评价体育活动偏好的离散选择实验:属性及其水平的混合方法研究。

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.125
Mohammad Veisi, Rajabali Daroudi, Ramin Kordi, Ali Akbari Sari
{"title":"评价体育活动偏好的离散选择实验:属性及其水平的混合方法研究。","authors":"Mohammad Veisi, Rajabali Daroudi, Ramin Kordi, Ali Akbari Sari","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrete choice experiment (DCE) has become a leading method for evaluating health sector preferences. Despite its common use in evaluating physical activity (PA) preference, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal attribute and level, and this step often lacks rigorous documentation. This study aimed to identify suitable attributes and levels for a PA program for future application in DCE studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a mixed-method approach. Initially, a rapid review was performed using databases and search engines. The findings were then used for a 2-stage semi-structured interview for attribute addition and scoring. Finally, top-scoring attributes were selected, and a small expert panel determined their associated levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our rapid review, from 8144 titles according to search strategy, 10 were selected for data extraction. After content analysis and integration of similar attributes, 12 were identified and 4 more were added from interviews. Using the opinions of the expert panel, the top 5 attributes were selected and a total of 22 levels were determined for these 5 attributes. The selected attributes included monthly cost, companions, distance, PA time, and PA type, with total scores of 150, 149, 147, 144, and 123, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified 5 attributes and 22 corresponding levels as effective tools for measuring PA preferences using a DCE approach. As this is a pioneering study, further comprehensive research is recommended for improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"38 ","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrete Choice Experiment in Evaluating Preferences for Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study of Attributes and Their Levels.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Veisi, Rajabali Daroudi, Ramin Kordi, Ali Akbari Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/mjiri.38.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrete choice experiment (DCE) has become a leading method for evaluating health sector preferences. Despite its common use in evaluating physical activity (PA) preference, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal attribute and level, and this step often lacks rigorous documentation. This study aimed to identify suitable attributes and levels for a PA program for future application in DCE studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a mixed-method approach. Initially, a rapid review was performed using databases and search engines. The findings were then used for a 2-stage semi-structured interview for attribute addition and scoring. Finally, top-scoring attributes were selected, and a small expert panel determined their associated levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our rapid review, from 8144 titles according to search strategy, 10 were selected for data extraction. After content analysis and integration of similar attributes, 12 were identified and 4 more were added from interviews. Using the opinions of the expert panel, the top 5 attributes were selected and a total of 22 levels were determined for these 5 attributes. The selected attributes included monthly cost, companions, distance, PA time, and PA type, with total scores of 150, 149, 147, 144, and 123, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified 5 attributes and 22 corresponding levels as effective tools for measuring PA preferences using a DCE approach. As this is a pioneering study, further comprehensive research is recommended for improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:离散选择实验(DCE)已成为评估卫生部门偏好的主要方法。尽管它通常用于评估体育活动(PA)偏好,但在最佳属性和水平上缺乏共识,并且这一步骤通常缺乏严格的文档。本研究旨在为未来应用于DCE研究的PA程序确定合适的属性和水平。方法:本研究采用混合方法。最初,使用数据库和搜索引擎进行快速审查。然后将调查结果用于两阶段的半结构化访谈,以进行属性添加和评分。最后,选择得分最高的属性,并由一个小型专家小组确定其相关级别。结果:在我们的快速检索中,根据检索策略从8144篇文献中筛选出10篇文献进行数据提取。经过内容分析和相似属性的整合,确定了12个,并从访谈中增加了4个。根据专家小组的意见,选出最重要的5个属性,并为这5个属性确定了22个级别。选择的属性包括每月费用、同伴、距离、PA时间和PA类型,总分分别为150、149、147、144和123。结论:我们的研究确定了5个属性和22个相应的水平,作为使用DCE方法测量PA偏好的有效工具。由于这是一项开创性的研究,建议进一步全面研究以改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrete Choice Experiment in Evaluating Preferences for Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study of Attributes and Their Levels.

Background: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) has become a leading method for evaluating health sector preferences. Despite its common use in evaluating physical activity (PA) preference, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal attribute and level, and this step often lacks rigorous documentation. This study aimed to identify suitable attributes and levels for a PA program for future application in DCE studies.

Methods: This study used a mixed-method approach. Initially, a rapid review was performed using databases and search engines. The findings were then used for a 2-stage semi-structured interview for attribute addition and scoring. Finally, top-scoring attributes were selected, and a small expert panel determined their associated levels.

Results: In our rapid review, from 8144 titles according to search strategy, 10 were selected for data extraction. After content analysis and integration of similar attributes, 12 were identified and 4 more were added from interviews. Using the opinions of the expert panel, the top 5 attributes were selected and a total of 22 levels were determined for these 5 attributes. The selected attributes included monthly cost, companions, distance, PA time, and PA type, with total scores of 150, 149, 147, 144, and 123, respectively.

Conclusion: Our study identified 5 attributes and 22 corresponding levels as effective tools for measuring PA preferences using a DCE approach. As this is a pioneering study, further comprehensive research is recommended for improved outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信