社交媒体的使用和电子烟内容的暴露:加州男女同性恋、双性恋、质疑和异性恋青年的比较。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ollie Ganz, Nishi Gonsalves, Eugene M Talbot, Scott I Donaldson, Michelle Jeong, Jon-Patrick Allem
{"title":"社交媒体的使用和电子烟内容的暴露:加州男女同性恋、双性恋、质疑和异性恋青年的比较。","authors":"Ollie Ganz, Nishi Gonsalves, Eugene M Talbot, Scott I Donaldson, Michelle Jeong, Jon-Patrick Allem","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the rapidly changing media landscape and popularity of e-cigarettes among young adults who identify as lesbian or gay, bisexual, questioning, or something else (LGB+), timely data on media consumption and exposure to e-cigarette content across media channels is imperative for developing counter-messaging and public education campaigns for these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2023 data from young adults in California, this study examined how social media use differed for heterosexual and LGB+ young adults, by sex. Exposure to e-cigarette content across media channels was also compared between heterosexual and LGB+ young adults, by sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from a non-probability representative sample of young adults in California showed that more LGB+ young adults reported using Tumblr and fewer reported using Facebook and Snapchat, compared with heterosexual young adults, among both males and females. Use of Reddit was more common among LGB+ versus heterosexual females, but there were no differences by sexual identity among males. Exposure to e-cigarette marketing was more common among LGB+ females compared with heterosexual females, but this was not the case for males. Exposure to user-generated e-cigarette content, and self-reported visits to e-cigarette websites, were more common among LGB+ females compared to heterosexual females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of treating LGB+ individuals as a heterogeneous group. As such, anti-tobacco campaigns targeting LGB+ individuals that leverage social media will want to consider which platforms are most used among their target audience to increase campaign reach.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study builds upon the literature by providing timely data on how LGB+ young adults consume social media and are exposed to e-cigarette marketing. Findings have implications for tobacco education campaigns designed for LGB+ individuals that leverage social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media Use and Exposure to E-Cigarette Content: A Comparison of Lesbian or Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning and Heterosexual Male and Female Young Adults in California.\",\"authors\":\"Ollie Ganz, Nishi Gonsalves, Eugene M Talbot, Scott I Donaldson, Michelle Jeong, Jon-Patrick Allem\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the rapidly changing media landscape and popularity of e-cigarettes among young adults who identify as lesbian or gay, bisexual, questioning, or something else (LGB+), timely data on media consumption and exposure to e-cigarette content across media channels is imperative for developing counter-messaging and public education campaigns for these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2023 data from young adults in California, this study examined how social media use differed for heterosexual and LGB+ young adults, by sex. Exposure to e-cigarette content across media channels was also compared between heterosexual and LGB+ young adults, by sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from a non-probability representative sample of young adults in California showed that more LGB+ young adults reported using Tumblr and fewer reported using Facebook and Snapchat, compared with heterosexual young adults, among both males and females. Use of Reddit was more common among LGB+ versus heterosexual females, but there were no differences by sexual identity among males. Exposure to e-cigarette marketing was more common among LGB+ females compared with heterosexual females, but this was not the case for males. Exposure to user-generated e-cigarette content, and self-reported visits to e-cigarette websites, were more common among LGB+ females compared to heterosexual females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of treating LGB+ individuals as a heterogeneous group. As such, anti-tobacco campaigns targeting LGB+ individuals that leverage social media will want to consider which platforms are most used among their target audience to increase campaign reach.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study builds upon the literature by providing timely data on how LGB+ young adults consume social media and are exposed to e-cigarette marketing. Findings have implications for tobacco education campaigns designed for LGB+ individuals that leverage social media.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:鉴于快速变化的媒体环境和电子烟在同性恋、双性恋、质疑性取向或其他(LGB+)的年轻人中的流行,及时获得媒体消费和跨媒体渠道接触电子烟内容的数据对于针对这些人开展反信息传递和公共教育活动是必不可少的。方法:利用2023年加州年轻人的数据,本研究按性别调查了异性恋和LGB+年轻人使用社交媒体的差异。通过媒体渠道接触电子烟内容的情况也被异性恋者和LGB+年轻人按性别进行了比较。结果:来自加利福尼亚年轻人的非概率代表性样本的发现表明,与异性恋年轻人相比,更多的LGB+年轻人报告使用Tumblr,更少的报告使用Facebook和Snapchat,无论是男性还是女性。与异性恋女性相比,LGB+女性使用Reddit的频率更高,但男性之间的性别身份没有差异。与异性恋女性相比,LGB+女性接触电子烟营销的情况更为普遍,但男性并非如此。与异性恋女性相比,LGB+女性更容易接触到用户生成的电子烟内容,并自我报告访问电子烟网站。结论:这些发现强调了将LGB+个体视为异质群体的重要性。因此,针对LGB+个人的反烟草运动利用社交媒体将需要考虑哪些平台在目标受众中使用最多,以增加活动范围。启示:本研究通过提供LGB+年轻人如何消费社交媒体和接触电子烟营销的及时数据,建立在文献的基础上。研究结果对利用社交媒体为LGB+个人设计的烟草教育活动具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Media Use and Exposure to E-Cigarette Content: A Comparison of Lesbian or Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning and Heterosexual Male and Female Young Adults in California.

Introduction: Given the rapidly changing media landscape and popularity of e-cigarettes among young adults who identify as lesbian or gay, bisexual, questioning, or something else (LGB+), timely data on media consumption and exposure to e-cigarette content across media channels is imperative for developing counter-messaging and public education campaigns for these individuals.

Methods: Using 2023 data from young adults in California, this study examined how social media use differed for heterosexual and LGB+ young adults, by sex. Exposure to e-cigarette content across media channels was also compared between heterosexual and LGB+ young adults, by sex.

Results: Findings from a non-probability representative sample of young adults in California showed that more LGB+ young adults reported using Tumblr and fewer reported using Facebook and Snapchat, compared with heterosexual young adults, among both males and females. Use of Reddit was more common among LGB+ versus heterosexual females, but there were no differences by sexual identity among males. Exposure to e-cigarette marketing was more common among LGB+ females compared with heterosexual females, but this was not the case for males. Exposure to user-generated e-cigarette content, and self-reported visits to e-cigarette websites, were more common among LGB+ females compared to heterosexual females.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of treating LGB+ individuals as a heterogeneous group. As such, anti-tobacco campaigns targeting LGB+ individuals that leverage social media will want to consider which platforms are most used among their target audience to increase campaign reach.

Implications: This study builds upon the literature by providing timely data on how LGB+ young adults consume social media and are exposed to e-cigarette marketing. Findings have implications for tobacco education campaigns designed for LGB+ individuals that leverage social media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信