TAVR 术后需要永久起搏器的患者中心室起搏负担重的患病率。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Joseph Ibrahim, Brent S Medoff, Jianhui Zhu, Floyd Thoma, Derek Serna-Gallegos, David West, Amber Makani, N A Mark Estes, Catalin Toma, Ibrahim Sultan, Dustin Kliner
{"title":"TAVR 术后需要永久起搏器的患者中心室起搏负担重的患病率。","authors":"Joseph Ibrahim, Brent S Medoff, Jianhui Zhu, Floyd Thoma, Derek Serna-Gallegos, David West, Amber Makani, N A Mark Estes, Catalin Toma, Ibrahim Sultan, Dustin Kliner","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01958-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is occasionally complicated by high degree atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement. Newer valve design, delivery platform evolution, and deployment technique refinement have lowered this risk. Ventricular pacing ≥ 30% has been previously identified as a predictor for worse clinical outcomes in this population. This study aims to assess the prevalence of high long-term pacing burden in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study to evaluate patients from 2019 to 2023 who required PPM for high degree AVB following TAVR. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, procedural details were obtained. Ventricular pacing (VP) percentages were collected from PPM interrogations at 1, 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>138 patients had PPM placement post-TAVR. Approximately one third of patients demonstrated ventricular pacing less than 25% at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months (Fig. 1). Roughly 50% of patients had > 75% ventricular pacing at 1 month, 6months and 12 months. There was no difference in baseline demographics or EKG characteristics at 1 month. In a univariable logistic regression analysis, there were no statistically significant predictors of VP ≥ 30%. Although, balloon expandable valves and lower STS scores demonstrated an association with lower risk of VP ≥ 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that a significant portion of patients with PPM for high degree AVB after TAVR have low pacing burden at 6-12 months. Further investigation is needed to assess valve-specific predictors and alternative pacing approaches of AVB management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1045-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of high ventricular pacing burden in patients requiring permanent pacemaker post TAVR.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Ibrahim, Brent S Medoff, Jianhui Zhu, Floyd Thoma, Derek Serna-Gallegos, David West, Amber Makani, N A Mark Estes, Catalin Toma, Ibrahim Sultan, Dustin Kliner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01958-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is occasionally complicated by high degree atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement. Newer valve design, delivery platform evolution, and deployment technique refinement have lowered this risk. Ventricular pacing ≥ 30% has been previously identified as a predictor for worse clinical outcomes in this population. This study aims to assess the prevalence of high long-term pacing burden in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study to evaluate patients from 2019 to 2023 who required PPM for high degree AVB following TAVR. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, procedural details were obtained. Ventricular pacing (VP) percentages were collected from PPM interrogations at 1, 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>138 patients had PPM placement post-TAVR. Approximately one third of patients demonstrated ventricular pacing less than 25% at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months (Fig. 1). Roughly 50% of patients had > 75% ventricular pacing at 1 month, 6months and 12 months. There was no difference in baseline demographics or EKG characteristics at 1 month. In a univariable logistic regression analysis, there were no statistically significant predictors of VP ≥ 30%. Although, balloon expandable valves and lower STS scores demonstrated an association with lower risk of VP ≥ 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that a significant portion of patients with PPM for high degree AVB after TAVR have low pacing burden at 6-12 months. Further investigation is needed to assess valve-specific predictors and alternative pacing approaches of AVB management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1045-1051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01958-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01958-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)偶尔会并发高度房室传导阻滞(AVB),需要放置永久性起搏器(PPM)。更新的阀门设计、交付平台的发展和部署技术的改进降低了这种风险。室性起搏≥30%先前已被确定为该人群较差临床结果的预测因子。本研究旨在评估该队列中高长期起搏负担的患病率。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,评估2019年至2023年因TAVR后高度AVB需要PPM的患者。获得基线人口统计学、临床特征、手术细节。在1、6和12个月时通过PPM询问收集心室起搏(VP)百分比。结果:138例患者在tavr术后放置PPM。大约三分之一的患者在1个月、6个月和12个月时心室起搏低于25%(图1)。大约50%的患者在1个月、6个月和12个月时心室起搏低于75%。1个月时基线人口统计学或心电图特征无差异。在单变量logistic回归分析中,没有统计学意义的预测因子VP≥30%。然而,球囊可膨胀瓣膜和较低的STS评分表明,VP风险降低≥30%。结论:我们的研究表明,相当一部分TAVR后高度AVB的PPM患者在6-12个月时的起搏负担较低。需要进一步的研究来评估瓣膜特异性预测因素和AVB管理的替代起搏方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of high ventricular pacing burden in patients requiring permanent pacemaker post TAVR.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is occasionally complicated by high degree atrioventricular block (AVB) requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement. Newer valve design, delivery platform evolution, and deployment technique refinement have lowered this risk. Ventricular pacing ≥ 30% has been previously identified as a predictor for worse clinical outcomes in this population. This study aims to assess the prevalence of high long-term pacing burden in this cohort.

Methods: This is a retrospective study to evaluate patients from 2019 to 2023 who required PPM for high degree AVB following TAVR. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, procedural details were obtained. Ventricular pacing (VP) percentages were collected from PPM interrogations at 1, 6 and 12 months.

Results: 138 patients had PPM placement post-TAVR. Approximately one third of patients demonstrated ventricular pacing less than 25% at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months (Fig. 1). Roughly 50% of patients had > 75% ventricular pacing at 1 month, 6months and 12 months. There was no difference in baseline demographics or EKG characteristics at 1 month. In a univariable logistic regression analysis, there were no statistically significant predictors of VP ≥ 30%. Although, balloon expandable valves and lower STS scores demonstrated an association with lower risk of VP ≥ 30%.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that a significant portion of patients with PPM for high degree AVB after TAVR have low pacing burden at 6-12 months. Further investigation is needed to assess valve-specific predictors and alternative pacing approaches of AVB management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信