were receiving treatment at 2- or 4-week intervals. The annual expense of CRS patients treated with biologics was greater than for those receiving other treatments. The average annual usage of systemic steroids was decreased from 33.0 days to 12.7 days after using biologics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study which analysed real-world data in a large population, suggest a discrepancy between the recommended dose and real-world administration of biologics. Further studies are warranted on feasible administration schedules that reflect various patient factors and healthcare costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"172-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.209\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物治疗已被证明对慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的治疗有效,并且越来越多地被开处方。然而,在现实世界中,严格遵守推荐剂量可能是不可行的,对生物制剂实际给药模式的研究也是有限的。本研究旨在通过国民健康保险服务(NHIS)评估韩国CRS生物制剂的实际使用模式。方法:分析2010年1月至2024年3月NHIS数据库的数据。经ICD-10编码定义的CRS或鼻息肉患者,接受过计算机断层扫描,并有处方dupilumab或omalizumab的病史。共分析了808例患者的给药模式和全身皮质类固醇使用情况。结果:开始治疗12周后,46.2%的患者每2周接受一次杜匹单抗治疗,53.9%的奥玛单抗患者每2或4周接受一次治疗。接受生物制剂治疗的CRS患者的年费用高于接受其他治疗的患者。使用生物制剂后,全身性类固醇的年平均使用量从33.0天减少到12.7天。结论:本研究分析了大量人群的实际数据,结果表明生物制剂的推荐剂量与实际给药量之间存在差异。有必要进一步研究反映各种患者因素和医疗保健成本的可行给药时间表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with dupilumab and omalizumab: results from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database.

Background: Biological treatment has proven effective for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and is increasingly prescribed. However, in the real-world, strict adherence to the recommended dose may not be feasible and studies on the actual administration patterns of biologics are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the patterns of real-world use of biologics for CRS in Korea, through the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).

Methods: We analysed data from the NHIS database from January 2010 to March 2024. Patients with CRS or nasal polyp defined by the ICD-10 codes, who had undergone computed tomography, and had a history of being prescribed dupilumab or omalizumab were identified. A total of 808 patients were analysed for their administration patterns and systemic corticosteroid use.

Results: Twelve weeks after initiation of therapy, 46.2% of patients received dupilumab at 2-weekly intervals and 53.9% of patients on omalizumab patients were receiving treatment at 2- or 4-week intervals. The annual expense of CRS patients treated with biologics was greater than for those receiving other treatments. The average annual usage of systemic steroids was decreased from 33.0 days to 12.7 days after using biologics.

Conclusions: The results of this study which analysed real-world data in a large population, suggest a discrepancy between the recommended dose and real-world administration of biologics. Further studies are warranted on feasible administration schedules that reflect various patient factors and healthcare costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信